Copybara | 854996b | 2021-09-07 19:36:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 1 | # Copyright 2017 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. |
| 2 | # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style |
| 3 | # license that can be found in the LICENSE file or at |
| 4 | # https://developers.google.com/open-source/licenses/bsd |
| 5 | |
| 6 | """Tests for the WorkEnv class.""" |
| 7 | from __future__ import print_function |
| 8 | from __future__ import division |
| 9 | from __future__ import absolute_import |
| 10 | |
| 11 | import copy |
| 12 | import logging |
| 13 | import sys |
| 14 | import unittest |
| 15 | import mock |
| 16 | |
| 17 | from google.appengine.api import memcache |
| 18 | from google.appengine.ext import testbed |
| 19 | |
| 20 | import settings |
| 21 | from businesslogic import work_env |
| 22 | from features import filterrules_helpers |
| 23 | from framework import authdata |
| 24 | from framework import exceptions |
| 25 | from framework import framework_constants |
| 26 | from framework import framework_helpers |
| 27 | from framework import framework_views |
| 28 | from framework import permissions |
| 29 | from framework import sorting |
| 30 | from features import send_notifications |
| 31 | from proto import features_pb2 |
| 32 | from proto import project_pb2 |
| 33 | from proto import tracker_pb2 |
| 34 | from proto import user_pb2 |
| 35 | from services import config_svc |
| 36 | from services import features_svc |
| 37 | from services import issue_svc |
| 38 | from services import project_svc |
| 39 | from services import user_svc |
| 40 | from services import usergroup_svc |
| 41 | from services import service_manager |
| 42 | from services import spam_svc |
| 43 | from services import star_svc |
| 44 | from services import template_svc |
| 45 | from testing import fake |
| 46 | from testing import testing_helpers |
| 47 | from tracker import tracker_bizobj |
| 48 | from tracker import tracker_constants |
| 49 | |
| 50 | |
| 51 | def _Issue(project_id, local_id): |
| 52 | # TODO(crbug.com/monorail/8124): Many parts of monorail's codebase |
| 53 | # assumes issue.owner_id could never be None and that issues without |
| 54 | # owners have owner_id = 0. |
| 55 | issue = tracker_pb2.Issue(owner_id=0) |
| 56 | issue.project_name = 'proj-%d' % project_id |
| 57 | issue.project_id = project_id |
| 58 | issue.local_id = local_id |
| 59 | issue.issue_id = project_id*100 + local_id |
| 60 | return issue |
| 61 | |
| 62 | |
| 63 | class WorkEnvTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| 64 | |
| 65 | def setUp(self): |
| 66 | self.cnxn = 'fake connection' |
| 67 | self.services = service_manager.Services( |
| 68 | config=fake.ConfigService(), |
| 69 | cache_manager=fake.CacheManager(), |
| 70 | issue=fake.IssueService(), |
| 71 | user=fake.UserService(), |
| 72 | project=fake.ProjectService(), |
| 73 | issue_star=fake.IssueStarService(), |
| 74 | project_star=fake.ProjectStarService(), |
| 75 | user_star=fake.UserStarService(), |
| 76 | hotlist_star=fake.HotlistStarService(), |
| 77 | features=fake.FeaturesService(), |
| 78 | usergroup=fake.UserGroupService(), |
| 79 | template=mock.Mock(spec=template_svc.TemplateService), |
| 80 | spam=fake.SpamService()) |
| 81 | self.project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 82 | 'proj', project_id=789, committer_ids=[111]) |
| 83 | self.component_id_1 = self.services.config.CreateComponentDef( |
| 84 | self.cnxn, self.project.project_id, 'Component', 'Docstring', False, [], |
| 85 | [], 0, 111, []) |
| 86 | self.component_id_2 = self.services.config.CreateComponentDef( |
| 87 | self.cnxn, self.project.project_id, 'Component>Test', 'Docstring', |
| 88 | False, [], [], 0, 111, []) |
| 89 | |
| 90 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(self.project.project_id, [], []) |
| 91 | config.well_known_statuses = [ |
| 92 | tracker_pb2.StatusDef(status='Fixed', means_open=False) |
| 93 | ] |
| 94 | self.services.config.StoreConfig(self.cnxn, config) |
| 95 | self.admin_user = self.services.user.TestAddUser( |
| 96 | 'admin@example.com', 444) |
| 97 | self.admin_user.is_site_admin = True |
| 98 | self.user_1 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('user_111@example.com', 111) |
| 99 | self.user_2 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('user_222@example.com', 222) |
| 100 | self.user_3 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('user_333@example.com', 333) |
| 101 | self.hotlist = self.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 102 | 'myhotlist', summary='old sum', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id], |
| 103 | editor_ids=[self.user_2.user_id], description='old desc', |
| 104 | is_private=True) |
| 105 | # reserved for testing that a hotlist does not exist |
| 106 | self.dne_hotlist_id = 1234 |
| 107 | self.mr = testing_helpers.MakeMonorailRequest(project=self.project) |
| 108 | self.mr.perms = permissions.READ_ONLY_PERMISSIONSET |
| 109 | self.field_def_1_name = 'test_field_1' |
| 110 | self.field_def_1 = fake.MakeTestFieldDef( |
| 111 | 101, self.project.project_id, tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.INT_TYPE, |
| 112 | field_name=self.field_def_1_name, max_value=10) |
| 113 | self.services.config.TestAddFieldDef(self.field_def_1) |
| 114 | self.PAST_TIME = 12345 |
| 115 | self.dne_project_id = 999 |
| 116 | sorting.InitializeArtValues(self.services) |
| 117 | |
| 118 | self.work_env = work_env.WorkEnv( |
| 119 | self.mr, self.services, 'Testing phase') |
| 120 | |
| 121 | def SignIn(self, user_id=111): |
| 122 | self.mr.auth = authdata.AuthData.FromUserID( |
| 123 | self.cnxn, user_id, self.services) |
| 124 | self.mr.perms = permissions.GetPermissions( |
| 125 | self.mr.auth.user_pb, self.mr.auth.effective_ids, self.project) |
| 126 | |
| 127 | def testAssertUserCanModifyIssues_Empty(self): |
| 128 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 129 | we._AssertUserCanModifyIssues([], True) |
| 130 | |
| 131 | def testAssertUserCanModifyIssues_RestrictedFields(self): |
| 132 | restricted_int_fd = fake.MakeTestFieldDef( |
| 133 | 1, 789, tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.INT_TYPE, |
| 134 | field_name='int_field', is_restricted_field=True) |
| 135 | self.services.config.TestAddFieldDef(restricted_int_fd) |
| 136 | |
| 137 | restricted_enum_fd = fake.MakeTestFieldDef( |
| 138 | 2, 789, tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.ENUM_TYPE, |
| 139 | field_name='enum_field', |
| 140 | is_restricted_field=True) |
| 141 | self.services.config.TestAddFieldDef(restricted_enum_fd) |
| 142 | |
| 143 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 144 | 789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 145 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 146 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 147 | summary='changing summary', |
| 148 | fields_clear=[restricted_int_fd.field_id], |
| 149 | labels_remove=['enum_field-test']) |
| 150 | issue_delta_pairs = [(issue, delta)] |
| 151 | |
| 152 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 153 | with self.assertRaisesRegexp(permissions.PermissionException, |
| 154 | r'.+int_field\n.+enum_field'): |
| 155 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 156 | we._AssertUserCanModifyIssues(issue_delta_pairs, True) |
| 157 | |
| 158 | # Add user_1 as an editor |
| 159 | restricted_int_fd.editor_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 160 | restricted_enum_fd.editor_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 161 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 162 | we._AssertUserCanModifyIssues(issue_delta_pairs, True) |
| 163 | |
| 164 | def testAssertUserCanModifyIssues_HasEditPerms(self): |
| 165 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 166 | 789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 167 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 168 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(summary='changing summary', cc_ids_add=[111]) |
| 169 | issue_delta_pairs = [(issue, delta)] |
| 170 | |
| 171 | # Committer can edit issues. |
| 172 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 173 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 174 | we._AssertUserCanModifyIssues( |
| 175 | issue_delta_pairs, True, comment_content='ping') |
| 176 | |
| 177 | def testAssertUserCanModifyIssues_MergedInto(self): |
| 178 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 179 | 789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 180 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 181 | |
| 182 | restricted_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 183 | 789, 2, 'summary', 'Aavailable', self.admin_user.user_id, |
| 184 | labels=['Restrict-View-Chicken']) |
| 185 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(restricted_issue) |
| 186 | |
| 187 | issue_delta_pairs = [ |
| 188 | (issue, tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(merged_into=restricted_issue.issue_id)) |
| 189 | ] |
| 190 | |
| 191 | # Committer cannot merge into issue they cannot edit. |
| 192 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 193 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 194 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 195 | we._AssertUserCanModifyIssues( |
| 196 | issue_delta_pairs, True, comment_content='ping') |
| 197 | |
| 198 | def testAssertUserCanModifyIssues_HasFineGrainedPerms(self): |
| 199 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 200 | 'projWithExtraPerms', |
| 201 | project_id=788, |
| 202 | contrib_ids=[self.user_1.user_id], |
| 203 | extra_perms=[ |
| 204 | project_pb2.Project.ExtraPerms( |
| 205 | member_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 206 | perms=[ |
| 207 | permissions.ADD_ISSUE_COMMENT, |
| 208 | permissions.EDIT_ISSUE_SUMMARY, permissions.EDIT_ISSUE_OWNER |
| 209 | ]) |
| 210 | ]) |
| 211 | error_messages_re = [] |
| 212 | |
| 213 | # user_1 can update issue summaries in the project. |
| 214 | issue_1 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 215 | 788, 1, 'summary', 'Available', self.admin_user.user_id, |
| 216 | project_name='farm') |
| 217 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_1) |
| 218 | issue_delta_pairs = [(issue_1, tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(summary='bok bok'))] |
| 219 | |
| 220 | # user_1 does not have EDIT_ISSUE_CC perms in project. |
| 221 | error_messages_re.append(r'.+changes to issue farm:2') |
| 222 | issue_2 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 223 | 788, 2, 'summary', 'Fixed', self.admin_user.user_id, |
| 224 | project_name='farm') |
| 225 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_2) |
| 226 | issue_delta_pairs.append( |
| 227 | (issue_2, tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(cc_ids_add=[777]))) |
| 228 | |
| 229 | # user_1 does not have EDIT_ISSUE_STATUS perms in project. |
| 230 | error_messages_re.append(r'.+changes to issue farm:3') |
| 231 | issue_3 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 232 | 788, 3, 'summary', 'Fixed', self.admin_user.user_id, |
| 233 | project_name='farm') |
| 234 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_3) |
| 235 | issue_delta_pairs.append( |
| 236 | (issue_3, tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(status='eggsHatching'))) |
| 237 | |
| 238 | # user_1 can update issue owners in the project. |
| 239 | issue_4 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 240 | 788, 4, 'summary', 'Fixed', self.admin_user.user_id, |
| 241 | project_name='farm') |
| 242 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_3) |
| 243 | issue_delta_pairs.append( |
| 244 | (issue_4, tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(owner_id=self.user_2.user_id))) |
| 245 | |
| 246 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 247 | with self.assertRaisesRegexp(permissions.PermissionException, |
| 248 | '\n'.join(error_messages_re)): |
| 249 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 250 | we._AssertUserCanModifyIssues( |
| 251 | issue_delta_pairs, False, comment_content='ping') |
| 252 | |
| 253 | def testAssertUserCanModifyIssues_IssueGrantedPerms(self): |
| 254 | """We properly take issue granted permissions into account.""" |
| 255 | granting_fd = tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 256 | field_name='grants_editissue', |
| 257 | field_id=1, |
| 258 | field_type=tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.USER_TYPE, |
| 259 | grants_perm='editissue') |
| 260 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(789, [], []) |
| 261 | config.field_defs = [granting_fd] |
| 262 | self.services.config.StoreConfig('cnxn', config) |
| 263 | |
| 264 | # we add user_2 to "grants_editissue" field which should grant them |
| 265 | # "EditIssue" in this issue. |
| 266 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 267 | 789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', self.admin_user.user_id, |
| 268 | field_values=[ |
| 269 | tracker_pb2.FieldValue(field_id=1, user_id=self.user_2.user_id) |
| 270 | ]) |
| 271 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 272 | issue_delta_pairs = [ |
| 273 | (issue, tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(summary='changing summary')) |
| 274 | ] |
| 275 | |
| 276 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_2.user_id) |
| 277 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 278 | we._AssertUserCanModifyIssues(issue_delta_pairs, False) |
| 279 | |
| 280 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_3.user_id) |
| 281 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 282 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 283 | we._AssertUserCanModifyIssues(issue_delta_pairs, False) |
| 284 | |
| 285 | |
| 286 | # FUTURE: GetSiteReadOnlyState() |
| 287 | # FUTURE: SetSiteReadOnlyState() |
| 288 | # FUTURE: GetSiteBannerMessage() |
| 289 | # FUTURE: SetSiteBannerMessage() |
| 290 | |
| 291 | def testCreateProject_Normal(self): |
| 292 | """We can create a project.""" |
| 293 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 294 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 295 | project_id = we.CreateProject( |
| 296 | 'newproj', [111], [222], [333], 'summary', 'desc') |
| 297 | actual = we.GetProject(project_id) |
| 298 | |
| 299 | self.assertEqual('summary', actual.summary) |
| 300 | self.assertEqual('desc', actual.description) |
| 301 | self.services.template.CreateDefaultProjectTemplates\ |
| 302 | .assert_called_once_with(self.mr.cnxn, project_id) |
| 303 | |
| 304 | def testCreateProject_AlreadyExists(self): |
| 305 | """We can create a project.""" |
| 306 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 307 | # Project 'proj' is created in setUp(). |
| 308 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.ProjectAlreadyExists): |
| 309 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 310 | we.CreateProject('proj', [111], [222], [333], 'summary', 'desc') |
| 311 | |
| 312 | self.assertFalse( |
| 313 | self.services.template.CreateDefaultProjectTemplates.called) |
| 314 | |
| 315 | def testCreateProject_NotAllowed(self): |
| 316 | """A user without permissions cannon create a project.""" |
| 317 | self.SignIn() |
| 318 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 319 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 320 | we.CreateProject('proj', [111], [222], [333], 'summary', 'desc') |
| 321 | |
| 322 | self.assertFalse( |
| 323 | self.services.template.CreateDefaultProjectTemplates.called) |
| 324 | |
| 325 | def testCheckProjectName_OK(self): |
| 326 | """We can check a project name.""" |
| 327 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 328 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 329 | self.assertIsNone(we.CheckProjectName('foo')) |
| 330 | |
| 331 | def testCheckProjectName_InvalidProjectName(self): |
| 332 | """We can check an invalid project name.""" |
| 333 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 334 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 335 | self.assertIsNotNone(we.CheckProjectName('Foo')) |
| 336 | |
| 337 | def testCheckProjectName_AlreadyExists(self): |
| 338 | """There is already a project with that name.""" |
| 339 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 340 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 341 | self.assertIsNotNone(we.CheckProjectName('proj')) |
| 342 | |
| 343 | def testCheckProjectName_NotAllowed(self): |
| 344 | """Users that can't create a project shouldn't get any information.""" |
| 345 | self.SignIn() |
| 346 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 347 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 348 | we.CheckProjectName('Foo') |
| 349 | |
| 350 | def testCheckComponentName_OK(self): |
| 351 | self.SignIn() |
| 352 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 353 | self.assertIsNone(we.CheckComponentName( |
| 354 | self.project.project_id, None, 'Component')) |
| 355 | |
| 356 | def testCheckComponentName_ParentComponentOK(self): |
| 357 | self.services.config.CreateComponentDef( |
| 358 | self.cnxn, self.project.project_id, 'Component', 'Docstring', |
| 359 | False, [], [], 0, 111, []) |
| 360 | self.SignIn() |
| 361 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 362 | self.assertIsNone(we.CheckComponentName( |
| 363 | self.project.project_id, 'Component', 'SubComponent')) |
| 364 | |
| 365 | def testCheckComponentName_InvalidComponentName(self): |
| 366 | self.SignIn() |
| 367 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 368 | self.assertIsNotNone(we.CheckComponentName( |
| 369 | self.project.project_id, None, 'Component>Foo')) |
| 370 | |
| 371 | def testCheckComponentName_ComponentAlreadyExists(self): |
| 372 | self.services.config.CreateComponentDef( |
| 373 | self.cnxn, self.project.project_id, 'Component', 'Docstring', |
| 374 | False, [], [], 0, 111, []) |
| 375 | self.SignIn() |
| 376 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 377 | self.assertIsNotNone(we.CheckComponentName( |
| 378 | self.project.project_id, None, 'Component')) |
| 379 | |
| 380 | def testCheckComponentName_NotAllowedToViewProject(self): |
| 381 | self.project.access = project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY |
| 382 | self.SignIn(333) |
| 383 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 384 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 385 | we.CheckComponentName(self.project.project_id, None, 'Component') |
| 386 | |
| 387 | def testCheckComponentName_ParentComponentDoesntExist(self): |
| 388 | self.SignIn() |
| 389 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchComponentException): |
| 390 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 391 | we.CheckComponentName( |
| 392 | self.project.project_id, 'Component', 'SubComponent') |
| 393 | |
| 394 | def testCheckFieldName_OK(self): |
| 395 | self.SignIn() |
| 396 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 397 | self.assertIsNone(we.CheckFieldName( |
| 398 | self.project.project_id, 'Field')) |
| 399 | |
| 400 | def testCheckFieldName_InvalidFieldName(self): |
| 401 | self.SignIn() |
| 402 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 403 | self.assertIsNotNone(we.CheckFieldName( |
| 404 | self.project.project_id, '**Field**')) |
| 405 | |
| 406 | def testCheckFieldName_FieldAlreadyExists(self): |
| 407 | fd = fake.MakeTestFieldDef( |
| 408 | 1, self.project.project_id, tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.STR_TYPE, |
| 409 | field_name='Field') |
| 410 | self.services.config.TestAddFieldDef(fd) |
| 411 | self.SignIn() |
| 412 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 413 | self.assertIsNotNone(we.CheckFieldName( |
| 414 | self.project.project_id, 'Field')) |
| 415 | |
| 416 | def testCheckFieldName_FieldIsPrefixOfAnother(self): |
| 417 | fd = fake.MakeTestFieldDef( |
| 418 | 1, self.project.project_id, tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.STR_TYPE, |
| 419 | field_name='Field-Foo') |
| 420 | self.services.config.TestAddFieldDef(fd) |
| 421 | self.SignIn() |
| 422 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 423 | self.assertIsNotNone(we.CheckFieldName( |
| 424 | self.project.project_id, 'Field')) |
| 425 | |
| 426 | def testCheckFieldName_AnotherFieldIsPrefix(self): |
| 427 | fd = fake.MakeTestFieldDef( |
| 428 | 1, self.project.project_id, tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.STR_TYPE, |
| 429 | field_name='Field') |
| 430 | self.services.config.TestAddFieldDef(fd) |
| 431 | self.SignIn() |
| 432 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 433 | self.assertIsNotNone(we.CheckFieldName( |
| 434 | self.project.project_id, 'Field-Foo')) |
| 435 | |
| 436 | def testCheckFieldName_ReservedPrefix(self): |
| 437 | self.SignIn() |
| 438 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 439 | self.assertIsNotNone(we.CheckFieldName( |
| 440 | self.project.project_id, 'Summary')) |
| 441 | |
| 442 | def testCheckFieldName_ReservedSuffix(self): |
| 443 | self.SignIn() |
| 444 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 445 | self.assertIsNotNone(we.CheckFieldName( |
| 446 | self.project.project_id, 'Chicken-ApproveR')) |
| 447 | |
| 448 | def testCheckFieldName_NotAllowedToViewProject(self): |
| 449 | self.project.access = project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY |
| 450 | self.SignIn(user_id=333) |
| 451 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 452 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 453 | we.CheckFieldName(self.project.project_id, 'Field') |
| 454 | |
| 455 | def testListProjects(self): |
| 456 | """We can get the project IDs of projects visible to the current user.""" |
| 457 | # Project 789 is created in setUp() |
| 458 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 459 | 'proj2', project_id=2, access=project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY) |
| 460 | self.services.project.TestAddProject('proj3', project_id=3) |
| 461 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 462 | actual = we.ListProjects() |
| 463 | |
| 464 | self.assertEqual([3, 789], actual) |
| 465 | |
| 466 | @mock.patch('settings.branded_domains', |
| 467 | {'proj3': 'branded.com', '*': 'bugs.chromium.org'}) |
| 468 | def testListProjects_BrandedDomain_NotLive(self): |
| 469 | """Branded domains don't affect localhost and demo servers.""" |
| 470 | # Project 789 is created in setUp() |
| 471 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 472 | 'proj2', project_id=2, access=project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY) |
| 473 | self.services.project.TestAddProject('proj3', project_id=3) |
| 474 | |
| 475 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 476 | actual = we.ListProjects(domain='localhost:8080') |
| 477 | self.assertEqual([3, 789], actual) |
| 478 | |
| 479 | actual = we.ListProjects(domain='app-id.appspot.com') |
| 480 | self.assertEqual([3, 789], actual) |
| 481 | |
| 482 | @mock.patch('settings.branded_domains', |
| 483 | {'proj3': 'branded.com', '*': 'bugs.chromium.org'}) |
| 484 | def testListProjects_BrandedDomain_LiveSite(self): |
| 485 | """Project list only contains projects on the current branded domain.""" |
| 486 | # Project 789 is created in setUp() |
| 487 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 488 | 'proj2', project_id=2, access=project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY) |
| 489 | self.services.project.TestAddProject('proj3', project_id=3) |
| 490 | |
| 491 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 492 | actual = we.ListProjects(domain='branded.com') |
| 493 | self.assertEqual([3], actual) |
| 494 | |
| 495 | actual = we.ListProjects(domain='bugs.chromium.org') |
| 496 | self.assertEqual([789], actual) |
| 497 | |
| 498 | def testGetProject_Normal(self): |
| 499 | """We can get an existing project by project_id.""" |
| 500 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 501 | actual = we.GetProject(789) |
| 502 | |
| 503 | self.assertEqual(self.project, actual) |
| 504 | |
| 505 | def testGetProject_NoSuchProject(self): |
| 506 | """We reject attempts to get a non-existent project.""" |
| 507 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 508 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 509 | _actual = we.GetProject(999) |
| 510 | |
| 511 | def testGetProject_NotAllowed(self): |
| 512 | """We reject attempts to get a project we don't have permission to.""" |
| 513 | self.project.access = project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY |
| 514 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 515 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 516 | _actual = we.GetProject(789) |
| 517 | |
| 518 | def testGetProjectByName_Normal(self): |
| 519 | """We can get an existing project by project_name.""" |
| 520 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 521 | actual = we.GetProjectByName('proj') |
| 522 | |
| 523 | self.assertEqual(self.project, actual) |
| 524 | |
| 525 | def testGetProjectByName_NoSuchProject(self): |
| 526 | """We reject attempts to get a non-existent project.""" |
| 527 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 528 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 529 | _actual = we.GetProjectByName('huh-what') |
| 530 | |
| 531 | def testGetProjectByName_NoPermission(self): |
| 532 | """We reject attempts to get a project we don't have permissions to.""" |
| 533 | self.project.access = project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY |
| 534 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 535 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 536 | _actual = we.GetProjectByName('proj') |
| 537 | |
| 538 | def AddUserProjects(self): |
| 539 | project_states = { |
| 540 | 'live': project_pb2.ProjectState.LIVE, |
| 541 | 'archived': project_pb2.ProjectState.ARCHIVED, |
| 542 | 'deletable': project_pb2.ProjectState.DELETABLE} |
| 543 | |
| 544 | projects = {} |
| 545 | for name, state in project_states.items(): |
| 546 | projects['owner-'+name] = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 547 | 'owner-' + name, state=state, owner_ids=[222]) |
| 548 | projects['committer-'+name] = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 549 | 'committer-' + name, state=state, committer_ids=[222]) |
| 550 | projects['contributor-'+name] = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 551 | 'contributor-' + name, state=state) |
| 552 | projects['contributor-'+name].contributor_ids = [222] |
| 553 | |
| 554 | projects['members-only'] = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 555 | 'members-only', owner_ids=[222]) |
| 556 | projects['members-only'].access = ( |
| 557 | project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY) |
| 558 | |
| 559 | return projects |
| 560 | |
| 561 | def testGatherProjectMembershipsForUser_OtherUser(self): |
| 562 | """We can get the projects in which a user has a role. |
| 563 | Member only projects are hidden.""" |
| 564 | projects = self.AddUserProjects() |
| 565 | |
| 566 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 567 | owner, committer, contrib = we.GatherProjectMembershipsForUser(222) |
| 568 | |
| 569 | self.assertEqual([projects['owner-live'].project_id], owner) |
| 570 | self.assertEqual([projects['committer-live'].project_id], committer) |
| 571 | self.assertEqual([projects['contributor-live'].project_id], contrib) |
| 572 | |
| 573 | def testGatherProjectMembershipsForUser_OwnUser(self): |
| 574 | """We can get the projects in which the logged in user has a role. """ |
| 575 | projects = self.AddUserProjects() |
| 576 | |
| 577 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 578 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 579 | owner, committer, contrib = we.GatherProjectMembershipsForUser(222) |
| 580 | |
| 581 | self.assertEqual( |
| 582 | [ |
| 583 | projects['members-only'].project_id, |
| 584 | projects['owner-live'].project_id |
| 585 | ], owner) |
| 586 | self.assertEqual([projects['committer-live'].project_id], committer) |
| 587 | self.assertEqual([projects['contributor-live'].project_id], contrib) |
| 588 | |
| 589 | def testGatherProjectMembershipsForUser_Admin(self): |
| 590 | """Admins can see all project roles another user has. """ |
| 591 | projects = self.AddUserProjects() |
| 592 | |
| 593 | self.SignIn(user_id=444) |
| 594 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 595 | owner, committer, contrib = we.GatherProjectMembershipsForUser(222) |
| 596 | |
| 597 | self.assertEqual( |
| 598 | [ |
| 599 | projects['members-only'].project_id, |
| 600 | projects['owner-live'].project_id |
| 601 | ], owner) |
| 602 | self.assertEqual([projects['committer-live'].project_id], committer) |
| 603 | self.assertEqual([projects['contributor-live'].project_id], contrib) |
| 604 | |
| 605 | def testGetUserRolesInAllProjects_OtherUsers(self): |
| 606 | """We can get the projects in which the user has a role.""" |
| 607 | projects = self.AddUserProjects() |
| 608 | |
| 609 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 610 | owner, member, contrib = we.GetUserRolesInAllProjects({222}) |
| 611 | |
| 612 | by_name = lambda project: project.project_name |
| 613 | self.assertEqual( |
| 614 | [projects['owner-live']], |
| 615 | sorted(list(owner.values()), key=by_name)) |
| 616 | self.assertEqual( |
| 617 | [projects['committer-live']], |
| 618 | sorted(list(member.values()), key=by_name)) |
| 619 | self.assertEqual( |
| 620 | [projects['contributor-live']], |
| 621 | sorted(list(contrib.values()), key=by_name)) |
| 622 | |
| 623 | def testGetUserRolesInAllProjects_OwnUser(self): |
| 624 | """We can get the projects in which the user has a role.""" |
| 625 | projects = self.AddUserProjects() |
| 626 | |
| 627 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 628 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 629 | owner, member, contrib = we.GetUserRolesInAllProjects({222}) |
| 630 | |
| 631 | by_name = lambda project: project.project_name |
| 632 | self.assertEqual( |
| 633 | [projects['members-only'], projects['owner-archived'], |
| 634 | projects['owner-live']], |
| 635 | sorted(list(owner.values()), key=by_name)) |
| 636 | self.assertEqual( |
| 637 | [projects['committer-archived'], projects['committer-live']], |
| 638 | sorted(list(member.values()), key=by_name)) |
| 639 | self.assertEqual( |
| 640 | [projects['contributor-archived'], projects['contributor-live']], |
| 641 | sorted(list(contrib.values()), key=by_name)) |
| 642 | |
| 643 | def testGetUserRolesInAllProjects_Admin(self): |
| 644 | """We can get the projects in which the user has a role.""" |
| 645 | projects = self.AddUserProjects() |
| 646 | |
| 647 | self.SignIn(user_id=444) |
| 648 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 649 | owner, member, contrib = we.GetUserRolesInAllProjects({222}) |
| 650 | |
| 651 | by_name = lambda project: project.project_name |
| 652 | self.assertEqual( |
| 653 | [projects['members-only'], projects['owner-archived'], |
| 654 | projects['owner-deletable'], projects['owner-live']], |
| 655 | sorted(list(owner.values()), key=by_name)) |
| 656 | self.assertEqual( |
| 657 | [projects['committer-archived'], projects['committer-deletable'], |
| 658 | projects['committer-live']], |
| 659 | sorted(list(member.values()), key=by_name)) |
| 660 | self.assertEqual( |
| 661 | [projects['contributor-archived'], projects['contributor-deletable'], |
| 662 | projects['contributor-live']], |
| 663 | sorted(list(contrib.values()), key=by_name)) |
| 664 | |
| 665 | def testGetUserProjects_OnlyLiveOfOtherUsers(self): |
| 666 | """Regular users should only see live projects of other users.""" |
| 667 | projects = self.AddUserProjects() |
| 668 | |
| 669 | self.SignIn() |
| 670 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 671 | owner, archived, member, contrib = we.GetUserProjects({222}) |
| 672 | |
| 673 | self.assertEqual([projects['owner-live']], owner) |
| 674 | self.assertEqual([], archived) |
| 675 | self.assertEqual([projects['committer-live']], member) |
| 676 | self.assertEqual([projects['contributor-live']], contrib) |
| 677 | |
| 678 | def testGetUserProjects_AdminSeesAll(self): |
| 679 | """Admins should see all projects from other users.""" |
| 680 | projects = self.AddUserProjects() |
| 681 | |
| 682 | self.SignIn(user_id=444) |
| 683 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 684 | owner, archived, member, contrib = we.GetUserProjects({222}) |
| 685 | |
| 686 | self.assertEqual([projects['members-only'], projects['owner-live']], owner) |
| 687 | self.assertEqual([projects['owner-archived']], archived) |
| 688 | self.assertEqual([projects['committer-live']], member) |
| 689 | self.assertEqual([projects['contributor-live']], contrib) |
| 690 | |
| 691 | def testGetUserProjects_UserSeesOwnProjects(self): |
| 692 | """Users should see all own projects.""" |
| 693 | projects = self.AddUserProjects() |
| 694 | |
| 695 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 696 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 697 | owner, archived, member, contrib = we.GetUserProjects({222}) |
| 698 | |
| 699 | self.assertEqual([projects['members-only'], projects['owner-live']], owner) |
| 700 | self.assertEqual([projects['owner-archived']], archived) |
| 701 | self.assertEqual([projects['committer-live']], member) |
| 702 | self.assertEqual([projects['contributor-live']], contrib) |
| 703 | |
| 704 | def testUpdateProject_Normal(self): |
| 705 | """We can update an existing project.""" |
| 706 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 707 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 708 | we.UpdateProject(789, read_only_reason='test reason') |
| 709 | project = we.GetProject(789) |
| 710 | |
| 711 | self.assertEqual('test reason', project.read_only_reason) |
| 712 | |
| 713 | def testUpdateProject_NoSuchProject(self): |
| 714 | """Updating a nonexistent project raises an exception.""" |
| 715 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 716 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 717 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 718 | we.UpdateProject(999, summary='new summary') |
| 719 | |
| 720 | def testDeleteProject_Normal(self): |
| 721 | """We can mark an existing project as deletable.""" |
| 722 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 723 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 724 | we.DeleteProject(789) |
| 725 | |
| 726 | self.assertEqual(project_pb2.ProjectState.DELETABLE, self.project.state) |
| 727 | |
| 728 | def testDeleteProject_NoSuchProject(self): |
| 729 | """Changing a nonexistent project raises an exception.""" |
| 730 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 731 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 732 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 733 | we.DeleteProject(999) |
| 734 | |
| 735 | def testStarProject_Normal(self): |
| 736 | """We can star and unstar a project.""" |
| 737 | self.SignIn() |
| 738 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 739 | self.assertFalse(we.IsProjectStarred(789)) |
| 740 | we.StarProject(789, True) |
| 741 | self.assertTrue(we.IsProjectStarred(789)) |
| 742 | we.StarProject(789, False) |
| 743 | self.assertFalse(we.IsProjectStarred(789)) |
| 744 | |
| 745 | def testStarProject_NoSuchProject(self): |
| 746 | """We can't star a nonexistent project.""" |
| 747 | self.SignIn() |
| 748 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 749 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 750 | we.StarProject(999, True) |
| 751 | |
| 752 | def testStarProject_Anon(self): |
| 753 | """Anon user can't star a project.""" |
| 754 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 755 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 756 | we.StarProject(789, True) |
| 757 | |
| 758 | def testIsProjectStarred_Normal(self): |
| 759 | """We can check if a project is starred.""" |
| 760 | # Tested by method testStarProject_Normal(). |
| 761 | pass |
| 762 | |
| 763 | def testIsProjectStarred_NoProjectSpecified(self): |
| 764 | """A project ID must be specified.""" |
| 765 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 766 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 767 | self.assertFalse(we.IsProjectStarred(None)) |
| 768 | |
| 769 | def testIsProjectStarred_NoSuchProject(self): |
| 770 | """We can't check for stars on a nonexistent project.""" |
| 771 | self.SignIn() |
| 772 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 773 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 774 | we.IsProjectStarred(999) |
| 775 | |
| 776 | def testGetProjectStarCount_Normal(self): |
| 777 | """We can count the stars of a project.""" |
| 778 | self.SignIn() |
| 779 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 780 | self.assertEqual(0, we.GetProjectStarCount(789)) |
| 781 | we.StarProject(789, True) |
| 782 | self.assertEqual(1, we.GetProjectStarCount(789)) |
| 783 | |
| 784 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 785 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 786 | we.StarProject(789, True) |
| 787 | self.assertEqual(2, we.GetProjectStarCount(789)) |
| 788 | we.StarProject(789, False) |
| 789 | self.assertEqual(1, we.GetProjectStarCount(789)) |
| 790 | |
| 791 | def testGetProjectStarCount_NoSuchProject(self): |
| 792 | """We can't count stars of a nonexistent project.""" |
| 793 | self.SignIn() |
| 794 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 795 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 796 | we.GetProjectStarCount(999) |
| 797 | |
| 798 | def testGetProjectStarCount_NoProjectSpecified(self): |
| 799 | """A project ID must be specified.""" |
| 800 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 801 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 802 | self.assertFalse(we.GetProjectStarCount(None)) |
| 803 | |
| 804 | def testListStarredProjects_ViewingSelf(self): |
| 805 | """A user can view their own starred projects, if they still have access.""" |
| 806 | project1 = self.services.project.TestAddProject('proj1', project_id=1) |
| 807 | project2 = self.services.project.TestAddProject('proj2', project_id=2) |
| 808 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 809 | self.SignIn() |
| 810 | we.StarProject(project1.project_id, True) |
| 811 | we.StarProject(project2.project_id, True) |
| 812 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 813 | [project1, project2], we.ListStarredProjects()) |
| 814 | project2.access = project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY |
| 815 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 816 | [project1], we.ListStarredProjects()) |
| 817 | |
| 818 | def testListStarredProjects_ViewingOther(self): |
| 819 | """A user can view their own starred projects, if they still have access.""" |
| 820 | project1 = self.services.project.TestAddProject('proj1', project_id=1) |
| 821 | project2 = self.services.project.TestAddProject('proj2', project_id=2) |
| 822 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 823 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 824 | we.StarProject(project1.project_id, True) |
| 825 | we.StarProject(project2.project_id, True) |
| 826 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 827 | self.assertEqual([], we.ListStarredProjects()) |
| 828 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 829 | [project1, project2], we.ListStarredProjects(viewed_user_id=222)) |
| 830 | project2.access = project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY |
| 831 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 832 | [project1], we.ListStarredProjects(viewed_user_id=222)) |
| 833 | |
| 834 | def testGetProjectConfig_Normal(self): |
| 835 | """We can get an existing config by project_id.""" |
| 836 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(789, ['LabelOne'], ['New']) |
| 837 | self.services.config.StoreConfig('cnxn', config) |
| 838 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 839 | actual = we.GetProjectConfig(789) |
| 840 | |
| 841 | self.assertEqual(config, actual) |
| 842 | |
| 843 | def testGetProjectConfig_NoSuchProject(self): |
| 844 | """We reject attempts to get a non-existent config.""" |
| 845 | self.services.config.strict = True |
| 846 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 847 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 848 | _actual = we.GetProjectConfig(self.dne_project_id) |
| 849 | |
| 850 | def testListProjectTemplates_IsMember(self): |
| 851 | private_tmpl = tracker_pb2.TemplateDef(name='Chicken', members_only=True) |
| 852 | public_tmpl = tracker_pb2.TemplateDef(name='Kale', members_only=False) |
| 853 | self.services.template.GetProjectTemplates.return_value = [ |
| 854 | private_tmpl, public_tmpl] |
| 855 | |
| 856 | self.SignIn() # user 111 is a member of self.project |
| 857 | |
| 858 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 859 | actual = we.ListProjectTemplates(self.project.project_id) |
| 860 | |
| 861 | self.assertEqual(actual, [private_tmpl, public_tmpl]) |
| 862 | self.services.template.GetProjectTemplates.assert_called_once_with( |
| 863 | self.mr.cnxn, self.project.project_id) |
| 864 | |
| 865 | def testListProjectTemplates_IsNotMember(self): |
| 866 | private_tmpl = tracker_pb2.TemplateDef(name='Chicken', members_only=True) |
| 867 | public_tmpl = tracker_pb2.TemplateDef(name='Kale', members_only=False) |
| 868 | self.services.template.GetProjectTemplates.return_value = [ |
| 869 | private_tmpl, public_tmpl] |
| 870 | |
| 871 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 872 | actual = we.ListProjectTemplates(self.project.project_id) |
| 873 | |
| 874 | self.assertEqual(actual, [public_tmpl]) |
| 875 | self.services.template.GetProjectTemplates.assert_called_once_with( |
| 876 | self.mr.cnxn, self.project.project_id) |
| 877 | |
| 878 | def testListComponentDefs(self): |
| 879 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 880 | 'Greece', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 881 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(project.project_id, [], []) |
| 882 | cd_1 = fake.MakeTestComponentDef(project.project_id, 1, path='Circe') |
| 883 | cd_2 = fake.MakeTestComponentDef(project.project_id, 2, path='Achilles') |
| 884 | cd_3 = fake.MakeTestComponentDef(project.project_id, 3, path='Patroclus') |
| 885 | config.component_defs = [cd_1, cd_2, cd_3] |
| 886 | self.services.config.StoreConfig(self.cnxn, config) |
| 887 | |
| 888 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 889 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 890 | actual = we.ListComponentDefs(project.project_id, 10, 1) |
| 891 | self.assertEqual(actual, work_env.ListResult([cd_2, cd_3], None)) |
| 892 | |
| 893 | def testListComponentDefs_NotFound(self): |
| 894 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 895 | |
| 896 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 897 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 898 | we.ListComponentDefs(404, 10, 1) |
| 899 | |
| 900 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 901 | 'Greece', |
| 902 | owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id], |
| 903 | access=project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY) |
| 904 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(project.project_id, [], []) |
| 905 | cd_1 = fake.MakeTestComponentDef(project.project_id, 1, path='Circe') |
| 906 | config.component_defs = [cd_1] |
| 907 | self.services.config.StoreConfig(self.cnxn, config) |
| 908 | |
| 909 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 910 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 911 | we.ListComponentDefs(project.project_id, 10, 1) |
| 912 | |
| 913 | def testListComponentDefs_InvalidPaginate(self): |
| 914 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 915 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 916 | we.ListComponentDefs(404, -1, 10) |
| 917 | |
| 918 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 919 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 920 | we.ListComponentDefs(404, 1, -10) |
| 921 | |
| 922 | @mock.patch('time.time') |
| 923 | def testCreateComponentDef(self, fake_time): |
| 924 | now = 123 |
| 925 | fake_time.return_value = now |
| 926 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 927 | 'Music', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 928 | admin = self.services.user.TestAddUser('admin@test.com', 555) |
| 929 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 930 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 931 | actual = we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 932 | project.project_id, 'hanggai', 'hamtlag', [admin.user_id], |
| 933 | [self.user_2.user_id], ['taro', 'mowgli']) |
| 934 | self.assertEqual(actual.project_id, project.project_id) |
| 935 | self.assertEqual(actual.path, 'hanggai') |
| 936 | self.assertEqual(actual.docstring, 'hamtlag') |
| 937 | self.assertEqual(actual.admin_ids, [admin.user_id]) |
| 938 | self.assertEqual(actual.cc_ids, [222]) |
| 939 | self.assertFalse(actual.deprecated) |
| 940 | self.assertEqual(actual.created, now) |
| 941 | self.assertEqual(actual.creator_id, self.user_1.user_id) |
| 942 | self.assertEqual( |
| 943 | actual.label_ids, |
| 944 | self.services.config.LookupLabelIDs( |
| 945 | self.cnxn, project.project_id, ['taro', 'mowgli'])) |
| 946 | |
| 947 | # Test with ancestor. |
| 948 | self.SignIn(admin.user_id) |
| 949 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 950 | actual = we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 951 | project.project_id, 'hanggai>band', 'rock band', |
| 952 | [self.user_2.user_id], [], []) |
| 953 | self.assertEqual(actual.project_id, project.project_id) |
| 954 | self.assertEqual(actual.path, 'hanggai>band') |
| 955 | self.assertEqual(actual.docstring, 'rock band') |
| 956 | self.assertEqual(actual.admin_ids, [self.user_2.user_id]) |
| 957 | self.assertFalse(actual.deprecated) |
| 958 | self.assertEqual(actual.created, now) |
| 959 | self.assertEqual(actual.creator_id, admin.user_id) |
| 960 | |
| 961 | def testCreateComponentDef_InvalidUsers(self): |
| 962 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 963 | 'Music', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 964 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 965 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 966 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 967 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 968 | project.project_id, 'hanggai', 'hamtlag', [404], [404], []) |
| 969 | |
| 970 | def testCreateComponentDef_InvalidLeaf(self): |
| 971 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 972 | 'Music', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 973 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 974 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 975 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 976 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 977 | project.project_id, 'music>hanggai.rockband', 'hamtlag', [], [], []) |
| 978 | |
| 979 | def testCreateComponentDef_LeafAlreadyExists(self): |
| 980 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 981 | 'Music', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 982 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 983 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 984 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 985 | project.project_id, 'mowgli', 'favorite things', |
| 986 | [self.user_1.user_id], [], []) |
| 987 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.ComponentDefAlreadyExists): |
| 988 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 989 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 990 | project.project_id, 'mowgli', 'more favorite things', [], [], []) |
| 991 | |
| 992 | # Test components with ancestors are also checked correctly |
| 993 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 994 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 995 | project.project_id, 'mowgli>food', 'lots of chicken', [], [], []) |
| 996 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.ComponentDefAlreadyExists): |
| 997 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 998 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 999 | project.project_id, 'mowgli>food', 'lots of salmon', [], [], []) |
| 1000 | |
| 1001 | def testCreateComponentDef_AncestorNotFound(self): |
| 1002 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1003 | 'Music', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 1004 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 1005 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1006 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1007 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 1008 | project.project_id, 'mowgli>chicken', 'more favorite things', [], |
| 1009 | [], []) |
| 1010 | |
| 1011 | def testCreateComponentDef_PermissionDenied(self): |
| 1012 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1013 | 'Music', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 1014 | admin = self.services.user.TestAddUser('admin@test.com', 888) |
| 1015 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 1016 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1017 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 1018 | project.project_id, 'mowgli', 'favorite things', [admin.user_id], [], |
| 1019 | []) |
| 1020 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 1021 | project.project_id, 'mowgli>beef', 'favorite things', [], [], []) |
| 1022 | |
| 1023 | user = self.services.user.TestAddUser('user@test.com', 777) |
| 1024 | self.SignIn(user.user_id) |
| 1025 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1026 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1027 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 1028 | project.project_id, 'bambi', 'spring time', [], [], []) |
| 1029 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1030 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1031 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 1032 | project.project_id, 'mowgli>chicken', 'more favorite things', [], |
| 1033 | [], []) |
| 1034 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1035 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1036 | we.CreateComponentDef( |
| 1037 | project.project_id, 'mowgli>beef>rice', 'more favorite things', [], |
| 1038 | [], []) |
| 1039 | |
| 1040 | def testDeleteComponentDef(self): |
| 1041 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1042 | 'Achilles', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 1043 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(project.project_id, [], []) |
| 1044 | component_def = fake.MakeTestComponentDef( |
| 1045 | project.project_id, 1, path='Chickens>Dickens') |
| 1046 | config.component_defs = [component_def] |
| 1047 | self.services.config.StoreConfig(self.cnxn, config) |
| 1048 | |
| 1049 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 1050 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1051 | we.DeleteComponentDef(project.project_id, component_def.component_id) |
| 1052 | |
| 1053 | self.assertEqual(config.component_defs, []) |
| 1054 | |
| 1055 | def testDeleteComponentDef_NotFound(self): |
| 1056 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1057 | 'Achilles', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 1058 | |
| 1059 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 1060 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchComponentException): |
| 1061 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1062 | we.DeleteComponentDef(project.project_id, 404) |
| 1063 | |
| 1064 | def testDeleteComponentDef_CannotViewProject(self): |
| 1065 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1066 | 'Achilles', |
| 1067 | owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id], |
| 1068 | access=project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY) |
| 1069 | |
| 1070 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 1071 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1072 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1073 | we.DeleteComponentDef(project.project_id, 404) |
| 1074 | |
| 1075 | def testDeleteComponentDef_SubcomponentFound(self): |
| 1076 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1077 | 'Achilles', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 1078 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(project.project_id, [], []) |
| 1079 | dickens_comp = fake.MakeTestComponentDef( |
| 1080 | project.project_id, 1, path='Chickens>Dickens') |
| 1081 | chickens_comp = fake.MakeTestComponentDef( |
| 1082 | project.project_id, 2, path='Chickens') |
| 1083 | config.component_defs = [chickens_comp, dickens_comp] |
| 1084 | self.services.config.StoreConfig(self.cnxn, config) |
| 1085 | |
| 1086 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 1087 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1088 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1089 | we.DeleteComponentDef(project.project_id, chickens_comp.component_id) |
| 1090 | |
| 1091 | def testDeleteComponentDef_NonComponentAdminsCannotDelete(self): |
| 1092 | admin = self.services.user.TestAddUser('circe@test.com', 888) |
| 1093 | user = self.services.user.TestAddUser('patroclus@test.com', 999) |
| 1094 | |
| 1095 | project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1096 | 'Achilles', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 1097 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(project.project_id, [], []) |
| 1098 | |
| 1099 | dickens_comp = fake.MakeTestComponentDef( |
| 1100 | project.project_id, |
| 1101 | 1, |
| 1102 | path='Chickens>Dickens', |
| 1103 | ) |
| 1104 | dickens_comp.admin_ids = [admin.user_id] |
| 1105 | chickens_comp = fake.MakeTestComponentDef( |
| 1106 | project.project_id, 2, path='Chickens') |
| 1107 | |
| 1108 | config.component_defs = [chickens_comp, dickens_comp] |
| 1109 | self.services.config.StoreConfig(self.cnxn, config) |
| 1110 | |
| 1111 | self.SignIn(admin.user_id) |
| 1112 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1113 | we.DeleteComponentDef(project.project_id, dickens_comp.component_id) |
| 1114 | |
| 1115 | self.SignIn(user.user_id) |
| 1116 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1117 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1118 | we.DeleteComponentDef(project.project_id, chickens_comp.component_id) |
| 1119 | |
| 1120 | |
| 1121 | # FUTURE: labels, statuses, components, rules, templates, and views. |
| 1122 | # FUTURE: project saved queries. |
| 1123 | # FUTURE: GetProjectPermissionsForUser() |
| 1124 | |
| 1125 | ### Field methods |
| 1126 | |
| 1127 | # FUTURE: All other field methods. |
| 1128 | |
| 1129 | def testGetFieldDef_Normal(self): |
| 1130 | """We can get an existing fielddef by field_id.""" |
| 1131 | fd = fake.MakeTestFieldDef( |
| 1132 | 2, self.project.project_id, tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.STR_TYPE, |
| 1133 | field_name='Field') |
| 1134 | self.services.config.TestAddFieldDef(fd) |
| 1135 | config = self.services.config.GetProjectConfig(self.cnxn, 789) |
| 1136 | |
| 1137 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1138 | actual = we.GetFieldDef(fd.field_id, self.project) |
| 1139 | |
| 1140 | self.assertEqual(config.field_defs[1], actual) |
| 1141 | |
| 1142 | def testGetFieldDef_NoSuchFieldDef(self): |
| 1143 | """We reject attempts to get a non-existent field.""" |
| 1144 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchFieldDefException): |
| 1145 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1146 | _actual = we.GetFieldDef(999, self.project) |
| 1147 | |
| 1148 | @mock.patch( |
| 1149 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1150 | @mock.patch( |
| 1151 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1152 | def testCreateIssue_Normal(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 1153 | """We can create an issue.""" |
| 1154 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1155 | approval_values = [tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue(approval_id=23, phase_id=3)] |
| 1156 | phases = [tracker_pb2.Phase(name='Canary', phase_id=3)] |
| 1157 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1158 | actual_issue, comment = we.CreateIssue( |
| 1159 | 789, |
| 1160 | 'sum', |
| 1161 | 'New', |
| 1162 | 111, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], |
| 1163 | 'desc', |
| 1164 | phases=phases, |
| 1165 | approval_values=approval_values) |
| 1166 | self.assertEqual(789, actual_issue.project_id) |
| 1167 | self.assertEqual('sum', actual_issue.summary) |
| 1168 | self.assertEqual('New', actual_issue.status) |
| 1169 | self.assertEqual(111, actual_issue.reporter_id) |
| 1170 | self.assertEqual(111, actual_issue.owner_id) |
| 1171 | self.assertEqual([333], actual_issue.cc_ids) |
| 1172 | self.assertEqual([], actual_issue.field_values) |
| 1173 | self.assertEqual([], actual_issue.component_ids) |
| 1174 | self.assertEqual(approval_values, actual_issue.approval_values) |
| 1175 | self.assertEqual(phases, actual_issue.phases) |
| 1176 | self.assertEqual('desc', comment.content) |
| 1177 | loaded_comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue( |
| 1178 | self.cnxn, actual_issue.issue_id) |
| 1179 | self.assertEqual('desc', loaded_comments[0].content) |
| 1180 | |
| 1181 | # Verify that an indexing task was enqueued for this issue: |
| 1182 | self.assertTrue(self.services.issue.enqueue_issues_called) |
| 1183 | self.assertEqual(1, len(self.services.issue.enqueued_issues)) |
| 1184 | self.assertEqual(actual_issue.issue_id, |
| 1185 | self.services.issue.enqueued_issues[0]) |
| 1186 | |
| 1187 | # Verify that tasks were queued to send email notifications. |
| 1188 | hostport = 'testing-app.appspot.com' |
| 1189 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_once_with( |
| 1190 | actual_issue.issue_id, hostport, 111, comment_id=comment.id) |
| 1191 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_once_with( |
| 1192 | actual_issue.issue_id, hostport, [], 111) |
| 1193 | |
| 1194 | @mock.patch( |
| 1195 | 'settings.preferred_domains', {'testing-app.appspot.com': 'example.com'}) |
| 1196 | @mock.patch( |
| 1197 | 'settings.branded_domains', {'proj': 'branded.com'}) |
| 1198 | @mock.patch( |
| 1199 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1200 | @mock.patch( |
| 1201 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1202 | def testCreateIssue_Branded(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 1203 | """Use branded domains in notification about creating an issue.""" |
| 1204 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1205 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1206 | actual_issue, comment = we.CreateIssue( |
| 1207 | 789, 'sum', 'New', 111, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], 'desc') |
| 1208 | |
| 1209 | self.assertEqual('proj', actual_issue.project_name) |
| 1210 | # Verify that tasks were queued to send email notifications. |
| 1211 | hostport = 'branded.com' |
| 1212 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_once_with( |
| 1213 | actual_issue.issue_id, hostport, 111, comment_id=comment.id) |
| 1214 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_once_with( |
| 1215 | actual_issue.issue_id, hostport, [], 111) |
| 1216 | |
| 1217 | @mock.patch( |
| 1218 | 'settings.preferred_domains', {'testing-app.appspot.com': 'example.com'}) |
| 1219 | @mock.patch( |
| 1220 | 'settings.branded_domains', {'other-proj': 'branded.com'}) |
| 1221 | @mock.patch( |
| 1222 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1223 | @mock.patch( |
| 1224 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1225 | def testCreateIssue_Nonbranded(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 1226 | """Don't use branded domains when creating issue in different project.""" |
| 1227 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1228 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1229 | actual_issue, comment = we.CreateIssue( |
| 1230 | 789, 'sum', 'New', 111, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], 'desc') |
| 1231 | |
| 1232 | self.assertEqual('proj', actual_issue.project_name) |
| 1233 | # Verify that tasks were queued to send email notifications. |
| 1234 | hostport = 'example.com' |
| 1235 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_once_with( |
| 1236 | actual_issue.issue_id, hostport, 111, comment_id=comment.id) |
| 1237 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_once_with( |
| 1238 | actual_issue.issue_id, hostport, [], 111) |
| 1239 | |
| 1240 | @mock.patch( |
| 1241 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1242 | @mock.patch( |
| 1243 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1244 | def testCreateIssue_DontSendEmail(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 1245 | """We can create an issue, without queueing notification tasks.""" |
| 1246 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1247 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1248 | actual_issue, comment = we.CreateIssue( |
| 1249 | 789, |
| 1250 | 'sum', |
| 1251 | 'New', |
| 1252 | 111, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], |
| 1253 | 'desc', |
| 1254 | send_email=False) |
| 1255 | self.assertEqual(789, actual_issue.project_id) |
| 1256 | self.assertEqual('sum', actual_issue.summary) |
| 1257 | self.assertEqual('New', actual_issue.status) |
| 1258 | self.assertEqual('desc', comment.content) |
| 1259 | |
| 1260 | # Verify that tasks were not queued to send email notifications. |
| 1261 | self.assertEqual([], fake_pasicn.mock_calls) |
| 1262 | self.assertEqual([], fake_pasibn.mock_calls) |
| 1263 | |
| 1264 | @mock.patch( |
| 1265 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1266 | @mock.patch( |
| 1267 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1268 | def testCreateIssue_ImportedIssue_Allowed(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1269 | """We can create an imported issue, if the requester has permission.""" |
| 1270 | PAST_TIME = 123456 |
| 1271 | self.project.extra_perms = [project_pb2.Project.ExtraPerms( |
| 1272 | member_id=111, perms=['ImportComment'])] |
| 1273 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1274 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1275 | actual_issue, comment = we.CreateIssue( |
| 1276 | 789, |
| 1277 | 'sum', |
| 1278 | 'New', |
| 1279 | 111, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], |
| 1280 | 'desc', |
| 1281 | send_email=False, |
| 1282 | reporter_id=222, |
| 1283 | timestamp=PAST_TIME) |
| 1284 | self.assertEqual(789, actual_issue.project_id) |
| 1285 | self.assertEqual('sum', actual_issue.summary) |
| 1286 | self.assertEqual(222, actual_issue.reporter_id) |
| 1287 | self.assertEqual(PAST_TIME, actual_issue.opened_timestamp) |
| 1288 | self.assertEqual(222, comment.user_id) |
| 1289 | self.assertEqual(111, comment.importer_id) |
| 1290 | self.assertEqual(PAST_TIME, comment.timestamp) |
| 1291 | |
| 1292 | @mock.patch( |
| 1293 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1294 | @mock.patch( |
| 1295 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1296 | def testCreateIssue_ImportedIssue_Denied(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1297 | """We can refuse to import an issue, if requester lacks permission.""" |
| 1298 | PAST_TIME = 123456 |
| 1299 | # Note: no "ImportComment" permission is granted. |
| 1300 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1301 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1302 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1303 | we.CreateIssue( |
| 1304 | 789, 'sum', 'New', 222, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], 'desc', |
| 1305 | send_email=False, reporter_id=222, timestamp=PAST_TIME) |
| 1306 | |
| 1307 | @mock.patch( |
| 1308 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1309 | @mock.patch( |
| 1310 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1311 | def testCreateIssue_OnwerValidation(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1312 | """We validate the owner.""" |
| 1313 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1314 | with self.assertRaisesRegexp(exceptions.InputException, |
| 1315 | 'Issue owner must be a project member'): |
| 1316 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1317 | # user_id 222 is not a project member |
| 1318 | we.CreateIssue(789, 'sum', 'New', 222, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], 'desc') |
| 1319 | |
| 1320 | @mock.patch( |
| 1321 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1322 | @mock.patch( |
| 1323 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1324 | def testCreateIssue_SummaryValidation(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1325 | """We validate the summary.""" |
| 1326 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1327 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1328 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1329 | # Summary cannot be empty |
| 1330 | we.CreateIssue(789, '', 'New', 111, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], 'desc') |
| 1331 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1332 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1333 | # Summary cannot be only spaces |
| 1334 | we.CreateIssue(789, ' ', 'New', 111, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], 'desc') |
| 1335 | |
| 1336 | @mock.patch( |
| 1337 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1338 | @mock.patch( |
| 1339 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1340 | def testCreateIssue_DescriptionValidation(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1341 | """We validate the description.""" |
| 1342 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1343 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1344 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1345 | # Description cannot be empty |
| 1346 | we.CreateIssue(789, 'sum', 'New', 111, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], '') |
| 1347 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1348 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1349 | # Description cannot be only spaces |
| 1350 | we.CreateIssue(789, 'sum', 'New', 111, [333], ['Hot'], [], [], ' ') |
| 1351 | |
| 1352 | @mock.patch( |
| 1353 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1354 | @mock.patch( |
| 1355 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1356 | def testCreateIssue_FieldValueValidation(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1357 | """We validate field values against field definitions.""" |
| 1358 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1359 | # field_def_1 has a max of 10. |
| 1360 | fv = fake.MakeFieldValue(field_id=self.field_def_1.field_id, int_value=11) |
| 1361 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1362 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1363 | we.CreateIssue(789, 'sum', 'New', 111, [], [], [fv], [], '') |
| 1364 | |
| 1365 | @mock.patch( |
| 1366 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1367 | @mock.patch( |
| 1368 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1369 | def testCreateIssue_AppliesFilterRules(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1370 | """We apply filter rules.""" |
| 1371 | self.services.features.TestAddFilterRule( |
| 1372 | 789, '-has:component', add_labels=['no-component']) |
| 1373 | |
| 1374 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1375 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1376 | actual_issue, _ = we.CreateIssue( |
| 1377 | 789, 'sum', 'New', 111, [333], [], [], [], 'desc') |
| 1378 | self.assertEqual(len(actual_issue.derived_labels), 1) |
| 1379 | self.assertEqual(actual_issue.derived_labels[0], 'no-component') |
| 1380 | |
| 1381 | @mock.patch( |
| 1382 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1383 | @mock.patch( |
| 1384 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1385 | def testCreateIssue_RaiseFilterErrors(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1386 | """We raise FilterRuleException if filter rule should show error.""" |
| 1387 | self.services.features.TestAddFilterRule(789, '-has:component', error='er') |
| 1388 | PAST_TIME = 123456 |
| 1389 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1390 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.FilterRuleException): |
| 1391 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1392 | we.CreateIssue( |
| 1393 | 789, |
| 1394 | 'sum', |
| 1395 | 'New', |
| 1396 | 111, [], [], [], [], |
| 1397 | 'desc', |
| 1398 | send_email=False, |
| 1399 | timestamp=PAST_TIME) |
| 1400 | |
| 1401 | @mock.patch( |
| 1402 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1403 | @mock.patch( |
| 1404 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1405 | def testCreateIssue_IgnoresFilterErrors(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1406 | """We can apply filter rules and ignore resulting errors.""" |
| 1407 | self.services.features.TestAddFilterRule(789, '-has:component', error='er') |
| 1408 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1409 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1410 | actual_issue, _ = we.CreateIssue( |
| 1411 | 789, |
| 1412 | 'sum', |
| 1413 | 'New', |
| 1414 | 111, [], [], [], [], |
| 1415 | 'desc', |
| 1416 | send_email=False, |
| 1417 | raise_filter_errors=False) |
| 1418 | self.assertEqual(len(actual_issue.component_ids), 0) |
| 1419 | |
| 1420 | def testMakeIssueFromDelta(self): |
| 1421 | # TODO(crbug/monorail/7197): implement tests |
| 1422 | pass |
| 1423 | |
| 1424 | @mock.patch( |
| 1425 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1426 | @mock.patch( |
| 1427 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1428 | def testMakeIssue_Normal(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1429 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1430 | fd_id = self.services.config.CreateFieldDef( |
| 1431 | self.cnxn, |
| 1432 | self.project.project_id, |
| 1433 | 'Restricted-Foo', |
| 1434 | 'STR_TYPE', |
| 1435 | None, |
| 1436 | None, |
| 1437 | None, |
| 1438 | None, |
| 1439 | None, |
| 1440 | None, |
| 1441 | None, |
| 1442 | None, |
| 1443 | None, |
| 1444 | None, |
| 1445 | None, |
| 1446 | None, |
| 1447 | None, |
| 1448 | None, [], [111], |
| 1449 | is_restricted_field=True) |
| 1450 | input_fv = tracker_pb2.FieldValue(field_id=fd_id, str_value='Bar') |
| 1451 | input_issue = tracker_pb2.Issue( |
| 1452 | project_id=789, |
| 1453 | owner_id=111, |
| 1454 | summary='sum', |
| 1455 | status='New', |
| 1456 | field_values=[input_fv]) |
| 1457 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1458 | actual_issue = we.MakeIssue(input_issue, 'description', False) |
| 1459 | self.assertEqual(actual_issue.project_id, 789) |
| 1460 | self.assertEqual(actual_issue.summary, 'sum') |
| 1461 | self.assertEqual(actual_issue.status, 'New') |
| 1462 | self.assertEqual(actual_issue.reporter_id, 111) |
| 1463 | self.assertEqual(actual_issue.field_values, [input_fv]) |
| 1464 | |
| 1465 | @mock.patch( |
| 1466 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1467 | @mock.patch( |
| 1468 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1469 | def testMakeIssue_ChecksRestrictedFields(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1470 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 1471 | fd_id = self.services.config.CreateFieldDef( |
| 1472 | self.cnxn, |
| 1473 | self.project.project_id, |
| 1474 | 'Restricted-Foo', |
| 1475 | 'STR_TYPE', |
| 1476 | None, |
| 1477 | None, |
| 1478 | None, |
| 1479 | None, |
| 1480 | None, |
| 1481 | None, |
| 1482 | None, |
| 1483 | None, |
| 1484 | None, |
| 1485 | None, |
| 1486 | None, |
| 1487 | None, |
| 1488 | None, |
| 1489 | None, [], [111], |
| 1490 | is_restricted_field=True) |
| 1491 | input_fv = tracker_pb2.FieldValue(field_id=fd_id, str_value='Bar') |
| 1492 | input_issue = tracker_pb2.Issue( |
| 1493 | project_id=789, summary='sum', status='New', field_values=[input_fv]) |
| 1494 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1495 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1496 | we.MakeIssue(input_issue, 'description', False) |
| 1497 | |
| 1498 | @mock.patch( |
| 1499 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 1500 | @mock.patch( |
| 1501 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 1502 | def testMakeIssue_ChecksRestrictedLabels(self, _fake_pasicn, _fake_pasibn): |
| 1503 | """Also checks restricted field that are masked as labels.""" |
| 1504 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 1505 | self.services.config.CreateFieldDef( |
| 1506 | self.cnxn, |
| 1507 | self.project.project_id, |
| 1508 | 'Rfoo', |
| 1509 | 'ENUM_TYPE', |
| 1510 | None, |
| 1511 | None, |
| 1512 | None, |
| 1513 | None, |
| 1514 | None, |
| 1515 | None, |
| 1516 | None, |
| 1517 | None, |
| 1518 | None, |
| 1519 | None, |
| 1520 | None, |
| 1521 | None, |
| 1522 | None, |
| 1523 | None, [], [111], |
| 1524 | is_restricted_field=True) |
| 1525 | input_issue = tracker_pb2.Issue( |
| 1526 | project_id=789, summary='sum', status='New', labels=['Rfoo-bar']) |
| 1527 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1528 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1529 | we.MakeIssue(input_issue, 'description', False) |
| 1530 | |
| 1531 | @mock.patch('services.tracker_fulltext.IndexIssues') |
| 1532 | @mock.patch('services.tracker_fulltext.UnindexIssues') |
| 1533 | def testMoveIssue_Normal(self, mock_unindex, mock_index): |
| 1534 | """We can move issues.""" |
| 1535 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1536 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1537 | self.project.owner_ids = [111] |
| 1538 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1539 | 'dest', project_id=988, committer_ids=[111]) |
| 1540 | |
| 1541 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1542 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1543 | moved_issue = we.MoveIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1544 | |
| 1545 | self.assertEqual(moved_issue.project_name, 'dest') |
| 1546 | self.assertEqual(moved_issue.local_id, 1) |
| 1547 | |
| 1548 | moved_issue = self.services.issue.GetIssueByLocalID( |
| 1549 | 'cnxn', target_project.project_id, 1) |
| 1550 | self.assertEqual(target_project.project_id, moved_issue.project_id) |
| 1551 | self.assertEqual(issue.summary, moved_issue.summary) |
| 1552 | self.assertEqual(moved_issue.reporter_id, 111) |
| 1553 | |
| 1554 | mock_unindex.assert_called_once_with([issue.issue_id]) |
| 1555 | mock_index.assert_called_once_with( |
| 1556 | self.mr.cnxn, [issue], self.services.user, self.services.issue, |
| 1557 | self.services.config) |
| 1558 | |
| 1559 | @mock.patch('services.tracker_fulltext.IndexIssues') |
| 1560 | @mock.patch('services.tracker_fulltext.UnindexIssues') |
| 1561 | def testMoveIssue_MoveBackAgain(self, _mock_unindex, _mock_index): |
| 1562 | """We can move issues backt and get the old id.""" |
| 1563 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1564 | issue.project_name = 'proj' |
| 1565 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1566 | self.project.owner_ids = [111] |
| 1567 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1568 | 'dest', project_id=988, owner_ids=[111]) |
| 1569 | |
| 1570 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1571 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1572 | moved_issue = we.MoveIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1573 | moved_issue = we.MoveIssue(moved_issue, self.project) |
| 1574 | |
| 1575 | self.assertEqual(moved_issue.project_name, 'proj') |
| 1576 | self.assertEqual(moved_issue.local_id, 1) |
| 1577 | |
| 1578 | moved_issue = self.services.issue.GetIssueByLocalID( |
| 1579 | 'cnxn', self.project.project_id, 1) |
| 1580 | self.assertEqual(self.project.project_id, moved_issue.project_id) |
| 1581 | |
| 1582 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 1583 | self.assertEqual( |
| 1584 | comments[1].content, 'Moved issue proj:1 to now be issue dest:1.') |
| 1585 | self.assertEqual( |
| 1586 | comments[2].content, 'Moved issue dest:1 back to issue proj:1 again.') |
| 1587 | |
| 1588 | def testMoveIssue_Anon(self): |
| 1589 | """Anon can't move issues.""" |
| 1590 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1591 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1592 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1593 | 'dest', project_id=988) |
| 1594 | |
| 1595 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1596 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1597 | we.MoveIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1598 | |
| 1599 | def testMoveIssue_CantDeleteIssue(self): |
| 1600 | """We can't move issues if we don't have DeleteIssue perm on the issue.""" |
| 1601 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1602 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1603 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1604 | 'dest', project_id=988, committer_ids=[111]) |
| 1605 | |
| 1606 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1607 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1608 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1609 | we.MoveIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1610 | |
| 1611 | def testMoveIssue_CantEditIssueOnTargetProject(self): |
| 1612 | """We can't move issues if we don't have EditIssue perm on target.""" |
| 1613 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1614 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1615 | self.project.owner_ids = [111] |
| 1616 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1617 | 'dest', project_id=989) |
| 1618 | |
| 1619 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1620 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1621 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1622 | we.MoveIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1623 | |
| 1624 | def testMoveIssue_CantRestrictions(self): |
| 1625 | """We can't move issues if they have restriction labels.""" |
| 1626 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1627 | issue.labels = ['Restrict-Foo-Bar'] |
| 1628 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1629 | self.project.owner_ids = [111] |
| 1630 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1631 | 'dest', project_id=989, committer_ids=[111]) |
| 1632 | |
| 1633 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1634 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1635 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1636 | we.MoveIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1637 | |
| 1638 | def testMoveIssue_TooLongIssue(self): |
| 1639 | """We can't move issues if the comment is too long.""" |
| 1640 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1641 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1642 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1643 | 'dest', project_id=988, committer_ids=[111]) |
| 1644 | |
| 1645 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1646 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1647 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1648 | we.MoveIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1649 | |
| 1650 | @mock.patch('services.tracker_fulltext.IndexIssues') |
| 1651 | def testCopyIssue_Normal(self, mock_index): |
| 1652 | """We can copy issues.""" |
| 1653 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 1654 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901, project_name='proj') |
| 1655 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1656 | self.project.owner_ids = [111] |
| 1657 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1658 | 'dest', project_id=988, committer_ids=[111]) |
| 1659 | |
| 1660 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1661 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1662 | copied_issue = we.CopyIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1663 | |
| 1664 | self.assertEqual(copied_issue.project_name, 'dest') |
| 1665 | self.assertEqual(copied_issue.local_id, 1) |
| 1666 | |
| 1667 | # Original issue should still exist. |
| 1668 | self.services.issue.GetIssueByLocalID('cnxn', 789, 1) |
| 1669 | |
| 1670 | copied_issue = self.services.issue.GetIssueByLocalID( |
| 1671 | 'cnxn', target_project.project_id, 1) |
| 1672 | self.assertEqual(target_project.project_id, copied_issue.project_id) |
| 1673 | self.assertEqual(issue.summary, copied_issue.summary) |
| 1674 | self.assertEqual(copied_issue.reporter_id, 111) |
| 1675 | |
| 1676 | mock_index.assert_called_once_with( |
| 1677 | self.mr.cnxn, [copied_issue], self.services.user, self.services.issue, |
| 1678 | self.services.config) |
| 1679 | |
| 1680 | comment = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue( |
| 1681 | 'cnxn', copied_issue.issue_id)[-1] |
| 1682 | self.assertEqual(1, len(comment.amendments)) |
| 1683 | amendment = comment.amendments[0] |
| 1684 | self.assertEqual( |
| 1685 | tracker_pb2.Amendment( |
| 1686 | field=tracker_pb2.FieldID.PROJECT, |
| 1687 | newvalue='dest', |
| 1688 | added_user_ids=[], |
| 1689 | removed_user_ids=[]), |
| 1690 | amendment) |
| 1691 | |
| 1692 | @mock.patch('services.tracker_fulltext.IndexIssues') |
| 1693 | def testCopyIssue_SameProject(self, mock_index): |
| 1694 | """We can copy issues.""" |
| 1695 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 1696 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901, project_name='proj') |
| 1697 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1698 | self.project.owner_ids = [111] |
| 1699 | target_project = self.project |
| 1700 | |
| 1701 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1702 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1703 | copied_issue = we.CopyIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1704 | |
| 1705 | self.assertEqual(copied_issue.project_name, 'proj') |
| 1706 | self.assertEqual(copied_issue.local_id, 2) |
| 1707 | |
| 1708 | # Original issue should still exist. |
| 1709 | self.services.issue.GetIssueByLocalID('cnxn', 789, 1) |
| 1710 | |
| 1711 | copied_issue = self.services.issue.GetIssueByLocalID( |
| 1712 | 'cnxn', target_project.project_id, 2) |
| 1713 | self.assertEqual(target_project.project_id, copied_issue.project_id) |
| 1714 | self.assertEqual(issue.summary, copied_issue.summary) |
| 1715 | self.assertEqual(copied_issue.reporter_id, 111) |
| 1716 | |
| 1717 | mock_index.assert_called_once_with( |
| 1718 | self.mr.cnxn, [copied_issue], self.services.user, self.services.issue, |
| 1719 | self.services.config) |
| 1720 | comment = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue( |
| 1721 | 'cnxn', copied_issue.issue_id)[-1] |
| 1722 | self.assertEqual(0, len(comment.amendments)) |
| 1723 | |
| 1724 | def testCopyIssue_Anon(self): |
| 1725 | """Anon can't copy issues.""" |
| 1726 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1727 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1728 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1729 | 'dest', project_id=988) |
| 1730 | |
| 1731 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1732 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1733 | we.CopyIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1734 | |
| 1735 | def testCopyIssue_CantDeleteIssue(self): |
| 1736 | """We can't copy issues if we don't have DeleteIssue perm on the issue.""" |
| 1737 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1738 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1739 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1740 | 'dest', project_id=988, committer_ids=[111]) |
| 1741 | |
| 1742 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1743 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1744 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1745 | we.CopyIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1746 | |
| 1747 | def testCopyIssue_CantEditIssueOnTargetProject(self): |
| 1748 | """We can't copy issues if we don't have EditIssue perm on target.""" |
| 1749 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1750 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1751 | self.project.owner_ids = [111] |
| 1752 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1753 | 'dest', project_id=989) |
| 1754 | |
| 1755 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1756 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1757 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1758 | we.CopyIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1759 | |
| 1760 | def testCopyIssue_CantRestrictions(self): |
| 1761 | """We can't copy issues if they have restriction labels.""" |
| 1762 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1763 | issue.labels = ['Restrict-Foo-Bar'] |
| 1764 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1765 | self.project.owner_ids = [111] |
| 1766 | target_project = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1767 | 'dest', project_id=989, committer_ids=[111]) |
| 1768 | |
| 1769 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 1770 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1771 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1772 | we.CopyIssue(issue, target_project) |
| 1773 | |
| 1774 | @mock.patch('search.frontendsearchpipeline.FrontendSearchPipeline') |
| 1775 | def testSearchIssues(self, mocked_pipeline): |
| 1776 | mocked_instance = mocked_pipeline.return_value |
| 1777 | mocked_instance.total_count = 10 |
| 1778 | mocked_instance.visible_results = ['a', 'b'] |
| 1779 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1780 | actual = we.SearchIssues('', ['proj'], 123, 20, 0, '') |
| 1781 | expected = work_env.ListResult(['a', 'b'], None) |
| 1782 | self.assertEqual(actual, expected) |
| 1783 | |
| 1784 | @mock.patch('search.frontendsearchpipeline.FrontendSearchPipeline') |
| 1785 | def testSearchIssues_paginates(self, mocked_pipeline): |
| 1786 | mocked_instance = mocked_pipeline.return_value |
| 1787 | mocked_instance.total_count = 50 |
| 1788 | mocked_instance.visible_results = ['a', 'b'] |
| 1789 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1790 | actual = we.SearchIssues('', ['proj'], 123, 20, 0, '') |
| 1791 | expected = work_env.ListResult(['a', 'b'], 20) |
| 1792 | self.assertEqual(actual, expected) |
| 1793 | |
| 1794 | @mock.patch('search.frontendsearchpipeline.FrontendSearchPipeline') |
| 1795 | def testSearchIssues_NoSuchProject(self, mocked_pipeline): |
| 1796 | mocked_instance = mocked_pipeline.return_value |
| 1797 | mocked_instance.total_count = 10 |
| 1798 | mocked_instance.visible_results = ['a', 'b'] |
| 1799 | |
| 1800 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchProjectException): |
| 1801 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1802 | we.SearchIssues('', ['chicken'], 123, 20, 0, '') |
| 1803 | |
| 1804 | @mock.patch('search.frontendsearchpipeline.FrontendSearchPipeline') |
| 1805 | def testListIssues_Normal(self, mocked_pipeline): |
| 1806 | """We can do a query that generates some results.""" |
| 1807 | mocked_instance = mocked_pipeline.return_value |
| 1808 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1809 | actual = we.ListIssues('', ['a'], 123, 20, 0, 1, '', '', True) |
| 1810 | self.assertEqual(actual, mocked_instance) |
| 1811 | mocked_instance.SearchForIIDs.assert_called_once() |
| 1812 | mocked_instance.MergeAndSortIssues.assert_called_once() |
| 1813 | mocked_instance.Paginate.assert_called_once() |
| 1814 | |
| 1815 | def testListIssues_Error(self): |
| 1816 | """Errors are safely reported.""" |
| 1817 | pass # TODO(jrobbins): add unit test |
| 1818 | |
| 1819 | def testFindIssuePositionInSearch_Normal(self): |
| 1820 | """We can find an issue position for the flipper.""" |
| 1821 | pass # TODO(jrobbins): add unit test |
| 1822 | |
| 1823 | def testFindIssuePositionInSearch_Error(self): |
| 1824 | """Errors are safely reported.""" |
| 1825 | pass # TODO(jrobbins): add unit test |
| 1826 | |
| 1827 | def testGetIssuesDict_Normal(self): |
| 1828 | """We can get an existing issue by issue_id.""" |
| 1829 | issue_1 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1830 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_1) |
| 1831 | issue_2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78902) |
| 1832 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_2) |
| 1833 | |
| 1834 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1835 | actual = we.GetIssuesDict([78901, 78902]) |
| 1836 | |
| 1837 | self.assertEqual({78901: issue_1, 78902: issue_2}, actual) |
| 1838 | |
| 1839 | def testGetIssuesDict_NoPermission(self): |
| 1840 | """We reject attempts to get issues the user cannot view.""" |
| 1841 | issue_1 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1842 | issue_1.labels = ['Restrict-View-CoreTeam'] |
| 1843 | issue_1.project_name = 'farm-proj' |
| 1844 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_1) |
| 1845 | issue_2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78902) |
| 1846 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_2) |
| 1847 | issue_3 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 3, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78903) |
| 1848 | issue_3.labels = ['Restrict-View-CoreTeam'] |
| 1849 | issue_3.project_name = 'farm-proj' |
| 1850 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_3) |
| 1851 | with self.assertRaisesRegexp( |
| 1852 | permissions.PermissionException, |
| 1853 | 'User is not allowed to view issue: farm-proj:1.\n' + |
| 1854 | 'User is not allowed to view issue: farm-proj:3.'): |
| 1855 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1856 | we.GetIssuesDict([78901, 78902, 78903]) |
| 1857 | |
| 1858 | def testGetIssuesDict_NoSuchIssue(self): |
| 1859 | """We reject attempts to get a non-existent issue.""" |
| 1860 | issue_1 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1861 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_1) |
| 1862 | with self.assertRaisesRegexp(exceptions.NoSuchIssueException, |
| 1863 | 'No such issue: 78902\nNo such issue: 78903'): |
| 1864 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1865 | _actual = we.GetIssuesDict([78901, 78902, 78903]) |
| 1866 | |
| 1867 | def testGetIssue_Normal(self): |
| 1868 | """We can get an existing issue by issue_id.""" |
| 1869 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1870 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1871 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1872 | actual = we.GetIssue(78901) |
| 1873 | |
| 1874 | self.assertEqual(issue, actual) |
| 1875 | |
| 1876 | def testGetIssue_NoPermission(self): |
| 1877 | """We reject attempts to get an issue we don't have permission for.""" |
| 1878 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1879 | issue.labels = ['Restrict-View-CoreTeam'] |
| 1880 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1881 | |
| 1882 | # We should get a permission exception |
| 1883 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 1884 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1885 | _actual = we.GetIssue(78901) |
| 1886 | |
| 1887 | # ...unless we have permission to see the issue |
| 1888 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 1889 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1890 | actual = we.GetIssue(78901) |
| 1891 | self.assertEqual(issue, actual) |
| 1892 | |
| 1893 | def testGetIssue_NoneIssue(self): |
| 1894 | """We reject attempts to get a none issue.""" |
| 1895 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1896 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1897 | _actual = we.GetIssue(None) |
| 1898 | |
| 1899 | def testGetIssue_NoSuchIssue(self): |
| 1900 | """We reject attempts to get a non-existent issue.""" |
| 1901 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchIssueException): |
| 1902 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1903 | _actual = we.GetIssue(78901) |
| 1904 | |
| 1905 | def testListReferencedIssues(self): |
| 1906 | """We return only existing or visible issues even w/out project names.""" |
| 1907 | ref_tuples = [ |
| 1908 | (None, 1), ('other-proj', 1), ('proj', 99), |
| 1909 | ('ghost-proj', 1), ('proj', 42), ('other-proj', 1)] |
| 1910 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1911 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1912 | private = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 42, 'sum', 'New', 422, issue_id=78942) |
| 1913 | private.labels.append('Restrict-View-CoreTeam') |
| 1914 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(private) |
| 1915 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 1916 | 'other-proj', project_id=788) |
| 1917 | other_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 1918 | 788, 1, 'sum', 'Fixed', 111, issue_id=78801) |
| 1919 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(other_issue) |
| 1920 | |
| 1921 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1922 | actual_open, actual_closed = we.ListReferencedIssues(ref_tuples, 'proj') |
| 1923 | |
| 1924 | self.assertEqual([issue], actual_open) |
| 1925 | self.assertEqual([other_issue], actual_closed) |
| 1926 | |
| 1927 | def testListReferencedIssues_PreservesOrder(self): |
| 1928 | ref_tuples = [('proj', i) for i in range(1, 10)] |
| 1929 | # Duplicate some ref_tuples. The result should have no duplicated issues, |
| 1930 | # with only the first occurrence being preserved. |
| 1931 | ref_tuples += [('proj', 1), ('proj', 5)] |
| 1932 | expected_open = [ |
| 1933 | fake.MakeTestIssue(789, i, 'sum', 'New', 111) for i in range(1, 5)] |
| 1934 | expected_closed = [ |
| 1935 | fake.MakeTestIssue(789, i, 'sum', 'Fixed', 111) for i in range(5, 10)] |
| 1936 | for issue in expected_open + expected_closed: |
| 1937 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1938 | |
| 1939 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1940 | actual_open, actual_closed = we.ListReferencedIssues(ref_tuples, 'proj') |
| 1941 | |
| 1942 | self.assertEqual(expected_open, actual_open) |
| 1943 | self.assertEqual(expected_closed, actual_closed) |
| 1944 | |
| 1945 | def testGetIssueByLocalID_Normal(self): |
| 1946 | """We can get an existing issue by project_id and local_id.""" |
| 1947 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 1948 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1949 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1950 | actual = we.GetIssueByLocalID(789, 1) |
| 1951 | |
| 1952 | self.assertEqual(issue, actual) |
| 1953 | |
| 1954 | def testGetIssueByLocalID_ProjectNotSpecified(self): |
| 1955 | """We reject calls with missing information.""" |
| 1956 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1957 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1958 | _actual = we.GetIssueByLocalID(None, 1) |
| 1959 | |
| 1960 | def testGetIssueByLocalID_IssueNotSpecified(self): |
| 1961 | """We reject calls with missing information.""" |
| 1962 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 1963 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1964 | _actual = we.GetIssueByLocalID(789, None) |
| 1965 | |
| 1966 | def testGetIssueByLocalID_NoSuchIssue(self): |
| 1967 | """We reject attempts to get a non-existent issue.""" |
| 1968 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchIssueException): |
| 1969 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1970 | _actual = we.GetIssueByLocalID(789, 1) |
| 1971 | |
| 1972 | def testGetRelatedIssueRefs_None(self): |
| 1973 | """We handle issues that have no related issues.""" |
| 1974 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111) |
| 1975 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1976 | |
| 1977 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1978 | actual = we.GetRelatedIssueRefs([issue]) |
| 1979 | |
| 1980 | self.assertEqual({}, actual) |
| 1981 | |
| 1982 | def testGetRelatedIssueRefs_Some(self): |
| 1983 | """We can get refs for related issues of a given issue.""" |
| 1984 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111) |
| 1985 | sooner = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj') |
| 1986 | later = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 3, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj') |
| 1987 | better = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 4, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj') |
| 1988 | issue.blocked_on_iids.append(sooner.issue_id) |
| 1989 | issue.blocking_iids.append(later.issue_id) |
| 1990 | issue.merged_into = better.issue_id |
| 1991 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 1992 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(sooner) |
| 1993 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(later) |
| 1994 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(better) |
| 1995 | |
| 1996 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 1997 | actual = we.GetRelatedIssueRefs([issue]) |
| 1998 | |
| 1999 | self.assertEqual( |
| 2000 | {sooner.issue_id: ('proj', 2), |
| 2001 | later.issue_id: ('proj', 3), |
| 2002 | better.issue_id: ('proj', 4)}, |
| 2003 | actual) |
| 2004 | |
| 2005 | def testGetRelatedIssueRefs_MultipleIssues(self): |
| 2006 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111) |
| 2007 | blocking = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 2008 | 789, 2, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj') |
| 2009 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 3, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj') |
| 2010 | blocked_on = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 2011 | 789, 4, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj') |
| 2012 | issue3 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 5, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj') |
| 2013 | merged_into = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 2014 | 789, 6, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj') |
| 2015 | |
| 2016 | issue.blocked_on_iids.append(blocked_on.issue_id) |
| 2017 | issue2.blocking_iids.append(blocking.issue_id) |
| 2018 | issue3.merged_into = merged_into.issue_id |
| 2019 | |
| 2020 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2021 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 2022 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue3) |
| 2023 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(blocked_on) |
| 2024 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(blocking) |
| 2025 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(merged_into) |
| 2026 | |
| 2027 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2028 | actual = we.GetRelatedIssueRefs([issue, issue2, issue3]) |
| 2029 | |
| 2030 | self.assertEqual( |
| 2031 | {blocking.issue_id: ('proj', 2), |
| 2032 | blocked_on.issue_id: ('proj', 4), |
| 2033 | merged_into.issue_id: ('proj', 6)}, |
| 2034 | actual) |
| 2035 | |
| 2036 | def testGetIssueRefs(self): |
| 2037 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj1') |
| 2038 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 3, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj') |
| 2039 | issue3 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 5, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj') |
| 2040 | |
| 2041 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2042 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 2043 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue3) |
| 2044 | |
| 2045 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2046 | actual = we.GetIssueRefs( |
| 2047 | [issue.issue_id, issue2.issue_id, issue3.issue_id]) |
| 2048 | |
| 2049 | self.assertEqual( |
| 2050 | {issue.issue_id: ('proj1', 1), |
| 2051 | issue2.issue_id: ('proj', 3), |
| 2052 | issue3.issue_id: ('proj', 5)}, |
| 2053 | actual) |
| 2054 | |
| 2055 | @mock.patch('businesslogic.work_env.WorkEnv.UpdateIssueApproval') |
| 2056 | def testBulkUpdateIssueApprovals(self, mockUpdateIssueApproval): |
| 2057 | updated_issues = [78901, 78902] |
| 2058 | def side_effect(issue_id, *_args, **_kwargs): |
| 2059 | if issue_id in [78903]: |
| 2060 | raise permissions.PermissionException |
| 2061 | if issue_id in [78904, 78905]: |
| 2062 | raise exceptions.NoSuchIssueApprovalException |
| 2063 | mockUpdateIssueApproval.side_effect = side_effect |
| 2064 | |
| 2065 | self.SignIn() |
| 2066 | |
| 2067 | approval_delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta() |
| 2068 | issue_ids = self.work_env.BulkUpdateIssueApprovals( |
| 2069 | [78901, 78902, 78903, 78904, 78905], 24, self.project, approval_delta, |
| 2070 | 'comment', send_email=True) |
| 2071 | self.assertEqual(issue_ids, updated_issues) |
| 2072 | updateIssueApprovalCalls = [ |
| 2073 | mock.call( |
| 2074 | 78901, 24, approval_delta, 'comment', False, send_email=False), |
| 2075 | mock.call( |
| 2076 | 78902, 24, approval_delta, 'comment', False, send_email=False), |
| 2077 | mock.call( |
| 2078 | 78903, 24, approval_delta, 'comment', False, send_email=False), |
| 2079 | mock.call( |
| 2080 | 78904, 24, approval_delta, 'comment', False, send_email=False), |
| 2081 | mock.call( |
| 2082 | 78905, 24, approval_delta, 'comment', False, send_email=False), |
| 2083 | ] |
| 2084 | self.assertEqual( |
| 2085 | mockUpdateIssueApproval.call_count, len(updateIssueApprovalCalls)) |
| 2086 | mockUpdateIssueApproval.assert_has_calls(updateIssueApprovalCalls) |
| 2087 | |
| 2088 | def testBulkUpdateIssueApprovals_AnonUser(self): |
| 2089 | approval_delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta() |
| 2090 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 2091 | self.work_env.BulkUpdateIssueApprovals( |
| 2092 | [], 24, self.project, approval_delta, |
| 2093 | 'comment', send_email=True) |
| 2094 | |
| 2095 | def testBulkUpdateIssueApprovals_UserLacksViewPerms(self): |
| 2096 | approval_delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta() |
| 2097 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 2098 | self.project.access = project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY |
| 2099 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 2100 | self.work_env.BulkUpdateIssueApprovals( |
| 2101 | [], 24, self.project, approval_delta, |
| 2102 | 'comment', send_email=True) |
| 2103 | |
| 2104 | @mock.patch('businesslogic.work_env.WorkEnv.UpdateIssueApproval') |
| 2105 | def testBulkUpdateIssueApprovalsV3(self, mockUpdateIssueApproval): |
| 2106 | |
| 2107 | def side_effect(issue_id, approval_id, *_args, **_kwargs): |
| 2108 | return ( |
| 2109 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue(approval_id=approval_id), |
| 2110 | tracker_pb2.IssueComment(issue_id=issue_id), |
| 2111 | tracker_pb2.Issue(issue_id=issue_id)) |
| 2112 | |
| 2113 | mockUpdateIssueApproval.side_effect = side_effect |
| 2114 | |
| 2115 | self.SignIn() |
| 2116 | |
| 2117 | approval_delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta() |
| 2118 | approval_delta_2 = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta(approver_ids_add=[111]) |
| 2119 | deltas_by_issue = [ |
| 2120 | (78901, 1, approval_delta), |
| 2121 | (78901, 1, approval_delta), |
| 2122 | (78901, 2, approval_delta), |
| 2123 | (78901, 2, approval_delta_2), |
| 2124 | (78902, 24, approval_delta), |
| 2125 | ] |
| 2126 | updated_approval_values = self.work_env.BulkUpdateIssueApprovalsV3( |
| 2127 | deltas_by_issue, 'xyz', send_email=True) |
| 2128 | expected = [] |
| 2129 | for iid, aid, _delta in deltas_by_issue: |
| 2130 | issue_approval_value_pair = ( |
| 2131 | tracker_pb2.Issue(issue_id=iid), |
| 2132 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue(approval_id=aid)) |
| 2133 | expected.append(issue_approval_value_pair) |
| 2134 | |
| 2135 | self.assertEqual(updated_approval_values, expected) |
| 2136 | updateIssueApprovalCalls = [] |
| 2137 | for iid, aid, delta in deltas_by_issue: |
| 2138 | mock_call = mock.call( |
| 2139 | iid, aid, delta, 'xyz', False, send_email=True, update_perms=True) |
| 2140 | updateIssueApprovalCalls.append(mock_call) |
| 2141 | self.assertEqual(mockUpdateIssueApproval.call_count, len(deltas_by_issue)) |
| 2142 | mockUpdateIssueApproval.assert_has_calls(updateIssueApprovalCalls) |
| 2143 | |
| 2144 | @mock.patch('businesslogic.work_env.WorkEnv.UpdateIssueApproval') |
| 2145 | def testBulkUpdateIssueApprovalsV3_PermError(self, mockUpdateIssueApproval): |
| 2146 | mockUpdateIssueApproval.side_effect = mock.Mock( |
| 2147 | side_effect=permissions.PermissionException()) |
| 2148 | approval_delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta() |
| 2149 | deltas_by_issue = [(78901, 1, approval_delta)] |
| 2150 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 2151 | self.work_env.BulkUpdateIssueApprovalsV3( |
| 2152 | deltas_by_issue, 'comment', send_email=True) |
| 2153 | |
| 2154 | @mock.patch('businesslogic.work_env.WorkEnv.UpdateIssueApproval') |
| 2155 | def testBulkUpdateIssueApprovalsV3_NotFound(self, mockUpdateIssueApproval): |
| 2156 | mockUpdateIssueApproval.side_effect = mock.Mock( |
| 2157 | side_effect=exceptions.NoSuchIssueApprovalException()) |
| 2158 | approval_delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta() |
| 2159 | deltas_by_issue = [(78901, 1, approval_delta)] |
| 2160 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchIssueApprovalException): |
| 2161 | self.work_env.BulkUpdateIssueApprovalsV3( |
| 2162 | deltas_by_issue, 'comment', send_email=True) |
| 2163 | |
| 2164 | def testBulkUpdateIssueApprovalsV3_UserLacksViewPerms(self): |
| 2165 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 2166 | self.project.access = project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY |
| 2167 | # No exception raised in v3. Permissions checked in UpdateIssueApprovals. |
| 2168 | self.work_env.BulkUpdateIssueApprovalsV3([], 'comment', send_email=True) |
| 2169 | |
| 2170 | @mock.patch( |
| 2171 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendApprovalChangeNotification') |
| 2172 | def testUpdateIssueApproval(self, _mockPrepareAndSend): |
| 2173 | """We can update an issue's approval_value.""" |
| 2174 | |
| 2175 | self.services.issue.DeltaUpdateIssueApproval = mock.Mock() |
| 2176 | |
| 2177 | self.SignIn() |
| 2178 | |
| 2179 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(789, [], []) |
| 2180 | self.services.config.StoreConfig('cnxn', config) |
| 2181 | |
| 2182 | av_24 = tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2183 | approval_id=24, approver_ids=[111], |
| 2184 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.NOT_SET, set_on=1234, setter_id=999) |
| 2185 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111, |
| 2186 | issue_id=78901, approval_values=[av_24]) |
| 2187 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2188 | |
| 2189 | delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta( |
| 2190 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.REVIEW_REQUESTED, |
| 2191 | set_on=2345, |
| 2192 | approver_ids_add=[222], |
| 2193 | setter_id=111) |
| 2194 | |
| 2195 | self.work_env.UpdateIssueApproval(78901, 24, delta, 'please review', False) |
| 2196 | |
| 2197 | self.services.issue.DeltaUpdateIssueApproval.assert_called_once_with( |
| 2198 | self.mr.cnxn, 111, config, issue, av_24, delta, |
| 2199 | comment_content='please review', is_description=False, attachments=None, |
| 2200 | kept_attachments=None) |
| 2201 | |
| 2202 | @mock.patch( |
| 2203 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendApprovalChangeNotification') |
| 2204 | def testUpdateIssueApproval_IsDescription(self, _mockPrepareAndSend): |
| 2205 | """We can update an issue's approval survey.""" |
| 2206 | |
| 2207 | self.services.issue.DeltaUpdateIssueApproval = mock.Mock() |
| 2208 | |
| 2209 | self.SignIn() |
| 2210 | |
| 2211 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(789, [], []) |
| 2212 | self.services.config.StoreConfig('cnxn', config) |
| 2213 | |
| 2214 | av_24 = tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue(approval_id=24) |
| 2215 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111, |
| 2216 | issue_id=78901, approval_values=[av_24]) |
| 2217 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2218 | |
| 2219 | delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta(setter_id=111) |
| 2220 | self.work_env.UpdateIssueApproval(78901, 24, delta, 'better response', True) |
| 2221 | |
| 2222 | self.services.issue.DeltaUpdateIssueApproval.assert_called_once_with( |
| 2223 | self.mr.cnxn, 111, config, issue, av_24, delta, |
| 2224 | comment_content='better response', is_description=True, |
| 2225 | attachments=None, kept_attachments=None) |
| 2226 | |
| 2227 | @mock.patch( |
| 2228 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendApprovalChangeNotification') |
| 2229 | def testUpdateIssueApproval_Attachments(self, _mockPrepareAndSend): |
| 2230 | """We can attach files as we many an approval change.""" |
| 2231 | self.services.issue.DeltaUpdateIssueApproval = mock.Mock() |
| 2232 | |
| 2233 | self.SignIn() |
| 2234 | |
| 2235 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(789, [], []) |
| 2236 | self.services.config.StoreConfig('cnxn', config) |
| 2237 | |
| 2238 | av_24 = tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2239 | approval_id=24, approver_ids=[111], |
| 2240 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.NOT_SET, set_on=1234, setter_id=999) |
| 2241 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111, |
| 2242 | issue_id=78901, approval_values=[av_24]) |
| 2243 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2244 | |
| 2245 | delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta( |
| 2246 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.REVIEW_REQUESTED, |
| 2247 | set_on=2345, |
| 2248 | approver_ids_add=[222], |
| 2249 | setter_id=111) |
| 2250 | attachments = [] |
| 2251 | self.work_env.UpdateIssueApproval(78901, 24, delta, 'please review', False, |
| 2252 | attachments=attachments) |
| 2253 | |
| 2254 | self.services.issue.DeltaUpdateIssueApproval.assert_called_once_with( |
| 2255 | self.mr.cnxn, 111, config, issue, av_24, delta, |
| 2256 | comment_content='please review', is_description=False, |
| 2257 | attachments=attachments, kept_attachments=None) |
| 2258 | |
| 2259 | @mock.patch( |
| 2260 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendApprovalChangeNotification') |
| 2261 | @mock.patch( |
| 2262 | 'tracker.tracker_helpers.FilterKeptAttachments') |
| 2263 | def testUpdateIssueApproval_KeptAttachments( |
| 2264 | self, mockFilterKeptAttachments, _mockPrepareAndSend): |
| 2265 | """We can keep attachments from previous descriptions.""" |
| 2266 | self.services.issue.DeltaUpdateIssueApproval = mock.Mock() |
| 2267 | mockFilterKeptAttachments.return_value = [1, 2] |
| 2268 | |
| 2269 | self.SignIn() |
| 2270 | |
| 2271 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(789, [], []) |
| 2272 | self.services.config.StoreConfig('cnxn', config) |
| 2273 | |
| 2274 | av_24 = tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2275 | approval_id=24, approver_ids=[111], |
| 2276 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.NOT_SET, set_on=1234, setter_id=999) |
| 2277 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111, |
| 2278 | issue_id=78901, approval_values=[av_24]) |
| 2279 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2280 | |
| 2281 | delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta(setter_id=111) |
| 2282 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2283 | we.UpdateIssueApproval( |
| 2284 | 78901, 24, delta, 'Another Desc', True, kept_attachments=[1, 2, 3]) |
| 2285 | |
| 2286 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 2287 | mockFilterKeptAttachments.assert_called_once_with( |
| 2288 | True, [1, 2, 3], comments, 24) |
| 2289 | self.services.issue.DeltaUpdateIssueApproval.assert_called_once_with( |
| 2290 | self.mr.cnxn, 111, config, issue, av_24, delta, |
| 2291 | comment_content='Another Desc', is_description=True, |
| 2292 | attachments=None, kept_attachments=[1, 2]) |
| 2293 | |
| 2294 | def testUpdateIssueApproval_TooLongComment(self): |
| 2295 | """We raise an exception if too long a comment is used when updating an |
| 2296 | issue's approval value.""" |
| 2297 | self.services.issue.DeltaUpdateIssueApproval = mock.Mock() |
| 2298 | |
| 2299 | self.SignIn() |
| 2300 | |
| 2301 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(789, [], []) |
| 2302 | self.services.config.StoreConfig('cnxn', config) |
| 2303 | |
| 2304 | av_24 = tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2305 | approval_id=24, |
| 2306 | approver_ids=[111], |
| 2307 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.NOT_SET, |
| 2308 | set_on=1234, |
| 2309 | setter_id=999) |
| 2310 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 2311 | 789, |
| 2312 | 1, |
| 2313 | 'summary', |
| 2314 | 'Available', |
| 2315 | 111, |
| 2316 | issue_id=78901, |
| 2317 | approval_values=[av_24]) |
| 2318 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2319 | |
| 2320 | delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta( |
| 2321 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.REVIEW_REQUESTED, |
| 2322 | set_on=2345, |
| 2323 | approver_ids_add=[222]) |
| 2324 | |
| 2325 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 2326 | long_comment = ' ' + 'c' * tracker_constants.MAX_COMMENT_CHARS + ' ' |
| 2327 | self.work_env.UpdateIssueApproval(78901, 24, delta, long_comment, False) |
| 2328 | |
| 2329 | def testUpdateIssueApproval_NonExistentUsers(self): |
| 2330 | """We raise an exception if adding an approver that does not exist.""" |
| 2331 | self.services.issue.DeltaUpdateIssueApproval = mock.Mock() |
| 2332 | |
| 2333 | self.SignIn() |
| 2334 | |
| 2335 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(789, [], []) |
| 2336 | self.services.config.StoreConfig('cnxn', config) |
| 2337 | |
| 2338 | av_24 = tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2339 | approval_id=24, |
| 2340 | approver_ids=[111], |
| 2341 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.NOT_SET, |
| 2342 | set_on=1234, |
| 2343 | setter_id=999) |
| 2344 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 2345 | 789, |
| 2346 | 1, |
| 2347 | 'summary', |
| 2348 | 'Available', |
| 2349 | 111, |
| 2350 | issue_id=78901, |
| 2351 | approval_values=[av_24]) |
| 2352 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2353 | |
| 2354 | delta = tracker_pb2.ApprovalDelta( |
| 2355 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.REVIEW_REQUESTED, |
| 2356 | set_on=2345, |
| 2357 | approver_ids_add=[9876]) |
| 2358 | |
| 2359 | with self.assertRaisesRegexp(exceptions.InputException, |
| 2360 | 'users/9876: User does not exist.'): |
| 2361 | comment = 'stuff' |
| 2362 | self.work_env.UpdateIssueApproval(78901, 24, delta, comment, False) |
| 2363 | |
| 2364 | @mock.patch( |
| 2365 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2366 | def testConvertIssueApprovalsTemplate(self, fake_pasicn): |
| 2367 | """We can convert an issue's approvals to match template's approvals.""" |
| 2368 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111) |
| 2369 | issue.approval_values = [ |
| 2370 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2371 | approval_id=3, |
| 2372 | phase_id=4, |
| 2373 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.APPROVED, |
| 2374 | approver_ids=[111], |
| 2375 | ), |
| 2376 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2377 | approval_id=4, |
| 2378 | phase_id=5, |
| 2379 | approver_ids=[111]), |
| 2380 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue(approval_id=6)] |
| 2381 | issue.phases = [ |
| 2382 | tracker_pb2.Phase(name='Expired', phase_id=4), |
| 2383 | tracker_pb2.Phase(name='canary', phase_id=3)] |
| 2384 | issue.field_values = [ |
| 2385 | tracker_bizobj.MakeFieldValue(8, None, 'Pink', None, None, None, False), |
| 2386 | tracker_bizobj.MakeFieldValue( |
| 2387 | 9, None, 'Silver', None, None, None, False, phase_id=3), |
| 2388 | tracker_bizobj.MakeFieldValue( |
| 2389 | 19, None, 'Orange', None, None, None, False, phase_id=4), |
| 2390 | ] |
| 2391 | |
| 2392 | self.services.issue._UpdateIssuesApprovals = mock.Mock() |
| 2393 | self.SignIn() |
| 2394 | |
| 2395 | template = testing_helpers.DefaultTemplates()[0] |
| 2396 | template.approval_values = [ |
| 2397 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2398 | approval_id=3, |
| 2399 | phase_id=6, # Different phase. Nothing else affected. |
| 2400 | approver_ids=[222]), |
| 2401 | # No phase. Nothing else affected. |
| 2402 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue(approval_id=4), |
| 2403 | # New approval not already found in issue. |
| 2404 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2405 | approval_id=7, |
| 2406 | phase_id=5, |
| 2407 | approver_ids=[222]), |
| 2408 | ] # No approval 6 |
| 2409 | template.phases = [tracker_pb2.Phase(name='Canary', phase_id=5), |
| 2410 | tracker_pb2.Phase(name='Stable-Exp', phase_id=6)] |
| 2411 | self.services.template.GetTemplateByName.return_value = template |
| 2412 | |
| 2413 | config = self.services.config.GetProjectConfig(self.cnxn, 789) |
| 2414 | config.approval_defs = [ |
| 2415 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalDef(approval_id=3, survey='Question3'), |
| 2416 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalDef(approval_id=4, survey='Question4'), |
| 2417 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalDef(approval_id=7, survey='Question7'), |
| 2418 | ] |
| 2419 | config.field_defs = [ |
| 2420 | tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2421 | field_id=3, project_id=789, field_name='Cow'), |
| 2422 | tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2423 | field_id=4, project_id=789, field_name='Chicken'), |
| 2424 | tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2425 | field_id=6, project_id=789, field_name='Llama'), |
| 2426 | tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2427 | field_id=7, project_id=789, field_name='Roo'), |
| 2428 | tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2429 | field_id=8, project_id=789, field_name='Salmon'), |
| 2430 | tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2431 | field_id=9, project_id=789, field_name='Tuna', is_phase_field=True), |
| 2432 | tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2433 | field_id=10, project_id=789, field_name='Clown', is_phase_field=True), |
| 2434 | ] |
| 2435 | self.work_env.ConvertIssueApprovalsTemplate( |
| 2436 | config, issue, 'template_name', 'Convert', send_email=False) |
| 2437 | |
| 2438 | expected_avs = [ |
| 2439 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2440 | approval_id=3, |
| 2441 | phase_id=6, |
| 2442 | status=tracker_pb2.ApprovalStatus.APPROVED, |
| 2443 | approver_ids=[111], |
| 2444 | ), |
| 2445 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2446 | approval_id=4, |
| 2447 | approver_ids=[111]), |
| 2448 | tracker_pb2.ApprovalValue( |
| 2449 | approval_id=7, |
| 2450 | phase_id=5, |
| 2451 | approver_ids=[222]), |
| 2452 | ] |
| 2453 | expected_fvs = [ |
| 2454 | tracker_bizobj.MakeFieldValue(8, None, 'Pink', None, None, None, False), |
| 2455 | tracker_bizobj.MakeFieldValue( |
| 2456 | 9, None, 'Silver', None, None, None, False, phase_id=5), |
| 2457 | ] |
| 2458 | self.assertEqual(issue.approval_values, expected_avs) |
| 2459 | self.assertEqual(issue.field_values, expected_fvs) |
| 2460 | self.assertEqual(issue.phases, template.phases) |
| 2461 | self.services.template.GetTemplateByName.assert_called_once_with( |
| 2462 | self.mr.cnxn, 'template_name', 789) |
| 2463 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 2464 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', 111, send_email=False, |
| 2465 | comment_id=mock.ANY) |
| 2466 | |
| 2467 | def testConvertIssueApprovalsTemplate_NoSuchTemplate(self): |
| 2468 | self.SignIn() |
| 2469 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111) |
| 2470 | self.services.template.GetTemplateByName.return_value = None |
| 2471 | config = self.services.config.GetProjectConfig(self.cnxn, 789) |
| 2472 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchTemplateException): |
| 2473 | self.work_env.ConvertIssueApprovalsTemplate( |
| 2474 | config, issue, 'template_name', 'comment') |
| 2475 | |
| 2476 | def testConvertIssueApprovalsTemplate_TooLongComment(self): |
| 2477 | self.SignIn() |
| 2478 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111) |
| 2479 | config = self.services.config.GetProjectConfig(self.cnxn, 789) |
| 2480 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 2481 | long_comment = ' ' + 'c' * tracker_constants.MAX_COMMENT_CHARS + ' ' |
| 2482 | self.work_env.ConvertIssueApprovalsTemplate( |
| 2483 | config, issue, 'template_name', long_comment) |
| 2484 | |
| 2485 | def testConvertIssueApprovalsTemplate_MissingEditPermissions(self): |
| 2486 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 2487 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', self.user_1.user_id) |
| 2488 | config = self.services.config.GetProjectConfig(self.cnxn, 789) |
| 2489 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 2490 | self.work_env.ConvertIssueApprovalsTemplate( |
| 2491 | config, issue, 'template_name', 'comment') |
| 2492 | |
| 2493 | @mock.patch( |
| 2494 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2495 | @mock.patch( |
| 2496 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2497 | def testUpdateIssue_Normal(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2498 | """We can update an issue.""" |
| 2499 | self.SignIn() |
| 2500 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 0) |
| 2501 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2502 | |
| 2503 | fd = tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2504 | field_name='CustomField', |
| 2505 | field_id=1, |
| 2506 | field_type=tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.STR_TYPE) |
| 2507 | res_fd = tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2508 | field_name='ResField', |
| 2509 | field_id=2, |
| 2510 | field_type=tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.STR_TYPE, |
| 2511 | is_restricted_field=True, |
| 2512 | admin_ids=[111]) |
| 2513 | res_fd2 = tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2514 | field_name='ResEnumField', |
| 2515 | field_id=3, |
| 2516 | field_type=tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.ENUM_TYPE, |
| 2517 | is_restricted_field=True, |
| 2518 | editor_ids=[111]) |
| 2519 | config = self.services.config.GetProjectConfig(self.cnxn, 789) |
| 2520 | config.field_defs = [fd, res_fd, res_fd2] |
| 2521 | self.services.config.StoreConfig(None, config) |
| 2522 | |
| 2523 | fv = tracker_pb2.FieldValue(field_id=1, str_value='Chicken') |
| 2524 | res_fv = tracker_pb2.FieldValue(field_id=2, str_value='Dog') |
| 2525 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 2526 | owner_id=111, |
| 2527 | summary='New summary', |
| 2528 | cc_ids_add=[333], |
| 2529 | field_vals_add=[fv, res_fv], |
| 2530 | labels_add=['resenumfield-b']) |
| 2531 | |
| 2532 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2533 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'Getting started') |
| 2534 | |
| 2535 | self.assertEqual(111, issue.owner_id) |
| 2536 | self.assertEqual('New summary', issue.summary) |
| 2537 | self.assertEqual([333], issue.cc_ids) |
| 2538 | self.assertEqual([fv, res_fv], issue.field_values) |
| 2539 | self.assertEqual(['resenumfield-b'], issue.labels) |
| 2540 | self.assertEqual([issue.issue_id], self.services.issue.enqueued_issues) |
| 2541 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 2542 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 2543 | self.assertFalse(comment_pb.is_description) |
| 2544 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 2545 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', 111, send_email=True, |
| 2546 | old_owner_id=0, comment_id=comment_pb.id) |
| 2547 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_with( |
| 2548 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', [], 111, send_email=True) |
| 2549 | |
| 2550 | def testUpdateIssue_RejectEditRestrictedField(self): |
| 2551 | """We can update an issue.""" |
| 2552 | self.SignIn() |
| 2553 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 0) |
| 2554 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2555 | |
| 2556 | fd = tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2557 | field_name='CustomField', |
| 2558 | field_id=1, |
| 2559 | field_type=tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.STR_TYPE) |
| 2560 | res_fd = tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2561 | field_name='ResField', |
| 2562 | field_id=2, |
| 2563 | field_type=tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.STR_TYPE, |
| 2564 | is_restricted_field=True) |
| 2565 | res_fd2 = tracker_pb2.FieldDef( |
| 2566 | field_name='ResEnumField', |
| 2567 | field_id=3, |
| 2568 | field_type=tracker_pb2.FieldTypes.ENUM_TYPE, |
| 2569 | is_restricted_field=True) |
| 2570 | config = self.services.config.GetProjectConfig(self.cnxn, 789) |
| 2571 | config.field_defs = [fd, res_fd, res_fd2] |
| 2572 | self.services.config.StoreConfig(None, config) |
| 2573 | |
| 2574 | fv = tracker_pb2.FieldValue(field_id=1, str_value='Chicken') |
| 2575 | res_fv = tracker_pb2.FieldValue(field_id=2, str_value='Dog') |
| 2576 | delta_res_field_val = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 2577 | owner_id=111, |
| 2578 | summary='New summary', |
| 2579 | cc_ids_add=[333], |
| 2580 | field_vals_add=[fv, res_fv]) |
| 2581 | delta_res_enum = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 2582 | owner_id=111, |
| 2583 | summary='New summary', |
| 2584 | cc_ids_add=[333], |
| 2585 | field_vals_add=[fv], |
| 2586 | labels_add=['resenumfield-b']) |
| 2587 | |
| 2588 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 2589 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2590 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta_res_field_val, 'Getting Started') |
| 2591 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 2592 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2593 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta_res_enum, 'Getting Started') |
| 2594 | |
| 2595 | @mock.patch( |
| 2596 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2597 | @mock.patch( |
| 2598 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2599 | def testUpdateIssue_EditDescription(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2600 | """We can edit an issue description.""" |
| 2601 | self.SignIn() |
| 2602 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2603 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2604 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 2605 | |
| 2606 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2607 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'New description', is_description=True) |
| 2608 | |
| 2609 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 2610 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 2611 | self.assertTrue(comment_pb.is_description) |
| 2612 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 2613 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', 111, send_email=True, |
| 2614 | old_owner_id=111, comment_id=comment_pb.id) |
| 2615 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_with( |
| 2616 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', [], 111, send_email=True) |
| 2617 | |
| 2618 | @mock.patch( |
| 2619 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2620 | @mock.patch( |
| 2621 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2622 | def testUpdateIssue_NotAllowedToEditDescription( |
| 2623 | self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2624 | """We cannot edit an issue description without EditIssue permission.""" |
| 2625 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 2626 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2627 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2628 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 2629 | |
| 2630 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 2631 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2632 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'New description', is_description=True) |
| 2633 | |
| 2634 | fake_pasicn.assert_not_called() |
| 2635 | fake_pasibn.assert_not_called() |
| 2636 | |
| 2637 | @mock.patch( |
| 2638 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2639 | @mock.patch( |
| 2640 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2641 | def testUpdateIssue_EditTooLongComment(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2642 | """We cannot edit an issue description with too long a comment.""" |
| 2643 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 2644 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2645 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2646 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 2647 | |
| 2648 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 2649 | long_comment = ' ' + 'c' * tracker_constants.MAX_COMMENT_CHARS + ' ' |
| 2650 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2651 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, long_comment) |
| 2652 | |
| 2653 | fake_pasicn.assert_not_called() |
| 2654 | fake_pasibn.assert_not_called() |
| 2655 | |
| 2656 | @mock.patch( |
| 2657 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2658 | @mock.patch( |
| 2659 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2660 | def testUpdateIssue_AddTooLongComment(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2661 | """We cannot add too long a comment.""" |
| 2662 | self.SignIn() |
| 2663 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2664 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2665 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 2666 | |
| 2667 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 2668 | long_comment = ' ' + 'c' * tracker_constants.MAX_COMMENT_CHARS + ' ' |
| 2669 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2670 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, long_comment) |
| 2671 | |
| 2672 | fake_pasicn.assert_not_called() |
| 2673 | fake_pasibn.assert_not_called() |
| 2674 | |
| 2675 | @mock.patch( |
| 2676 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2677 | @mock.patch( |
| 2678 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2679 | def testUpdateIssue_AddComment(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2680 | """We can add a comment.""" |
| 2681 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 2682 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2683 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2684 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 2685 | |
| 2686 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2687 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'New description') |
| 2688 | |
| 2689 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 2690 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 2691 | self.assertFalse(comment_pb.is_description) |
| 2692 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 2693 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', 222, send_email=True, |
| 2694 | old_owner_id=111, comment_id=comment_pb.id) |
| 2695 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_with( |
| 2696 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', [], 222, send_email=True) |
| 2697 | |
| 2698 | @mock.patch( |
| 2699 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2700 | @mock.patch( |
| 2701 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2702 | def testUpdateIssue_AddComment_NoEmail(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2703 | """We can add a comment without sending email.""" |
| 2704 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 2705 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2706 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2707 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 2708 | |
| 2709 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2710 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'New description', send_email=False) |
| 2711 | |
| 2712 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 2713 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 2714 | self.assertFalse(comment_pb.is_description) |
| 2715 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 2716 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', 222, send_email=False, |
| 2717 | old_owner_id=111, comment_id=comment_pb.id) |
| 2718 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_with( |
| 2719 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', [], 222, send_email=False) |
| 2720 | |
| 2721 | @mock.patch( |
| 2722 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2723 | @mock.patch( |
| 2724 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2725 | @mock.patch('framework.permissions.GetExtraPerms') |
| 2726 | def testUpdateIssue_EditOwner( |
| 2727 | self, fake_extra_perms, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2728 | """We can edit the owner with the EditIssueOwner permission.""" |
| 2729 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 2730 | fake_extra_perms.return_value = [permissions.EDIT_ISSUE_OWNER] |
| 2731 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2732 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2733 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(owner_id=0) |
| 2734 | |
| 2735 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2736 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2737 | |
| 2738 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 2739 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 2740 | self.assertFalse(comment_pb.is_description) |
| 2741 | self.assertEqual(0, issue.owner_id) |
| 2742 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 2743 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', 222, send_email=True, |
| 2744 | old_owner_id=111, comment_id=comment_pb.id) |
| 2745 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_with( |
| 2746 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', [], 222, send_email=True) |
| 2747 | |
| 2748 | @mock.patch( |
| 2749 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2750 | @mock.patch( |
| 2751 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2752 | @mock.patch('framework.permissions.GetExtraPerms') |
| 2753 | def testUpdateIssue_EditSummary( |
| 2754 | self, fake_extra_perms, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2755 | """We can edit the owner with the EditIssueOwner permission.""" |
| 2756 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 2757 | fake_extra_perms.return_value = [permissions.EDIT_ISSUE_SUMMARY] |
| 2758 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2759 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2760 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(summary='New Summary') |
| 2761 | |
| 2762 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2763 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2764 | |
| 2765 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 2766 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 2767 | self.assertFalse(comment_pb.is_description) |
| 2768 | self.assertEqual('New Summary', issue.summary) |
| 2769 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 2770 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', 222, send_email=True, |
| 2771 | old_owner_id=111, comment_id=comment_pb.id) |
| 2772 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_with( |
| 2773 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', [], 222, send_email=True) |
| 2774 | |
| 2775 | @mock.patch( |
| 2776 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2777 | @mock.patch( |
| 2778 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2779 | @mock.patch('framework.permissions.GetExtraPerms') |
| 2780 | def testUpdateIssue_EditStatus( |
| 2781 | self, fake_extra_perms, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2782 | """We can edit the owner with the EditIssueOwner permission.""" |
| 2783 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 2784 | fake_extra_perms.return_value = [permissions.EDIT_ISSUE_STATUS] |
| 2785 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2786 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2787 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(status='Fixed') |
| 2788 | |
| 2789 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2790 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2791 | |
| 2792 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 2793 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 2794 | self.assertFalse(comment_pb.is_description) |
| 2795 | self.assertEqual('Fixed', issue.status) |
| 2796 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 2797 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', 222, send_email=True, |
| 2798 | old_owner_id=111, comment_id=comment_pb.id) |
| 2799 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_with( |
| 2800 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', [], 222, send_email=True) |
| 2801 | |
| 2802 | @mock.patch( |
| 2803 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2804 | @mock.patch('framework.permissions.GetExtraPerms') |
| 2805 | def testUpdateIssue_EditCC(self, fake_extra_perms, _fake_pasicn): |
| 2806 | """We can edit the owner with the EditIssueOwner permission.""" |
| 2807 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 2808 | fake_extra_perms.return_value = [permissions.EDIT_ISSUE_CC] |
| 2809 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2810 | issue.cc_ids = [111] |
| 2811 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2812 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(cc_ids_add=[222]) |
| 2813 | |
| 2814 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2815 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2816 | |
| 2817 | self.assertEqual([111, 222], issue.cc_ids) |
| 2818 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(cc_ids_remove=[111]) |
| 2819 | |
| 2820 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2821 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2822 | |
| 2823 | self.assertEqual([222], issue.cc_ids) |
| 2824 | |
| 2825 | def testUpdateIssue_BadOwner(self): |
| 2826 | """We reject new issue owners that don't pass validation.""" |
| 2827 | self.SignIn() |
| 2828 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2829 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2830 | |
| 2831 | # No such user ID. |
| 2832 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(owner_id=555) |
| 2833 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2834 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException) as cm: |
| 2835 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2836 | self.assertEqual('Issue owner user ID not found.', |
| 2837 | cm.exception.message) |
| 2838 | |
| 2839 | # Not a member |
| 2840 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(owner_id=222) |
| 2841 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2842 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException) as cm: |
| 2843 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2844 | self.assertEqual('Issue owner must be a project member.', |
| 2845 | cm.exception.message) |
| 2846 | |
| 2847 | @mock.patch( |
| 2848 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2849 | @mock.patch( |
| 2850 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2851 | def testUpdateIssue_MergeInto(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2852 | """We can merge Issue 1 (merged_issue) into Issue 2 (merged_into_issue), |
| 2853 | including CCs and starrers.""" |
| 2854 | self.SignIn() |
| 2855 | merged_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2856 | merged_into_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'summary2', 'Available', 111) |
| 2857 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(merged_issue) |
| 2858 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(merged_into_issue) |
| 2859 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 2860 | merged_into=merged_into_issue.issue_id, status='Duplicate') |
| 2861 | |
| 2862 | merged_issue.cc_ids = [111, 222, 333, 444] |
| 2863 | self.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch( |
| 2864 | 'cnxn', 'service', 'config', merged_issue.issue_id, [111, 222, 333], |
| 2865 | True) |
| 2866 | self.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch( |
| 2867 | 'cnxn', 'service', 'config', merged_into_issue.issue_id, [555], True) |
| 2868 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2869 | we.UpdateIssue(merged_issue, delta, '') |
| 2870 | |
| 2871 | merged_into_issue_comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue( |
| 2872 | 'cnxn', merged_into_issue.issue_id) |
| 2873 | |
| 2874 | # Original issue marked as duplicate. |
| 2875 | self.assertEqual('Duplicate', merged_issue.status) |
| 2876 | # Target issue has original issue's CCs. |
| 2877 | self.assertEqual([444, 333, 222, 111], merged_into_issue.cc_ids) |
| 2878 | # A comment was added to the target issue. |
| 2879 | merged_into_issue_comment = merged_into_issue_comments[-1] |
| 2880 | self.assertEqual( |
| 2881 | 'Issue 1 has been merged into this issue.', |
| 2882 | merged_into_issue_comment.content) |
| 2883 | source_starrers = self.services.issue_star.LookupItemStarrers( |
| 2884 | 'cnxn', merged_issue.issue_id) |
| 2885 | self.assertItemsEqual([111, 222, 333], source_starrers) |
| 2886 | target_starrers = self.services.issue_star.LookupItemStarrers( |
| 2887 | 'cnxn', merged_into_issue.issue_id) |
| 2888 | self.assertItemsEqual([111, 222, 333, 555], target_starrers) |
| 2889 | # Notifications should be sent for both |
| 2890 | # the merged issue and the merged_into issue. |
| 2891 | merged_issue_comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue( |
| 2892 | 'cnxn', merged_issue.issue_id) |
| 2893 | merged_issue_comment = merged_issue_comments[-1] |
| 2894 | hostport = 'testing-app.appspot.com' |
| 2895 | execute_calls = [ |
| 2896 | mock.call( |
| 2897 | merged_into_issue.issue_id, |
| 2898 | hostport, |
| 2899 | 111, |
| 2900 | send_email=True, |
| 2901 | comment_id=merged_into_issue_comment.id), |
| 2902 | mock.call( |
| 2903 | merged_issue.issue_id, |
| 2904 | hostport, |
| 2905 | 111, |
| 2906 | send_email=True, |
| 2907 | old_owner_id=111, |
| 2908 | comment_id=merged_issue_comment.id) |
| 2909 | ] |
| 2910 | fake_pasicn.assert_has_calls(execute_calls) |
| 2911 | self.assertEqual(2, fake_pasicn.call_count) |
| 2912 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_once_with( |
| 2913 | merged_issue.issue_id, hostport, [], 111, send_email=True) |
| 2914 | |
| 2915 | def testUpdateIssue_MergeIntoRestrictedIssue(self): |
| 2916 | """We cannot merge into an issue we cannot view and edit.""" |
| 2917 | self.SignIn(333) |
| 2918 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2919 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'summary2', 'Available', 111) |
| 2920 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2921 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 2922 | |
| 2923 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 2924 | merged_into=issue2.issue_id, |
| 2925 | status='Duplicate') |
| 2926 | |
| 2927 | issue2.labels = ['Restrict-View-Foo'] |
| 2928 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2929 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 2930 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2931 | |
| 2932 | issue2.labels = ['Restrict-EditIssue-Foo'] |
| 2933 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2934 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 2935 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2936 | |
| 2937 | # Original issue still available. |
| 2938 | self.assertEqual('Available', issue.status) |
| 2939 | # Target issue was not modified. |
| 2940 | self.assertEqual([], issue2.cc_ids) |
| 2941 | # No comment was added. |
| 2942 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue2.issue_id) |
| 2943 | self.assertEqual(1, len(comments)) |
| 2944 | |
| 2945 | def testUpdateIssue_MergeIntoItself(self): |
| 2946 | """We cannot merge an issue into itself.""" |
| 2947 | self.SignIn() |
| 2948 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2949 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2950 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 2951 | merged_into=issue.issue_id, |
| 2952 | status='Duplicate') |
| 2953 | |
| 2954 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2955 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException) as cm: |
| 2956 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2957 | self.assertEqual('Cannot merge an issue into itself.', cm.exception.message) |
| 2958 | |
| 2959 | # Original issue still available. |
| 2960 | self.assertEqual('Available', issue.status) |
| 2961 | # No comment was added. |
| 2962 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 2963 | self.assertEqual(1, len(comments)) |
| 2964 | |
| 2965 | @mock.patch( |
| 2966 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2967 | @mock.patch( |
| 2968 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2969 | def testUpdateIssue_BlockOn(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2970 | """We can block an issue on an existing issue.""" |
| 2971 | self.SignIn() |
| 2972 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2973 | upstream_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'umbrella', 'Available', 111) |
| 2974 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2975 | |
| 2976 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(blocked_on_add=[upstream_issue.issue_id]) |
| 2977 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 2978 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 2979 | |
| 2980 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 2981 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 2982 | self.assertEqual([upstream_issue.issue_id], issue.blocked_on_iids) |
| 2983 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 2984 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', 111, send_email=True, |
| 2985 | old_owner_id=111, comment_id=comment_pb.id) |
| 2986 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_with( |
| 2987 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', [upstream_issue.issue_id], |
| 2988 | 111, send_email=True) |
| 2989 | |
| 2990 | @mock.patch( |
| 2991 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 2992 | @mock.patch( |
| 2993 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 2994 | def testUpdateIssue_BlockOnItself(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 2995 | """We cannot block an issue on itself.""" |
| 2996 | self.SignIn() |
| 2997 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 2998 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 2999 | |
| 3000 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(blocked_on_add=[issue.issue_id]) |
| 3001 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3002 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException) as cm: |
| 3003 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 3004 | self.assertEqual('Cannot block an issue on itself.', cm.exception.message) |
| 3005 | |
| 3006 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(blocking_add=[issue.issue_id]) |
| 3007 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3008 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException) as cm: |
| 3009 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, '') |
| 3010 | self.assertEqual('Cannot block an issue on itself.', cm.exception.message) |
| 3011 | |
| 3012 | # Original issue was not modified. |
| 3013 | self.assertEqual(0, len(issue.blocked_on_iids)) |
| 3014 | self.assertEqual(0, len(issue.blocking_iids)) |
| 3015 | # No comment was added. |
| 3016 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 3017 | self.assertEqual(1, len(comments)) |
| 3018 | fake_pasicn.assert_not_called() |
| 3019 | fake_pasibn.assert_not_called() |
| 3020 | |
| 3021 | @mock.patch( |
| 3022 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 3023 | @mock.patch( |
| 3024 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3025 | def testUpdateIssue_Attachments(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 3026 | """We can attach files as we make a change.""" |
| 3027 | self.SignIn() |
| 3028 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 0) |
| 3029 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 3030 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 3031 | owner_id=111, summary='New summary', cc_ids_add=[333]) |
| 3032 | |
| 3033 | attachments = [] |
| 3034 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3035 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'Getting started', attachments=attachments) |
| 3036 | |
| 3037 | self.assertEqual(111, issue.owner_id) |
| 3038 | self.assertEqual('New summary', issue.summary) |
| 3039 | self.assertEqual([333], issue.cc_ids) |
| 3040 | self.assertEqual([issue.issue_id], self.services.issue.enqueued_issues) |
| 3041 | |
| 3042 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 3043 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 3044 | self.assertEqual([], comment_pb.attachments) |
| 3045 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 3046 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', 111, send_email=True, |
| 3047 | old_owner_id=0, comment_id=comment_pb.id) |
| 3048 | fake_pasibn.assert_called_with( |
| 3049 | issue.issue_id, 'testing-app.appspot.com', [], 111, send_email=True) |
| 3050 | |
| 3051 | attachments = [ |
| 3052 | ('README.md', 'readme content', 'text/plain'), |
| 3053 | ('hello.txt', 'hello content', 'text/plain')] |
| 3054 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3055 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'Getting started', attachments=attachments) |
| 3056 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 3057 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 3058 | self.assertEqual(2, len(comment_pb.attachments)) |
| 3059 | |
| 3060 | @mock.patch( |
| 3061 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3062 | def testUpdateIssue_KeptAttachments(self, _fake_pasicn): |
| 3063 | """We can attach files as we make a change.""" |
| 3064 | self.SignIn() |
| 3065 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 111) |
| 3066 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 3067 | |
| 3068 | # Add some initial attachments |
| 3069 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 3070 | attachments = [ |
| 3071 | ('README.md', 'readme content', 'text/plain'), |
| 3072 | ('hello.txt', 'hello content', 'text/plain')] |
| 3073 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3074 | we.UpdateIssue( |
| 3075 | issue, delta, 'New Description', attachments=attachments, |
| 3076 | is_description=True) |
| 3077 | |
| 3078 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3079 | we.UpdateIssue( |
| 3080 | issue, delta, 'Yet Another Description', is_description=True, |
| 3081 | kept_attachments=[1, 2, 3]) |
| 3082 | |
| 3083 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 3084 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 3085 | self.assertEqual(1, len(comment_pb.attachments)) |
| 3086 | self.assertEqual('hello.txt', comment_pb.attachments[0].filename) |
| 3087 | |
| 3088 | @mock.patch( |
| 3089 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueBlockingNotification') |
| 3090 | @mock.patch( |
| 3091 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3092 | def testUpdateIssue_PermissionDenied(self, fake_pasicn, fake_pasibn): |
| 3093 | """We reject attempts to update an issue when the user lacks permission.""" |
| 3094 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 555) |
| 3095 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 3096 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 3097 | owner_id=222, summary='New summary', cc_ids_add=[333]) |
| 3098 | |
| 3099 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3100 | # User is not signed in. |
| 3101 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 3102 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'I am anon') |
| 3103 | |
| 3104 | # User signed in to acconut that can view but not edit. |
| 3105 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 3106 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 3107 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'I am not a project member') |
| 3108 | |
| 3109 | # User signed in to acconut that can view and edit, but issue |
| 3110 | # restricts edits to a perm that the user lacks. |
| 3111 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 3112 | issue.labels.append('Restrict-EditIssue-CoreTeam') |
| 3113 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 3114 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'I lack CoreTeam') |
| 3115 | |
| 3116 | fake_pasicn.assert_not_called() |
| 3117 | fake_pasibn.assert_not_called() |
| 3118 | |
| 3119 | @mock.patch( |
| 3120 | 'settings.preferred_domains', {'testing-app.appspot.com': 'example.com'}) |
| 3121 | @mock.patch( |
| 3122 | 'settings.branded_domains', {'proj': 'branded.com'}) |
| 3123 | @mock.patch( |
| 3124 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3125 | def testUpdateIssue_BrandedDomain(self, fake_pasicn): |
| 3126 | """Updating an issue in project with branded domain uses that domain.""" |
| 3127 | self.SignIn() |
| 3128 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'summary', 'Available', 0) |
| 3129 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 3130 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 3131 | owner_id=111, summary='New summary', cc_ids_add=[333]) |
| 3132 | |
| 3133 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3134 | we.UpdateIssue(issue, delta, 'Getting started') |
| 3135 | |
| 3136 | comments = self.services.issue.GetCommentsForIssue('cnxn', issue.issue_id) |
| 3137 | comment_pb = comments[-1] |
| 3138 | hostport = 'branded.com' |
| 3139 | fake_pasicn.assert_called_with( |
| 3140 | issue.issue_id, hostport, 111, send_email=True, |
| 3141 | old_owner_id=0, comment_id=comment_pb.id) |
| 3142 | |
| 3143 | @mock.patch( |
| 3144 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3145 | @mock.patch('features.send_notifications.SendIssueBulkChangeNotification') |
| 3146 | @mock.patch('time.time') |
| 3147 | def testModifyIssues_WeirdDeltas( |
| 3148 | self, fake_time, fake_bulk_notify, fake_notify): |
| 3149 | """Test that ModifyIssues does not panic with weird deltas.""" |
| 3150 | fake_time.return_value = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3151 | |
| 3152 | # Issues merge into each other. |
| 3153 | issue_merge_a = _Issue(789, 1) |
| 3154 | issue_merge_b = _Issue(789, 2) |
| 3155 | |
| 3156 | delta_merge_a = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 3157 | merged_into=issue_merge_b.issue_id, status='Duplicate') |
| 3158 | delta_merge_b = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 3159 | merged_into=issue_merge_a.issue_id, status='Duplicate') |
| 3160 | |
| 3161 | exp_merge_a = copy.deepcopy(issue_merge_a) |
| 3162 | exp_merge_a.merged_into = issue_merge_b.issue_id |
| 3163 | exp_merge_a.status = 'Duplicate' |
| 3164 | exp_merge_a.status_modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3165 | exp_amendments_merge_a = [ |
| 3166 | tracker_bizobj.MakeStatusAmendment('Duplicate', ''), |
| 3167 | tracker_bizobj.MakeMergedIntoAmendment( |
| 3168 | [(issue_merge_b.project_name, issue_merge_b.local_id)], [], |
| 3169 | default_project_name=issue_merge_a.project_name) |
| 3170 | ] |
| 3171 | |
| 3172 | exp_merge_a_imp_content = work_env.MERGE_COMMENT % issue_merge_b.local_id |
| 3173 | exp_merge_b = copy.deepcopy(issue_merge_b) |
| 3174 | exp_merge_b.merged_into = exp_merge_a.issue_id |
| 3175 | exp_merge_b.status = 'Duplicate' |
| 3176 | exp_merge_b.status_modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3177 | exp_amendments_merge_b = [ |
| 3178 | tracker_bizobj.MakeStatusAmendment('Duplicate', ''), |
| 3179 | tracker_bizobj.MakeMergedIntoAmendment( |
| 3180 | [(issue_merge_a.project_name, issue_merge_a.local_id)], [], |
| 3181 | default_project_name=issue_merge_b.project_name) |
| 3182 | ] |
| 3183 | |
| 3184 | exp_merge_b_imp_content = work_env.MERGE_COMMENT % issue_merge_a.local_id |
| 3185 | |
| 3186 | # Issues that block each other. |
| 3187 | issue_block_a = _Issue(789, 5) |
| 3188 | issue_block_b = _Issue(789, 6) |
| 3189 | |
| 3190 | delta_block_a = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 3191 | blocking_add=[issue_block_b.issue_id]) |
| 3192 | delta_block_b = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 3193 | blocking_add=[issue_block_a.issue_id]) |
| 3194 | |
| 3195 | exp_block_a = copy.deepcopy(issue_block_a) |
| 3196 | exp_block_a.blocking_iids = [issue_block_b.issue_id] |
| 3197 | exp_block_a.blocked_on_iids = [issue_block_b.issue_id] |
| 3198 | exp_amendments_block_a = [tracker_bizobj.MakeBlockingAmendment( |
| 3199 | [(issue_block_b.project_name, issue_block_b.local_id)], [], |
| 3200 | default_project_name=issue_block_a.project_name)] |
| 3201 | exp_amendments_block_a_imp = [tracker_bizobj.MakeBlockedOnAmendment( |
| 3202 | [(issue_block_b.project_name, issue_block_b.local_id)], [], |
| 3203 | default_project_name=issue_block_a.project_name)] |
| 3204 | |
| 3205 | exp_block_b = copy.deepcopy(issue_block_b) |
| 3206 | exp_block_b.blocking_iids = [issue_block_a.issue_id] |
| 3207 | exp_block_b.blocked_on_iids = [issue_block_a.issue_id] |
| 3208 | exp_amendments_block_b = [tracker_bizobj.MakeBlockingAmendment( |
| 3209 | [(issue_block_a.project_name, issue_block_a.local_id)], [], |
| 3210 | default_project_name=issue_block_b.project_name)] |
| 3211 | exp_amendments_block_b_imp = [tracker_bizobj.MakeBlockedOnAmendment( |
| 3212 | [(issue_block_a.project_name, issue_block_a.local_id)], [], |
| 3213 | default_project_name=issue_block_b.project_name)] |
| 3214 | |
| 3215 | # By default new blocked_on issues that appear in blocked_on_iids |
| 3216 | # with no prior rank associated with it are un-ranked and assigned rank 0. |
| 3217 | # See SortBlockedOn in issue_svc.py. |
| 3218 | exp_block_a.blocked_on_ranks = [0] |
| 3219 | exp_block_b.blocked_on_ranks = [0] |
| 3220 | |
| 3221 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_merge_a) |
| 3222 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_merge_b) |
| 3223 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_block_a) |
| 3224 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_block_b) |
| 3225 | |
| 3226 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 3227 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 3228 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing = mock.Mock() |
| 3229 | issue_delta_pairs = [(issue_merge_a.issue_id, delta_merge_a), |
| 3230 | (issue_merge_b.issue_id, delta_merge_b), |
| 3231 | (issue_block_a.issue_id, delta_block_a), |
| 3232 | (issue_block_b.issue_id, delta_block_b)] |
| 3233 | |
| 3234 | content = 'Je suis un ananas.' |
| 3235 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 3236 | send_email = False |
| 3237 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3238 | actual_issues = we.ModifyIssues( |
| 3239 | issue_delta_pairs, |
| 3240 | False, |
| 3241 | comment_content=content, |
| 3242 | send_email=send_email) |
| 3243 | |
| 3244 | # We expect all issues to have a description comment and the comment(s) |
| 3245 | # added from the ModifyIssues() changes. |
| 3246 | def CheckComment( |
| 3247 | issue_id, exp_amendments, exp_amendments_imp, imp_comment_content=''): |
| 3248 | (_desc, comment, comment_imp |
| 3249 | ) = self.services.issue.comments_by_iid[issue_id] |
| 3250 | self.assertEqual(comment.amendments, exp_amendments) |
| 3251 | self.assertEqual(comment.content, content) |
| 3252 | self.assertEqual(comment_imp.amendments, exp_amendments_imp) |
| 3253 | self.assertEqual(comment_imp.content, imp_comment_content) |
| 3254 | return comment, comment_imp |
| 3255 | |
| 3256 | # Merge changes result in a MERGEDINTO Amendment for an |
| 3257 | # Issue's mergedInto change (e.g. MergedInto: 1) |
| 3258 | # and comment content for the impacted issue's change (with no amendment). |
| 3259 | # (e.g. 'Issue 2 has been merged into the this issue.') |
| 3260 | comment_merge_a, comment_merge_a_imp = CheckComment( |
| 3261 | issue_merge_a.issue_id, |
| 3262 | exp_amendments_merge_a, [], |
| 3263 | imp_comment_content=exp_merge_a_imp_content) |
| 3264 | comment_merge_b, comment_merge_b_imp = CheckComment( |
| 3265 | issue_merge_b.issue_id, |
| 3266 | exp_amendments_merge_b, [], |
| 3267 | imp_comment_content=exp_merge_b_imp_content) |
| 3268 | |
| 3269 | comment_block_a, comment_block_a_imp = CheckComment( |
| 3270 | issue_block_a.issue_id, exp_amendments_block_a, |
| 3271 | exp_amendments_block_a_imp) |
| 3272 | comment_block_b, comment_block_b_imp = CheckComment( |
| 3273 | issue_block_b.issue_id, exp_amendments_block_b, |
| 3274 | exp_amendments_block_b_imp) |
| 3275 | |
| 3276 | exp_issues = [exp_merge_a, exp_merge_b, exp_block_a, exp_block_b] |
| 3277 | self.assertEqual(len(actual_issues), len(exp_issues)) |
| 3278 | for exp_issue in exp_issues: |
| 3279 | # All updated issues should have been fetched from DB, skipping cache. |
| 3280 | # So we expect assume_stale=False was applied to all issues during the |
| 3281 | # the fetch. |
| 3282 | exp_issue.assume_stale = False |
| 3283 | # These derived values get set to the following when an issue goes through |
| 3284 | # the ApplyFilterRules path. (see filter_helpers._ComputeDerivedFields) |
| 3285 | exp_issue.derived_status = '' |
| 3286 | exp_issue.derived_owner_id = 0 |
| 3287 | |
| 3288 | exp_issue.modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3289 | |
| 3290 | # Check we successfully updated the issue in our services layer. |
| 3291 | self.assertEqual(exp_issue, self.services.issue.GetIssue( |
| 3292 | self.cnxn, exp_issue.issue_id)) |
| 3293 | # Check the issue was successfully returned. |
| 3294 | self.assertTrue(exp_issue in actual_issues) |
| 3295 | |
| 3296 | # Check issues enqueued for indexing. |
| 3297 | reindex_iids = {issue.issue_id for issue in exp_issues} |
| 3298 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing.assert_called_once_with( |
| 3299 | self.mr.cnxn, reindex_iids, commit=False) |
| 3300 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit.assert_called_once() |
| 3301 | |
| 3302 | hostport = 'testing-app.appspot.com' |
| 3303 | expected_notify_calls = [ |
| 3304 | # Notifications for main changes. |
| 3305 | mock.call( |
| 3306 | issue_merge_a.issue_id, |
| 3307 | hostport, |
| 3308 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3309 | old_owner_id=None, |
| 3310 | comment_id=comment_merge_a.id, |
| 3311 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3312 | mock.call( |
| 3313 | issue_merge_b.issue_id, |
| 3314 | hostport, |
| 3315 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3316 | old_owner_id=None, |
| 3317 | comment_id=comment_merge_b.id, |
| 3318 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3319 | mock.call( |
| 3320 | issue_block_a.issue_id, |
| 3321 | hostport, |
| 3322 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3323 | old_owner_id=None, |
| 3324 | comment_id=comment_block_a.id, |
| 3325 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3326 | mock.call( |
| 3327 | issue_block_b.issue_id, |
| 3328 | hostport, |
| 3329 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3330 | old_owner_id=None, |
| 3331 | comment_id=comment_block_b.id, |
| 3332 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3333 | # Notifications for impacted changes. |
| 3334 | mock.call( |
| 3335 | issue_merge_a.issue_id, |
| 3336 | hostport, |
| 3337 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3338 | comment_id=comment_merge_a_imp.id, |
| 3339 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3340 | mock.call( |
| 3341 | issue_merge_b.issue_id, |
| 3342 | hostport, |
| 3343 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3344 | comment_id=comment_merge_b_imp.id, |
| 3345 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3346 | mock.call( |
| 3347 | issue_block_a.issue_id, |
| 3348 | hostport, |
| 3349 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3350 | comment_id=comment_block_a_imp.id, |
| 3351 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3352 | mock.call( |
| 3353 | issue_block_b.issue_id, |
| 3354 | hostport, |
| 3355 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3356 | comment_id=comment_block_b_imp.id, |
| 3357 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3358 | ] |
| 3359 | fake_notify.assert_has_calls(expected_notify_calls, any_order=True) |
| 3360 | fake_bulk_notify.assert_not_called() |
| 3361 | |
| 3362 | @mock.patch( |
| 3363 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3364 | @mock.patch('features.send_notifications.SendIssueBulkChangeNotification') |
| 3365 | @mock.patch('time.time') |
| 3366 | def testModifyIssues(self, fake_time, fake_bulk_notify, fake_notify): |
| 3367 | fake_time.return_value = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3368 | |
| 3369 | # A main issue with noop delta. |
| 3370 | issue_noop = _Issue(789, 1) |
| 3371 | issue_noop.labels = ['chicken'] |
| 3372 | delta_noop = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(labels_add=issue_noop.labels) |
| 3373 | |
| 3374 | exp_issue_noop = copy.deepcopy(issue_noop) |
| 3375 | exp_amendments_noop = [] |
| 3376 | |
| 3377 | # A main issue with an empty delta and impacts from |
| 3378 | # issue_shared_a and issue_shared_b. |
| 3379 | issue_empty = _Issue(789, 2) |
| 3380 | delta_empty = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 3381 | |
| 3382 | exp_issue_empty = copy.deepcopy(issue_empty) |
| 3383 | exp_amendments_empty = [] |
| 3384 | exp_amendments_empty_imp = [] |
| 3385 | |
| 3386 | # A main issue with a shared delta_shared. |
| 3387 | issue_shared_a = _Issue(789, 3) |
| 3388 | delta_shared = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 3389 | owner_id=self.user_1.user_id, blocked_on_add=[issue_empty.issue_id]) |
| 3390 | |
| 3391 | exp_issue_shared_a = copy.deepcopy(issue_shared_a) |
| 3392 | exp_issue_shared_a.owner_modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3393 | exp_issue_shared_a.owner_id = self.user_1.user_id |
| 3394 | exp_issue_shared_a.blocked_on_iids.append(issue_empty.issue_id) |
| 3395 | # By default new blocked_on issues that appear in blocked_on_iids |
| 3396 | # with no prior rank associated with it are un-ranked and assigned rank 0. |
| 3397 | # See SortBlockedOn in issue_svc.py. |
| 3398 | exp_issue_shared_a.blocked_on_ranks = [0] |
| 3399 | exp_amendments_shared_a = [ |
| 3400 | tracker_bizobj.MakeOwnerAmendment( |
| 3401 | delta_shared.owner_id, issue_shared_a.owner_id), |
| 3402 | tracker_bizobj.MakeBlockedOnAmendment( |
| 3403 | [(issue_empty.project_name, issue_empty.local_id)], [], |
| 3404 | default_project_name=issue_shared_a.project_name)] |
| 3405 | exp_issue_empty.blocking_iids.append(issue_shared_a.issue_id) |
| 3406 | |
| 3407 | # A main issue with a shared delta_shared. |
| 3408 | issue_shared_b = _Issue(789, 4) |
| 3409 | |
| 3410 | exp_issue_shared_b = copy.deepcopy(issue_shared_b) |
| 3411 | exp_issue_shared_b.owner_modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3412 | exp_issue_shared_b.owner_id = delta_shared.owner_id |
| 3413 | exp_issue_shared_b.blocked_on_iids.append(issue_empty.issue_id) |
| 3414 | exp_issue_shared_b.blocked_on_ranks = [0] |
| 3415 | |
| 3416 | exp_amendments_shared_b = [ |
| 3417 | tracker_bizobj.MakeOwnerAmendment( |
| 3418 | delta_shared.owner_id, issue_shared_b.owner_id), |
| 3419 | tracker_bizobj.MakeBlockedOnAmendment( |
| 3420 | [(issue_empty.project_name, issue_empty.local_id)], [], |
| 3421 | default_project_name=issue_shared_b.project_name)] |
| 3422 | exp_issue_empty.blocking_iids.append(issue_shared_b.issue_id) |
| 3423 | |
| 3424 | added_refs = [(issue_shared_b.project_name, issue_shared_b.local_id), |
| 3425 | (issue_shared_a.project_name, issue_shared_a.local_id)] |
| 3426 | exp_amendments_empty_imp.append(tracker_bizobj.MakeBlockingAmendment( |
| 3427 | added_refs, [], default_project_name=issue_empty.project_name)) |
| 3428 | |
| 3429 | # Issues impacted by issue_unique. |
| 3430 | imp_issue_a = _Issue(789, 11) |
| 3431 | imp_issue_a.owner_id = self.user_1.user_id |
| 3432 | imp_issue_b = _Issue(789, 12) |
| 3433 | |
| 3434 | exp_imp_issue_a = copy.deepcopy(imp_issue_a) |
| 3435 | exp_imp_issue_b = copy.deepcopy(imp_issue_b) |
| 3436 | |
| 3437 | # A main issue with a unique delta and impact on imp_issue_{a|b}. |
| 3438 | issue_unique = _Issue(789, 5) |
| 3439 | issue_unique.merged_into = imp_issue_b.issue_id |
| 3440 | delta_unique = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 3441 | merged_into=imp_issue_a.issue_id, status='Duplicate') |
| 3442 | |
| 3443 | exp_issue_unique = copy.deepcopy(issue_unique) |
| 3444 | exp_issue_unique.merged_into = imp_issue_a.issue_id |
| 3445 | exp_issue_unique.status = 'Duplicate' |
| 3446 | exp_issue_unique.status_modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3447 | exp_amendments_unique = [ |
| 3448 | tracker_bizobj.MakeStatusAmendment('Duplicate', ''), |
| 3449 | tracker_bizobj.MakeMergedIntoAmendment( |
| 3450 | [(imp_issue_a.project_name, imp_issue_a.local_id)], |
| 3451 | [(imp_issue_b.project_name, imp_issue_b.local_id)], |
| 3452 | default_project_name=issue_unique.project_name) |
| 3453 | ] |
| 3454 | |
| 3455 | # We star issue_5 and expect this star to be merged into imp_issue. |
| 3456 | exp_imp_starrer = 444 |
| 3457 | self.services.issue_star.SetStar( |
| 3458 | self.cnxn, self.services, None, issue_unique.issue_id, |
| 3459 | exp_imp_starrer, True) |
| 3460 | exp_imp_issue_a.star_count = 1 |
| 3461 | |
| 3462 | # Add a FilterRule for star_count to check filter rules are applied. |
| 3463 | starred_label = 'starry-night' |
| 3464 | self.services.features.TestAddFilterRule( |
| 3465 | 789, 'stars=1', add_labels=[starred_label]) |
| 3466 | exp_imp_issue_a.derived_labels.append(starred_label) |
| 3467 | |
| 3468 | # Setting status away from a MERGED type auto-removes any merged_into. |
| 3469 | issue_unmerged = _Issue(789, 6) |
| 3470 | issue_unmerged.merged_into_external = 'b/123' |
| 3471 | issue_unmerged.status = 'Duplicate' |
| 3472 | delta_unmerged = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(status='Available') |
| 3473 | |
| 3474 | exp_issue_unmerged = copy.deepcopy(issue_unmerged) |
| 3475 | exp_issue_unmerged.status = 'Available' |
| 3476 | exp_issue_unmerged.merged_into_external = '' |
| 3477 | exp_issue_unmerged.merged_into = 0 |
| 3478 | exp_issue_unmerged.status_modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3479 | exp_amendments_unmerged = [ |
| 3480 | tracker_bizobj.MakeStatusAmendment('Available', 'Duplicate'), |
| 3481 | tracker_bizobj.MakeMergedIntoAmendment( |
| 3482 | [], [tracker_pb2.DanglingIssueRef(ext_issue_identifier='b/123')]) |
| 3483 | ] |
| 3484 | |
| 3485 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(imp_issue_a) |
| 3486 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(imp_issue_b) |
| 3487 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_noop) |
| 3488 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_empty) |
| 3489 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_shared_a) |
| 3490 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_shared_b) |
| 3491 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_unique) |
| 3492 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_unmerged) |
| 3493 | |
| 3494 | issue_delta_pairs = [ |
| 3495 | (issue_noop.issue_id, delta_noop), (issue_empty.issue_id, delta_empty), |
| 3496 | (issue_shared_a.issue_id, delta_shared), |
| 3497 | (issue_shared_b.issue_id, delta_shared), |
| 3498 | (issue_unique.issue_id, delta_unique), |
| 3499 | (issue_unmerged.issue_id, delta_unmerged) |
| 3500 | ] |
| 3501 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 3502 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 3503 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing = mock.Mock() |
| 3504 | content = 'Je suis un ananas.' |
| 3505 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 3506 | send_email = True |
| 3507 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3508 | actual_issues = we.ModifyIssues( |
| 3509 | issue_delta_pairs, |
| 3510 | False, |
| 3511 | comment_content=content, |
| 3512 | send_email=send_email) |
| 3513 | |
| 3514 | # Check comments correct. |
| 3515 | # We expect all issues to have a description comment and the comment(s) |
| 3516 | # added from the ModifyIssues() changes. |
| 3517 | (_desc, comment_noop |
| 3518 | ) = self.services.issue.comments_by_iid[issue_noop.issue_id] |
| 3519 | self.assertEqual(comment_noop.amendments, exp_amendments_noop) |
| 3520 | self.assertEqual(comment_noop.content, content) |
| 3521 | |
| 3522 | # Modified issues that are also impacted, get two comments: |
| 3523 | # One with the comment content and, direct issue changes defined in a |
| 3524 | # paired delta. |
| 3525 | # One with the impacted changes with no comment content. |
| 3526 | (_desc, comment_empty, comment_empty_imp |
| 3527 | ) = self.services.issue.comments_by_iid[issue_empty.issue_id] |
| 3528 | self.assertEqual(comment_empty.amendments, exp_amendments_empty) |
| 3529 | self.assertEqual(comment_empty.content, content) |
| 3530 | self.assertEqual(comment_empty_imp.amendments, exp_amendments_empty_imp) |
| 3531 | self.assertEqual(comment_empty_imp.content, '') |
| 3532 | |
| 3533 | [_desc, shared_a_comment] = self.services.issue.comments_by_iid[ |
| 3534 | issue_shared_a.issue_id] |
| 3535 | self.assertEqual(shared_a_comment.amendments, exp_amendments_shared_a) |
| 3536 | self.assertEqual(shared_a_comment.content, content) |
| 3537 | |
| 3538 | (_desc, shared_b_comment) = self.services.issue.comments_by_iid[ |
| 3539 | issue_shared_b.issue_id] |
| 3540 | self.assertEqual(shared_b_comment.amendments, exp_amendments_shared_b) |
| 3541 | self.assertEqual(shared_b_comment.content, content) |
| 3542 | |
| 3543 | (_desc, unique_comment) = self.services.issue.comments_by_iid[ |
| 3544 | issue_unique.issue_id] |
| 3545 | self.assertEqual(unique_comment.amendments, exp_amendments_unique) |
| 3546 | self.assertEqual(unique_comment.content, content) |
| 3547 | |
| 3548 | (_des, unmerged_comment |
| 3549 | ) = self.services.issue.comments_by_iid[issue_unmerged.issue_id] |
| 3550 | self.assertEqual(unmerged_comment.amendments, exp_amendments_unmerged) |
| 3551 | self.assertEqual(unmerged_comment.content, content) |
| 3552 | |
| 3553 | # imp_issue_{a|b} were only an impacted issue and never main issues with |
| 3554 | # IssueDelta changes. Only one comment with impacted changes should |
| 3555 | # have been added. |
| 3556 | (_desc, |
| 3557 | imp_a_comment) = self.services.issue.comments_by_iid[imp_issue_a.issue_id] |
| 3558 | self.assertEqual(imp_a_comment.amendments, []) |
| 3559 | self.assertEqual( |
| 3560 | imp_a_comment.content, |
| 3561 | 'Issue %s has been merged into this issue.\n' % issue_unique.local_id) |
| 3562 | (_desc, |
| 3563 | imp_b_comment) = self.services.issue.comments_by_iid[imp_issue_b.issue_id] |
| 3564 | self.assertEqual(imp_b_comment.amendments, []) |
| 3565 | self.assertEqual( |
| 3566 | imp_b_comment.content, |
| 3567 | 'Issue %s has been un-merged from this issue.\n' % |
| 3568 | issue_unique.local_id) |
| 3569 | |
| 3570 | # Check stars correct. |
| 3571 | self.assertEqual( |
| 3572 | [exp_imp_starrer], |
| 3573 | self.services.issue_star.stars_by_item_id[imp_issue_a.issue_id]) |
| 3574 | |
| 3575 | # Check issues correct. |
| 3576 | expected_issues = [ |
| 3577 | exp_issue_noop, exp_issue_empty, exp_issue_shared_a, exp_issue_shared_b, |
| 3578 | exp_issue_unique, exp_imp_issue_a, exp_imp_issue_b, exp_issue_unmerged |
| 3579 | ] |
| 3580 | # Check we successfully updated these in our services layer. |
| 3581 | for exp_issue in expected_issues: |
| 3582 | # All updated issues should have been fetched from DB, skipping cache. |
| 3583 | # So we expect assume_stale=False was applied to all issues during the |
| 3584 | # the fetch. |
| 3585 | exp_issue.assume_stale = False |
| 3586 | # These derived values get set to the following when an issue goes through |
| 3587 | # the ApplyFilterRules path. (see filter_helpers._ComputeDerivedFields) |
| 3588 | # issue_noop had no changes so filter rules were never applied to it. |
| 3589 | if exp_issue != exp_issue_noop: |
| 3590 | exp_issue.derived_status = '' |
| 3591 | exp_issue.derived_owner_id = 0 |
| 3592 | |
| 3593 | exp_issue.modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3594 | |
| 3595 | self.assertEqual( |
| 3596 | exp_issue, self.services.issue.GetIssue(self.cnxn, exp_issue.issue_id)) |
| 3597 | # Check the expected issues were successfully returned. |
| 3598 | exp_actual_issues = [ |
| 3599 | exp_issue_noop, exp_issue_empty, exp_issue_shared_a, exp_issue_shared_b, |
| 3600 | exp_issue_unique, exp_issue_unmerged |
| 3601 | ] |
| 3602 | self.assertEqual(len(exp_actual_issues), len(actual_issues)) |
| 3603 | for issue in actual_issues: |
| 3604 | self.assertTrue(issue in exp_actual_issues) |
| 3605 | |
| 3606 | # Check notifications sent. |
| 3607 | hostport = 'testing-app.appspot.com' |
| 3608 | expected_notify_calls = [ |
| 3609 | # Notified as a main issue update. |
| 3610 | mock.call( |
| 3611 | issue_noop.issue_id, |
| 3612 | hostport, |
| 3613 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3614 | old_owner_id=None, |
| 3615 | comment_id=comment_noop.id, |
| 3616 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3617 | # Notified as a main issue update. |
| 3618 | mock.call( |
| 3619 | issue_empty.issue_id, |
| 3620 | hostport, |
| 3621 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3622 | old_owner_id=None, |
| 3623 | comment_id=comment_empty.id, |
| 3624 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3625 | # Notified as a main issue update. |
| 3626 | mock.call( |
| 3627 | issue_unique.issue_id, |
| 3628 | hostport, |
| 3629 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3630 | old_owner_id=None, |
| 3631 | comment_id=unique_comment.id, |
| 3632 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3633 | # Notified as a main issue update. |
| 3634 | mock.call( |
| 3635 | issue_unmerged.issue_id, |
| 3636 | hostport, |
| 3637 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3638 | old_owner_id=None, |
| 3639 | comment_id=unmerged_comment.id, |
| 3640 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3641 | # Notified as an impacted issue update. |
| 3642 | mock.call( |
| 3643 | imp_issue_b.issue_id, |
| 3644 | hostport, |
| 3645 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3646 | comment_id=imp_b_comment.id, |
| 3647 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3648 | # Notified as an impacted issue update. |
| 3649 | mock.call( |
| 3650 | issue_empty.issue_id, |
| 3651 | hostport, |
| 3652 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3653 | comment_id=comment_empty_imp.id, |
| 3654 | send_email=send_email), |
| 3655 | # Notified as an impacted issue update. |
| 3656 | mock.call( |
| 3657 | imp_issue_a.issue_id, |
| 3658 | hostport, |
| 3659 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3660 | comment_id=imp_a_comment.id, |
| 3661 | send_email=send_email) |
| 3662 | ] |
| 3663 | fake_notify.assert_has_calls(expected_notify_calls) |
| 3664 | old_owner_ids = [] |
| 3665 | shared_amendments = exp_amendments_shared_a + exp_amendments_shared_b |
| 3666 | users_by_id = {0: mock.ANY, 111: mock.ANY} |
| 3667 | fake_bulk_notify.assert_called_once_with( |
| 3668 | {issue_shared_a.issue_id, issue_shared_b.issue_id}, hostport, |
| 3669 | old_owner_ids, content, self.user_1.user_id, shared_amendments, |
| 3670 | send_email, users_by_id) |
| 3671 | |
| 3672 | # Check issues enqueued for indexing. |
| 3673 | reindex_iids = {issue.issue_id for issue in expected_issues} |
| 3674 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing.assert_called_once_with( |
| 3675 | self.mr.cnxn, reindex_iids, commit=False) |
| 3676 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit.assert_called_once() |
| 3677 | |
| 3678 | @mock.patch( |
| 3679 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3680 | @mock.patch('features.send_notifications.SendIssueBulkChangeNotification') |
| 3681 | @mock.patch('time.time') |
| 3682 | def testModifyIssues_ComponentModified( |
| 3683 | self, fake_time, fake_bulk_notify, fake_notify): |
| 3684 | fake_time.return_value = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3685 | |
| 3686 | issue = _Issue(789, 1) |
| 3687 | issue.component_ids = [self.component_id_1] |
| 3688 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta( |
| 3689 | comp_ids_add=[self.component_id_2], |
| 3690 | comp_ids_remove=[self.component_id_1]) |
| 3691 | |
| 3692 | exp_issue = copy.deepcopy(issue) |
| 3693 | |
| 3694 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 3695 | |
| 3696 | issue_delta_pairs = [(issue.issue_id, delta)] |
| 3697 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 3698 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 3699 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing = mock.Mock() |
| 3700 | content = 'Modifying component' |
| 3701 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 3702 | send_email = True |
| 3703 | |
| 3704 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3705 | we.ModifyIssues( |
| 3706 | issue_delta_pairs, |
| 3707 | False, |
| 3708 | comment_content=content, |
| 3709 | send_email=send_email) |
| 3710 | |
| 3711 | exp_issue.modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3712 | exp_issue.component_modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3713 | exp_issue.component_ids = [self.component_id_2] |
| 3714 | |
| 3715 | exp_issue.derived_status = '' |
| 3716 | exp_issue.derived_owner_id = 0 |
| 3717 | exp_issue.assume_stale = False |
| 3718 | |
| 3719 | self.assertEqual( |
| 3720 | exp_issue, self.services.issue.GetIssue(self.cnxn, exp_issue.issue_id)) |
| 3721 | |
| 3722 | fake_bulk_notify.assert_not_called() |
| 3723 | fake_notify.assert_called() |
| 3724 | |
| 3725 | @mock.patch( |
| 3726 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3727 | @mock.patch('features.send_notifications.SendIssueBulkChangeNotification') |
| 3728 | @mock.patch('time.time') |
| 3729 | def testModifyIssues_StatusModified( |
| 3730 | self, fake_time, fake_bulk_notify, fake_notify): |
| 3731 | fake_time.return_value = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3732 | |
| 3733 | issue = _Issue(789, 1) |
| 3734 | issue.status = 'New' |
| 3735 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(status='Fixed') |
| 3736 | |
| 3737 | exp_issue = copy.deepcopy(issue) |
| 3738 | |
| 3739 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 3740 | |
| 3741 | issue_delta_pairs = [(issue.issue_id, delta)] |
| 3742 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 3743 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 3744 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing = mock.Mock() |
| 3745 | content = 'Modifying status' |
| 3746 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 3747 | send_email = True |
| 3748 | |
| 3749 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3750 | we.ModifyIssues( |
| 3751 | issue_delta_pairs, |
| 3752 | False, |
| 3753 | comment_content=content, |
| 3754 | send_email=send_email) |
| 3755 | |
| 3756 | exp_issue.modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3757 | exp_issue.status_modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3758 | exp_issue.closed_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3759 | exp_issue.status = 'Fixed' |
| 3760 | |
| 3761 | exp_issue.derived_status = '' |
| 3762 | exp_issue.derived_owner_id = 0 |
| 3763 | exp_issue.assume_stale = False |
| 3764 | |
| 3765 | self.assertEqual( |
| 3766 | exp_issue, self.services.issue.GetIssue(self.cnxn, exp_issue.issue_id)) |
| 3767 | |
| 3768 | fake_bulk_notify.assert_not_called() |
| 3769 | fake_notify.assert_called() |
| 3770 | |
| 3771 | # We must redirect the testing environment's default domain to a |
| 3772 | # non-appspot.com one, in order for the per-project branded domains to get |
| 3773 | # used. See framework_helpers.GetNeededDomain(). |
| 3774 | @mock.patch( |
| 3775 | 'settings.preferred_domains', {'testing-app.appspot.com': 'example.com'}) |
| 3776 | @mock.patch( |
| 3777 | 'settings.branded_domains', { |
| 3778 | 'proj-783': '783.com', 'proj-782': '782.com', 'proj-781': '781.com'}) |
| 3779 | @mock.patch( |
| 3780 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3781 | @mock.patch('features.send_notifications.SendIssueBulkChangeNotification') |
| 3782 | @mock.patch('time.time') |
| 3783 | def testModifyIssues_MultiProjectChanges( |
| 3784 | self, fake_time, fake_bulk_notify, fake_notify): |
| 3785 | fake_time.return_value = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3786 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 3787 | 'proj-783', project_id=783, committer_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 3788 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 3789 | 'proj-782', project_id=782, committer_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 3790 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 3791 | 'proj-781', project_id=781, committer_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 3792 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(cc_ids_add=[self.user_2.user_id]) |
| 3793 | |
| 3794 | def setUpIssue(pid, local_id): |
| 3795 | issue = _Issue(pid, local_id) |
| 3796 | exp_amendments = [tracker_bizobj.MakeCcAmendment(delta.cc_ids_add, [])] |
| 3797 | exp_issue = copy.deepcopy(issue) |
| 3798 | exp_issue.cc_ids.extend(delta.cc_ids_add) |
| 3799 | exp_issue.modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3800 | return issue, exp_amendments, exp_issue |
| 3801 | |
| 3802 | # We expect fake_bulk_notify to send these issues' notifications. |
| 3803 | issue_p1a, exp_amendments_p1a, exp_p1a = setUpIssue(781, 1) |
| 3804 | issue_p1b, exp_amendments_p1b, exp_p1b = setUpIssue(781, 2) |
| 3805 | |
| 3806 | # We expect fake_notify to send this issue's notification. |
| 3807 | issue_p2, exp_amendments_p2, exp_p2 = setUpIssue(782, 1) |
| 3808 | |
| 3809 | # We expect fake_bulk_notify to send these issues' notifications. |
| 3810 | issue_p3a, exp_amendments_p3a, exp_p3a = setUpIssue(783, 1) |
| 3811 | issue_p3b, exp_amendments_p3b, exp_p3b = setUpIssue(783, 2) |
| 3812 | |
| 3813 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_p1a) |
| 3814 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_p1b) |
| 3815 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_p2) |
| 3816 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_p3a) |
| 3817 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_p3b) |
| 3818 | |
| 3819 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 3820 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 3821 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing = mock.Mock() |
| 3822 | issue_delta_pairs = [(issue_p1a.issue_id, delta), |
| 3823 | (issue_p1b.issue_id, delta), |
| 3824 | (issue_p2.issue_id, delta), |
| 3825 | (issue_p3a.issue_id, delta), |
| 3826 | (issue_p3b.issue_id, delta)] |
| 3827 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 3828 | content = None |
| 3829 | send_email = True |
| 3830 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3831 | actual_issues = we.ModifyIssues( |
| 3832 | issue_delta_pairs, False, send_email=send_email) |
| 3833 | |
| 3834 | # Check comments. |
| 3835 | # We expect all issues to have a description comment and the comment(s) |
| 3836 | # added from the ModifyIssues() changes. |
| 3837 | def CheckComment(issue_id, exp_amendments): |
| 3838 | (_desc, comment) = self.services.issue.comments_by_iid[issue_id] |
| 3839 | self.assertEqual(comment.amendments, exp_amendments) |
| 3840 | self.assertEqual(comment.content, content) |
| 3841 | return comment |
| 3842 | |
| 3843 | _comment_p1a = CheckComment(issue_p1a.issue_id, exp_amendments_p1a) |
| 3844 | _comment_p1b = CheckComment(issue_p1b.issue_id, exp_amendments_p1b) |
| 3845 | comment_p2 = CheckComment(issue_p2.issue_id, exp_amendments_p2) |
| 3846 | _comment_p3a = CheckComment(issue_p3a.issue_id, exp_amendments_p3a) |
| 3847 | _comment_p3b = CheckComment(issue_p3b.issue_id, exp_amendments_p3b) |
| 3848 | |
| 3849 | # Check issues. |
| 3850 | exp_issues = [exp_p1a, exp_p1b, exp_p2, exp_p3a, exp_p3b] |
| 3851 | for exp_issue in exp_issues: |
| 3852 | # All updated issues should have been fetched from DB, skipping cache. |
| 3853 | # So we expect assume_stale=False was applied to all issues during the |
| 3854 | # the fetch. |
| 3855 | exp_issue.assume_stale = False |
| 3856 | # These derived values get set to the following when an issue goes through |
| 3857 | # the ApplyFilterRules path. (see filter_helpers._ComputeDerivedFields) |
| 3858 | exp_issue.derived_status = '' |
| 3859 | exp_issue.derived_owner_id = 0 |
| 3860 | # Check we successfully updated these issues in our services layer. |
| 3861 | self.assertEqual(exp_issue, self.services.issue.GetIssue( |
| 3862 | self.cnxn, exp_issue.issue_id)) |
| 3863 | # Check the expected issues were successfully returned. |
| 3864 | self.assertTrue(exp_issue in actual_issues) |
| 3865 | |
| 3866 | # Check issues enqueued for indexing. |
| 3867 | reindex_iids = {issue.issue_id for issue in exp_issues} |
| 3868 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing.assert_called_once_with( |
| 3869 | self.mr.cnxn, reindex_iids, commit=False) |
| 3870 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit.assert_called_once() |
| 3871 | |
| 3872 | # Check notifications. |
| 3873 | p2_hostport = '782.com' |
| 3874 | fake_notify.assert_called_once_with( |
| 3875 | issue_p2.issue_id, |
| 3876 | p2_hostport, |
| 3877 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 3878 | old_owner_id=None, |
| 3879 | comment_id=comment_p2.id, |
| 3880 | send_email=send_email) |
| 3881 | |
| 3882 | p1_hostport = '781.com' |
| 3883 | p1_amendments = exp_amendments_p1a + exp_amendments_p1b |
| 3884 | p3_hostport = '783.com' |
| 3885 | p3_amendments = exp_amendments_p3a + exp_amendments_p3b |
| 3886 | users_by_id = {222: mock.ANY} |
| 3887 | old_owners = [] |
| 3888 | expected_bulk_calls = [ |
| 3889 | mock.call({issue_p3a.issue_id, issue_p3b.issue_id}, p3_hostport, |
| 3890 | old_owners, content, self.user_1.user_id, p3_amendments, |
| 3891 | send_email, users_by_id), |
| 3892 | mock.call({issue_p1a.issue_id, issue_p1b.issue_id}, p1_hostport, |
| 3893 | old_owners, content, self.user_1.user_id, p1_amendments, |
| 3894 | send_email, users_by_id)] |
| 3895 | fake_bulk_notify.assert_has_calls(expected_bulk_calls, any_order=True) |
| 3896 | |
| 3897 | def testModifyIssues_PermDenied(self): |
| 3898 | """Test that AssertUsercanModifyIssues is called.""" |
| 3899 | issue = _Issue(789, 1) |
| 3900 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(labels_add=['some-label']) |
| 3901 | non_member = self.services.user.TestAddUser('non_member@example.com', 666) |
| 3902 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 3903 | self.SignIn(non_member.user_id) |
| 3904 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 3905 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3906 | we.ModifyIssues( |
| 3907 | [(issue.issue_id, delta)], False, comment_content='bad chicken') |
| 3908 | |
| 3909 | # Detailed change validation testing happens in tracker_helpers_test. |
| 3910 | def testModifyIssues_InvalidChange(self): |
| 3911 | """Test that we check issue change validity.""" |
| 3912 | non_member = self.services.user.TestAddUser('non_member@example.com', 666) |
| 3913 | issue = _Issue(789, 1) |
| 3914 | delta = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(owner_id=non_member.user_id) |
| 3915 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 3916 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 3917 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 3918 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3919 | we.ModifyIssues( |
| 3920 | [(issue.issue_id, delta)], False, comment_content='bad chicken') |
| 3921 | |
| 3922 | @mock.patch( |
| 3923 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3924 | @mock.patch('features.send_notifications.SendIssueBulkChangeNotification') |
| 3925 | def testModifyIssues_Noop(self, fake_bulk_notify, fake_notify): |
| 3926 | issue_empty = _Issue(789, 1) |
| 3927 | delta_empty = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 3928 | |
| 3929 | issue_noop = _Issue(789, 2) |
| 3930 | issue_noop.owner_id = self.user_2.user_id |
| 3931 | delta_noop = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(owner_id=issue_noop.owner_id) |
| 3932 | |
| 3933 | delta_noop_shared = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta(owner_id=issue_noop.owner_id) |
| 3934 | issue_noop_shared_a = _Issue(789, 3) |
| 3935 | issue_noop_shared_a.owner_id = delta_noop_shared.owner_id |
| 3936 | issue_noop_shared_b = _Issue(789, 4) |
| 3937 | issue_noop_shared_b.owner_id = delta_noop_shared.owner_id |
| 3938 | |
| 3939 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_empty) |
| 3940 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_noop) |
| 3941 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_noop_shared_a) |
| 3942 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_noop_shared_b) |
| 3943 | |
| 3944 | exp_issues = [ |
| 3945 | copy.deepcopy(issue_empty), |
| 3946 | copy.deepcopy(issue_noop), |
| 3947 | copy.deepcopy(issue_noop_shared_a), |
| 3948 | copy.deepcopy(issue_noop_shared_b) |
| 3949 | ] |
| 3950 | |
| 3951 | issue_delta_pairs = [(issue_empty.issue_id, delta_empty), |
| 3952 | (issue_noop.issue_id, delta_noop), |
| 3953 | (issue_noop_shared_a.issue_id, delta_noop_shared), |
| 3954 | (issue_noop_shared_b.issue_id, delta_noop_shared)] |
| 3955 | |
| 3956 | |
| 3957 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 3958 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 3959 | self.services.issue.UpdateIssue = mock.Mock() |
| 3960 | self.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch_SkipIssueUpdate = mock.Mock() |
| 3961 | self.services.issue.CreateIssueComment = mock.Mock() |
| 3962 | self.services.project.UpdateProject = mock.Mock() |
| 3963 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing = mock.Mock() |
| 3964 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 3965 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 3966 | issues = we.ModifyIssues(issue_delta_pairs, False, send_email=True) |
| 3967 | |
| 3968 | for exp_issue in exp_issues: |
| 3969 | exp_issue.assume_stale = False |
| 3970 | # Check issues remained the same with no changes. |
| 3971 | self.assertEqual( |
| 3972 | exp_issue, |
| 3973 | self.services.issue.GetIssue(self.cnxn, exp_issue.issue_id)) |
| 3974 | |
| 3975 | self.assertFalse(issues) |
| 3976 | self.services.issue.UpdateIssue.assert_not_called() |
| 3977 | self.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch_SkipIssueUpdate.assert_not_called() |
| 3978 | self.services.issue.CreateIssueComment.assert_not_called() |
| 3979 | self.services.project.UpdateProject.assert_not_called() |
| 3980 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing.assert_not_called() |
| 3981 | fake_bulk_notify.assert_not_called() |
| 3982 | fake_notify.assert_not_called() |
| 3983 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit.assert_not_called() |
| 3984 | |
| 3985 | @mock.patch( |
| 3986 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 3987 | @mock.patch('features.send_notifications.SendIssueBulkChangeNotification') |
| 3988 | @mock.patch('time.time') |
| 3989 | def testModifyIssues_CommentWithNoChanges( |
| 3990 | self, fake_time, fake_bulk_notify, fake_notify): |
| 3991 | fake_time.return_value = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3992 | |
| 3993 | issue = _Issue(789, 1) |
| 3994 | delta_empty = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 3995 | |
| 3996 | exp_issue = copy.deepcopy(issue) |
| 3997 | exp_issue.modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 3998 | exp_issue.assume_stale = False |
| 3999 | |
| 4000 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4001 | |
| 4002 | issue_delta_pairs = [(issue.issue_id, delta_empty)] |
| 4003 | |
| 4004 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 4005 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 4006 | self.services.issue.UpdateIssue = mock.Mock() |
| 4007 | self.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch_SkipIssueUpdate = mock.Mock() |
| 4008 | self.services.issue.CreateIssueComment = mock.Mock() |
| 4009 | self.services.project.UpdateProject = mock.Mock() |
| 4010 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing = mock.Mock() |
| 4011 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 4012 | |
| 4013 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4014 | issues = we.ModifyIssues( |
| 4015 | issue_delta_pairs, False, comment_content='invisible chickens') |
| 4016 | |
| 4017 | self.assertEqual(len(issues), 1) |
| 4018 | self.assertEqual(exp_issue, issues[0]) |
| 4019 | self.assertEqual( |
| 4020 | exp_issue, self.services.issue.GetIssue(self.cnxn, exp_issue.issue_id)) |
| 4021 | |
| 4022 | self.services.issue.UpdateIssue.assert_not_called() |
| 4023 | self.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch_SkipIssueUpdate.assert_not_called() |
| 4024 | self.services.issue.CreateIssueComment.assert_called() |
| 4025 | self.services.project.UpdateProject.assert_not_called() |
| 4026 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing.assert_called() |
| 4027 | |
| 4028 | fake_bulk_notify.assert_not_called() |
| 4029 | fake_notify.assert_called() |
| 4030 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit.assert_called() |
| 4031 | # The closed_timestamp has ben reset to its default value of 0. |
| 4032 | self.assertEqual( |
| 4033 | 0, |
| 4034 | self.services.issue.GetIssue(self.cnxn, |
| 4035 | exp_issue.issue_id).closed_timestamp) |
| 4036 | |
| 4037 | @mock.patch( |
| 4038 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 4039 | @mock.patch('features.send_notifications.SendIssueBulkChangeNotification') |
| 4040 | @mock.patch('time.time') |
| 4041 | def testModifyIssues_AttachmentsWithNoChanges( |
| 4042 | self, fake_time, fake_bulk_notify, fake_notify): |
| 4043 | |
| 4044 | fake_time.return_value = self.PAST_TIME |
| 4045 | |
| 4046 | issue = _Issue(789, 1) |
| 4047 | delta_empty = tracker_pb2.IssueDelta() |
| 4048 | |
| 4049 | exp_issue = copy.deepcopy(issue) |
| 4050 | exp_issue.modified_timestamp = self.PAST_TIME |
| 4051 | exp_issue.assume_stale = False |
| 4052 | |
| 4053 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4054 | |
| 4055 | issue_delta_pairs = [(issue.issue_id, delta_empty)] |
| 4056 | |
| 4057 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 4058 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 4059 | self.services.issue.UpdateIssue = mock.Mock() |
| 4060 | self.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch_SkipIssueUpdate = mock.Mock() |
| 4061 | self.services.issue.CreateIssueComment = mock.Mock() |
| 4062 | self.services.project.UpdateProject = mock.Mock() |
| 4063 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing = mock.Mock() |
| 4064 | self.SignIn(self.user_1.user_id) |
| 4065 | |
| 4066 | upload = framework_helpers.AttachmentUpload( |
| 4067 | 'BEAR-necessities', 'Forget about your worries and your strife', |
| 4068 | 'text/plain') |
| 4069 | |
| 4070 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4071 | issues = we.ModifyIssues(issue_delta_pairs, attachment_uploads=[upload]) |
| 4072 | |
| 4073 | self.assertEqual(len(issues), 1) |
| 4074 | self.assertEqual(exp_issue, issues[0]) |
| 4075 | self.assertEqual( |
| 4076 | exp_issue, self.services.issue.GetIssue(self.cnxn, exp_issue.issue_id)) |
| 4077 | |
| 4078 | self.services.issue.UpdateIssue.assert_not_called() |
| 4079 | self.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch_SkipIssueUpdate.assert_not_called() |
| 4080 | self.services.issue.CreateIssueComment.assert_called() |
| 4081 | self.services.project.UpdateProject.assert_called() |
| 4082 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing.assert_called() |
| 4083 | |
| 4084 | fake_bulk_notify.assert_not_called() |
| 4085 | fake_notify.assert_called() |
| 4086 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit.assert_called() |
| 4087 | |
| 4088 | @mock.patch( |
| 4089 | 'features.send_notifications.PrepareAndSendIssueChangeNotification') |
| 4090 | @mock.patch('features.send_notifications.SendIssueBulkChangeNotification') |
| 4091 | def testModifyIssues_Empty(self, fake_bulk_notify, fake_notify): |
| 4092 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 4093 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 4094 | self.services.issue.UpdateIssue = mock.Mock() |
| 4095 | self.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch_SkipIssueUpdate = mock.Mock() |
| 4096 | self.services.issue.CreateIssueComment = mock.Mock() |
| 4097 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing = mock.Mock() |
| 4098 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4099 | issues = we.ModifyIssues([], False, comment_content='invisible chickens') |
| 4100 | |
| 4101 | self.assertFalse(issues) |
| 4102 | self.services.issue.UpdateIssue.assert_not_called() |
| 4103 | self.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch_SkipIssueUpdate.assert_not_called() |
| 4104 | self.services.issue.CreateIssueComment.assert_not_called() |
| 4105 | self.services.issue.EnqueueIssuesForIndexing.assert_not_called() |
| 4106 | fake_bulk_notify.assert_not_called() |
| 4107 | fake_notify.assert_not_called() |
| 4108 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit.assert_not_called() |
| 4109 | |
| 4110 | |
| 4111 | def testModifyIssuesBulkNotifyForDelta(self): |
| 4112 | # Integrate tested in ModifyIssues tests as the main concern is |
| 4113 | # if BulkNotify and Notify work correctly together in the ModifyIssues |
| 4114 | # context. |
| 4115 | pass |
| 4116 | |
| 4117 | def testModifyIssuesNotifyForDelta(self): |
| 4118 | # Integrate tested in ModifyIssues tests as the main concern is |
| 4119 | # if BulkNotify and Notify work correctly together in the ModifyIssues |
| 4120 | # context. |
| 4121 | pass |
| 4122 | |
| 4123 | def testDeleteIssue(self): |
| 4124 | """We can mark and unmark an issue as deleted.""" |
| 4125 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 4126 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4127 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4128 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4129 | _actual = we.DeleteIssue(issue, True) |
| 4130 | self.assertTrue(issue.deleted) |
| 4131 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4132 | _actual = we.DeleteIssue(issue, False) |
| 4133 | self.assertFalse(issue.deleted) |
| 4134 | |
| 4135 | def testFlagIssue_Normal(self): |
| 4136 | """Users can mark and unmark an issue as spam.""" |
| 4137 | self.services.user.TestAddUser('user222@example.com', 222) |
| 4138 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 4139 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4140 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4141 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4142 | we.FlagIssues([issue], True) |
| 4143 | self.assertEqual( |
| 4144 | [222], self.services.spam.reports_by_issue_id[78901]) |
| 4145 | self.assertNotIn( |
| 4146 | 222, self.services.spam.manual_verdicts_by_issue_id[78901]) |
| 4147 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4148 | we.FlagIssues([issue], False) |
| 4149 | self.assertEqual( |
| 4150 | [], self.services.spam.reports_by_issue_id[78901]) |
| 4151 | self.assertNotIn( |
| 4152 | 222, self.services.spam.manual_verdicts_by_issue_id[78901]) |
| 4153 | |
| 4154 | def testFlagIssue_AutoVerdict(self): |
| 4155 | """Admins can mark and unmark an issue as spam and it counts as verdict.""" |
| 4156 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 4157 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4158 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4159 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4160 | we.FlagIssues([issue], True) |
| 4161 | self.assertEqual( |
| 4162 | [444], self.services.spam.reports_by_issue_id[78901]) |
| 4163 | self.assertTrue(self.services.spam.manual_verdicts_by_issue_id[78901][444]) |
| 4164 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4165 | we.FlagIssues([issue], False) |
| 4166 | self.assertEqual( |
| 4167 | [], self.services.spam.reports_by_issue_id[78901]) |
| 4168 | self.assertFalse( |
| 4169 | self.services.spam.manual_verdicts_by_issue_id[78901][444]) |
| 4170 | |
| 4171 | def testFlagIssue_NotAllowed(self): |
| 4172 | """Anons can't mark issues as spam.""" |
| 4173 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4174 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4175 | |
| 4176 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4177 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4178 | we.FlagIssues([issue], True) |
| 4179 | |
| 4180 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4181 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4182 | we.FlagIssues([issue], False) |
| 4183 | |
| 4184 | def testLookupIssuesFlaggers_Normal(self): |
| 4185 | issue_1 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4186 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_1) |
| 4187 | comment_1_1 = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4188 | project_id=789, content='lorem ipsum', user_id=111, |
| 4189 | issue_id=issue_1.issue_id) |
| 4190 | comment_1_2 = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4191 | project_id=789, content='dolor sit amet', user_id=111, |
| 4192 | issue_id=issue_1.issue_id) |
| 4193 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment_1_1, 1) |
| 4194 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment_1_2, 1) |
| 4195 | |
| 4196 | issue_2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78902) |
| 4197 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_2) |
| 4198 | comment_2_1 = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4199 | project_id=789, content='lorem ipsum', user_id=111, |
| 4200 | issue_id=issue_2.issue_id) |
| 4201 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment_2_1, 2) |
| 4202 | |
| 4203 | |
| 4204 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 4205 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4206 | we.FlagIssues([issue_1], True) |
| 4207 | |
| 4208 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4209 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4210 | we.FlagComment(issue_1, comment_1_2, True) |
| 4211 | we.FlagComment(issue_2, comment_2_1, True) |
| 4212 | |
| 4213 | reporters = we.LookupIssuesFlaggers([issue_1, issue_2]) |
| 4214 | self.assertEqual({ |
| 4215 | issue_1.issue_id: ([222], {comment_1_2.id: [111]}), |
| 4216 | issue_2.issue_id: ([], {comment_2_1.id: [111]}), |
| 4217 | }, reporters) |
| 4218 | |
| 4219 | def testLookupIssueFlaggers_Normal(self): |
| 4220 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4221 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4222 | comment_1 = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4223 | project_id=789, content='lorem ipsum', user_id=111, |
| 4224 | issue_id=issue.issue_id) |
| 4225 | comment_2 = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4226 | project_id=789, content='dolor sit amet', user_id=111, |
| 4227 | issue_id=issue.issue_id) |
| 4228 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment_1, 1) |
| 4229 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment_2, 2) |
| 4230 | |
| 4231 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 4232 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4233 | we.FlagIssues([issue], True) |
| 4234 | |
| 4235 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4236 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4237 | we.FlagComment(issue, comment_2, True) |
| 4238 | issue_reporters, comment_reporters = we.LookupIssueFlaggers(issue) |
| 4239 | self.assertEqual([222], issue_reporters) |
| 4240 | self.assertEqual({comment_2.id: [111]}, comment_reporters) |
| 4241 | |
| 4242 | def testGetIssuePositionInHotlist(self): |
| 4243 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4244 | 789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', self.user_1.user_id, issue_id=78901) |
| 4245 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 4246 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4247 | 789, 2, 'sum1', 'New', self.user_2.user_id, issue_id=78902) |
| 4248 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 4249 | issue3 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4250 | 789, 3, 'sum1', 'New', self.user_3.user_id, issue_id=78903) |
| 4251 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue3) |
| 4252 | |
| 4253 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 4254 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 4255 | owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id], editor_ids=[]) |
| 4256 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id, issue_id=issue2.issue_id) |
| 4257 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id, issue_id=issue1.issue_id) |
| 4258 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id, issue_id=issue3.issue_id) |
| 4259 | |
| 4260 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4261 | prev_iid, cur_index, next_iid, total_count = we.GetIssuePositionInHotlist( |
| 4262 | issue1, hotlist, 1, 'rank', '') |
| 4263 | |
| 4264 | self.assertEqual(prev_iid, issue2.issue_id) |
| 4265 | self.assertEqual(cur_index, 1) |
| 4266 | self.assertEqual(next_iid, issue3.issue_id) |
| 4267 | self.assertEqual(total_count, 3) |
| 4268 | |
| 4269 | def testRerankBlockedOnIssues_SplitBelow(self): |
| 4270 | parent_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4271 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj', issue_id=1001) |
| 4272 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(parent_issue) |
| 4273 | |
| 4274 | issues = [] |
| 4275 | for idx in range(2, 6): |
| 4276 | issues.append(fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4277 | 789, idx, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj', issue_id=1000+idx)) |
| 4278 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issues[-1]) |
| 4279 | parent_issue.blocked_on_iids.append(issues[-1].issue_id) |
| 4280 | next_rank = sys.maxint |
| 4281 | if parent_issue.blocked_on_ranks: |
| 4282 | next_rank = parent_issue.blocked_on_ranks[-1] - 1 |
| 4283 | parent_issue.blocked_on_ranks.append(next_rank) |
| 4284 | |
| 4285 | self.SignIn() |
| 4286 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4287 | we.RerankBlockedOnIssues(parent_issue, 1002, 1004, False) |
| 4288 | new_parent_issue = we.GetIssue(1001) |
| 4289 | |
| 4290 | self.assertEqual([1003, 1004, 1002, 1005], new_parent_issue.blocked_on_iids) |
| 4291 | |
| 4292 | def testRerankBlockedOnIssues_SplitAbove(self): |
| 4293 | parent_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4294 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj', issue_id=1001) |
| 4295 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(parent_issue) |
| 4296 | |
| 4297 | issues = [] |
| 4298 | for idx in range(2, 6): |
| 4299 | issues.append(fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4300 | 789, idx, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj', issue_id=1000+idx)) |
| 4301 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issues[-1]) |
| 4302 | parent_issue.blocked_on_iids.append(issues[-1].issue_id) |
| 4303 | next_rank = sys.maxint |
| 4304 | if parent_issue.blocked_on_ranks: |
| 4305 | next_rank = parent_issue.blocked_on_ranks[-1] - 1 |
| 4306 | parent_issue.blocked_on_ranks.append(next_rank) |
| 4307 | |
| 4308 | self.SignIn() |
| 4309 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4310 | we.RerankBlockedOnIssues(parent_issue, 1002, 1004, True) |
| 4311 | new_parent_issue = we.GetIssue(1001) |
| 4312 | |
| 4313 | self.assertEqual([1003, 1002, 1004, 1005], new_parent_issue.blocked_on_iids) |
| 4314 | |
| 4315 | @mock.patch('tracker.rerank_helpers.MAX_RANKING', 1) |
| 4316 | def testRerankBlockedOnIssues_NoRoom(self): |
| 4317 | parent_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4318 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj', issue_id=1001) |
| 4319 | parent_issue.blocked_on_ranks = [1, 0, 0] |
| 4320 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(parent_issue) |
| 4321 | |
| 4322 | issues = [] |
| 4323 | for idx in range(2, 5): |
| 4324 | issues.append(fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4325 | 789, idx, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj', issue_id=1000+idx)) |
| 4326 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issues[-1]) |
| 4327 | parent_issue.blocked_on_iids.append(issues[-1].issue_id) |
| 4328 | |
| 4329 | self.SignIn() |
| 4330 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4331 | we.RerankBlockedOnIssues(parent_issue, 1003, 1004, True) |
| 4332 | new_parent_issue = we.GetIssue(1001) |
| 4333 | |
| 4334 | self.assertEqual([1002, 1003, 1004], new_parent_issue.blocked_on_iids) |
| 4335 | |
| 4336 | def testRerankBlockedOnIssues_CantEditIssue(self): |
| 4337 | parent_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4338 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 555, project_name='proj', issue_id=1001) |
| 4339 | parent_issue.labels = ['Restrict-EditIssue-Foo'] |
| 4340 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(parent_issue) |
| 4341 | |
| 4342 | self.SignIn() |
| 4343 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4344 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4345 | we.RerankBlockedOnIssues(parent_issue, 1003, 1002, True) |
| 4346 | |
| 4347 | def testRerankBlockedOnIssues_MovedNotOnBlockedOn(self): |
| 4348 | parent_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4349 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj', issue_id=1001) |
| 4350 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(parent_issue) |
| 4351 | |
| 4352 | self.SignIn() |
| 4353 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 4354 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4355 | we.RerankBlockedOnIssues(parent_issue, 1003, 1002, True) |
| 4356 | |
| 4357 | def testRerankBlockedOnIssues_TargetNotOnBlockedOn(self): |
| 4358 | moved = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4359 | 789, 2, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj', issue_id=1002) |
| 4360 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(moved) |
| 4361 | parent_issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4362 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, project_name='proj', issue_id=1001) |
| 4363 | parent_issue.blocked_on_iids = [1002] |
| 4364 | parent_issue.blocked_on_ranks = [1] |
| 4365 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(parent_issue) |
| 4366 | |
| 4367 | self.SignIn() |
| 4368 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 4369 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4370 | we.RerankBlockedOnIssues(parent_issue, 1002, 1003, True) |
| 4371 | |
| 4372 | # FUTURE: GetIssuePermissionsForUser() |
| 4373 | |
| 4374 | # FUTURE: CreateComment() |
| 4375 | |
| 4376 | def testListIssueComments_Normal(self): |
| 4377 | """We can list comments for an issue.""" |
| 4378 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4379 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4380 | comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4381 | project_id=789, content='more info', user_id=111, |
| 4382 | issue_id=issue.issue_id) |
| 4383 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment, 1) |
| 4384 | |
| 4385 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4386 | actual_comments = we.ListIssueComments(issue) |
| 4387 | |
| 4388 | self.assertEqual(2, len(actual_comments)) |
| 4389 | self.assertEqual('sum', actual_comments[0].content) |
| 4390 | self.assertEqual('more info', actual_comments[1].content) |
| 4391 | |
| 4392 | def _Comment(self, issue, content, local_id, approval_id=None): |
| 4393 | """Adds a comment to issue with reasonable defaults.""" |
| 4394 | comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4395 | project_id=issue.project_id, |
| 4396 | content=content, |
| 4397 | user_id=issue.reporter_id, |
| 4398 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, |
| 4399 | approval_id=approval_id) |
| 4400 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment, local_id) |
| 4401 | |
| 4402 | def testSafeListIssueComments_Normal(self): |
| 4403 | initial_description = 'sum' |
| 4404 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4405 | self.project.project_id, |
| 4406 | 1, |
| 4407 | initial_description, |
| 4408 | 'New', |
| 4409 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4410 | issue_id=78901, |
| 4411 | project_name=self.project.project_name) |
| 4412 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4413 | self._Comment(issue, 'more info', 1) |
| 4414 | |
| 4415 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4416 | list_result = we.SafeListIssueComments(issue.issue_id, 1000, 0) |
| 4417 | |
| 4418 | self.assertEqual(None, list_result.next_start) |
| 4419 | actual_comments = list_result.items |
| 4420 | self.assertEqual(2, len(actual_comments)) |
| 4421 | self.assertEqual(initial_description, actual_comments[0].content) |
| 4422 | self.assertEqual('more info', actual_comments[1].content) |
| 4423 | |
| 4424 | |
| 4425 | def testSafeListIssueComments_DeletedIssue(self): |
| 4426 | """Users without permissions cannot view comments on deleted issues.""" |
| 4427 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4428 | self.project.project_id, |
| 4429 | 1, |
| 4430 | 'sum', |
| 4431 | 'New', |
| 4432 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4433 | issue_id=78901, |
| 4434 | project_name=self.project.project_name) |
| 4435 | issue.deleted = True |
| 4436 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4437 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4438 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4439 | we.SafeListIssueComments(issue.issue_id, 1000, 0) |
| 4440 | |
| 4441 | def testSafeListIssueComments_NotAllowed(self): |
| 4442 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4443 | self.project.project_id, |
| 4444 | 1, |
| 4445 | 'sum', |
| 4446 | 'New', |
| 4447 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4448 | issue_id=78901, |
| 4449 | project_name=self.project.project_name, |
| 4450 | labels=['Restrict-View-CoreTeam']) |
| 4451 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4452 | |
| 4453 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4454 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4455 | we.SafeListIssueComments(issue.issue_id, 1000, 0) |
| 4456 | |
| 4457 | def testSafeListIssueComments_UserFlagged(self): |
| 4458 | """Users see comments they flagged as spam.""" |
| 4459 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4460 | self.project.project_id, |
| 4461 | 1, |
| 4462 | 'sum', |
| 4463 | 'New', |
| 4464 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4465 | issue_id=78901, |
| 4466 | project_name=self.project.project_name) |
| 4467 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4468 | flagged_comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4469 | project_id=self.project.project_id, |
| 4470 | content='flagged content', |
| 4471 | user_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4472 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, |
| 4473 | inbound_message='Some message', |
| 4474 | importer_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 4475 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(flagged_comment, 1) |
| 4476 | |
| 4477 | self.services.spam.FlagComment( |
| 4478 | self.cnxn, issue, flagged_comment.id, flagged_comment.user_id, |
| 4479 | self.user_2.user_id, True) |
| 4480 | |
| 4481 | # One user flagging a comment doesn't cause other users to see it as spam. |
| 4482 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4483 | list_result = we.SafeListIssueComments(issue.issue_id, 1000, 0) |
| 4484 | self.assertFalse(list_result.items[1].is_spam) |
| 4485 | |
| 4486 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 4487 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4488 | list_result = we.SafeListIssueComments(issue.issue_id, 1000, 0) |
| 4489 | self.assertTrue(list_result.items[1].is_spam) |
| 4490 | self.assertEqual('flagged content', list_result.items[1].content) |
| 4491 | |
| 4492 | def testSafeListIssueComments_FilteredContent(self): |
| 4493 | |
| 4494 | def AssertFiltered(comment, filtered_comment): |
| 4495 | # Unfiltered |
| 4496 | self.assertEqual(comment.id, filtered_comment.id) |
| 4497 | self.assertEqual(comment.issue_id, filtered_comment.issue_id) |
| 4498 | self.assertEqual(comment.project_id, filtered_comment.project_id) |
| 4499 | self.assertEqual(comment.approval_id, filtered_comment.approval_id) |
| 4500 | self.assertEqual(comment.timestamp, filtered_comment.timestamp) |
| 4501 | self.assertEqual(comment.deleted_by, filtered_comment.deleted_by) |
| 4502 | self.assertEqual(comment.sequence, filtered_comment.sequence) |
| 4503 | self.assertEqual(comment.is_spam, filtered_comment.is_spam) |
| 4504 | self.assertEqual(comment.is_description, filtered_comment.is_description) |
| 4505 | self.assertEqual( |
| 4506 | comment.description_num, filtered_comment.description_num) |
| 4507 | # Filtered. |
| 4508 | self.assertEqual(None, filtered_comment.content) |
| 4509 | self.assertEqual(0, filtered_comment.user_id) |
| 4510 | self.assertEqual([], filtered_comment.amendments) |
| 4511 | self.assertEqual([], filtered_comment.attachments) |
| 4512 | self.assertEqual(None, filtered_comment.inbound_message) |
| 4513 | self.assertEqual(0, filtered_comment.importer_id) |
| 4514 | |
| 4515 | initial_description = 'sum' |
| 4516 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4517 | self.project.project_id, |
| 4518 | 1, |
| 4519 | initial_description, |
| 4520 | 'New', |
| 4521 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4522 | issue_id=78901, |
| 4523 | project_name=self.project.project_name) |
| 4524 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4525 | spam_comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4526 | project_id=self.project.project_id, |
| 4527 | content='spam', |
| 4528 | user_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4529 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, |
| 4530 | is_spam=True, |
| 4531 | inbound_message='Some message', |
| 4532 | importer_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 4533 | deleted_comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4534 | project_id=self.project.project_id, |
| 4535 | content='deleted', |
| 4536 | user_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4537 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, |
| 4538 | deleted_by=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4539 | amendments=[ |
| 4540 | tracker_pb2.Amendment( |
| 4541 | field=tracker_pb2.FieldID.SUMMARY, newvalue='new') |
| 4542 | ], |
| 4543 | attachments=[ |
| 4544 | tracker_pb2.Attachment( |
| 4545 | attachment_id=1, |
| 4546 | mimetype='image/png', |
| 4547 | filename='example.png', |
| 4548 | filesize=12345) |
| 4549 | ]) |
| 4550 | inbound_comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4551 | project_id=self.project.project_id, |
| 4552 | content='from an inbound message', |
| 4553 | user_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4554 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, |
| 4555 | inbound_message='the full inbound message') |
| 4556 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(spam_comment, 1) |
| 4557 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(deleted_comment, 2) |
| 4558 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(inbound_comment, 3) |
| 4559 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4560 | list_result = we.SafeListIssueComments(issue.issue_id, 1000, 0) |
| 4561 | |
| 4562 | self.assertEqual(None, list_result.next_start) |
| 4563 | actual_comments = list_result.items |
| 4564 | self.assertEqual(4, len(actual_comments)) |
| 4565 | self.assertEqual(initial_description, actual_comments[0].content) |
| 4566 | AssertFiltered(spam_comment, actual_comments[1]) |
| 4567 | AssertFiltered(deleted_comment, actual_comments[2]) |
| 4568 | self.assertEqual('from an inbound message', actual_comments[3].content) |
| 4569 | self.assertEqual(None, actual_comments[3].inbound_message) |
| 4570 | |
| 4571 | def testSafeListIssueComments_AdminsViewUnfiltered(self): |
| 4572 | """Admins can appropriately view comment content that would be filtered.""" |
| 4573 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4574 | self.project.project_id, |
| 4575 | 1, |
| 4576 | 'sum', |
| 4577 | 'New', |
| 4578 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4579 | issue_id=78901, |
| 4580 | project_name=self.project.project_name) |
| 4581 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4582 | spam_comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4583 | project_id=self.project.project_id, |
| 4584 | content='spam', |
| 4585 | user_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4586 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, |
| 4587 | is_spam=True, |
| 4588 | inbound_message='Some message', |
| 4589 | importer_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 4590 | deleted_comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4591 | project_id=self.project.project_id, |
| 4592 | content='deleted', |
| 4593 | user_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4594 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, |
| 4595 | deleted_by=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4596 | amendments=[ |
| 4597 | tracker_pb2.Amendment( |
| 4598 | field=tracker_pb2.FieldID.SUMMARY, newvalue='new') |
| 4599 | ], |
| 4600 | attachments=[ |
| 4601 | tracker_pb2.Attachment( |
| 4602 | attachment_id=1, |
| 4603 | mimetype='image/png', |
| 4604 | filename='example.png', |
| 4605 | filesize=12345) |
| 4606 | ]) |
| 4607 | inbound_comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4608 | project_id=self.project.project_id, |
| 4609 | content='from an inbound message', |
| 4610 | user_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4611 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, |
| 4612 | inbound_message='the full inbound message') |
| 4613 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(spam_comment, 1) |
| 4614 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(deleted_comment, 2) |
| 4615 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(inbound_comment, 3) |
| 4616 | |
| 4617 | self.SignIn(self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 4618 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4619 | list_result = we.SafeListIssueComments(issue.issue_id, 1000, 0) |
| 4620 | |
| 4621 | # Admins can view the fields of comments that would be filtered. |
| 4622 | actual_comments = list_result.items |
| 4623 | self.assertEqual(spam_comment.content, actual_comments[1].content) |
| 4624 | self.assertEqual(deleted_comment.content, actual_comments[2].content) |
| 4625 | self.assertEqual( |
| 4626 | 'the full inbound message', actual_comments[3].inbound_message) |
| 4627 | |
| 4628 | def testSafeListIssueComments_MoreItems(self): |
| 4629 | initial_description = 'sum' |
| 4630 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4631 | self.project.project_id, |
| 4632 | 1, |
| 4633 | initial_description, |
| 4634 | 'New', |
| 4635 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4636 | issue_id=78901, |
| 4637 | project_name=self.project.project_name) |
| 4638 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4639 | self._Comment(issue, 'more info', 1) |
| 4640 | |
| 4641 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4642 | list_result = we.SafeListIssueComments(issue.issue_id, 1, 0) |
| 4643 | |
| 4644 | self.assertEqual(1, list_result.next_start) |
| 4645 | actual_comments = list_result.items |
| 4646 | self.assertEqual(1, len(actual_comments)) |
| 4647 | self.assertEqual(initial_description, actual_comments[0].content) |
| 4648 | |
| 4649 | def testSafeListIssueComments_Start(self): |
| 4650 | initial_description = 'sum' |
| 4651 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4652 | self.project.project_id, |
| 4653 | 1, |
| 4654 | initial_description, |
| 4655 | 'New', |
| 4656 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4657 | issue_id=78901, |
| 4658 | project_name=self.project.project_name) |
| 4659 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4660 | self._Comment(issue, 'more info', 1) |
| 4661 | |
| 4662 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4663 | list_result = we.SafeListIssueComments(issue.issue_id, 1000, 1) |
| 4664 | self.assertEqual(None, list_result.next_start) |
| 4665 | actual_comments = list_result.items |
| 4666 | self.assertEqual(1, len(actual_comments)) |
| 4667 | self.assertEqual('more info', actual_comments[0].content) |
| 4668 | |
| 4669 | def testSafeListIssueComments_ApprovalId(self): |
| 4670 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4671 | self.project.project_id, |
| 4672 | 1, |
| 4673 | 'initial description', |
| 4674 | 'New', |
| 4675 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4676 | issue_id=78901, |
| 4677 | project_name=self.project.project_name) |
| 4678 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4679 | |
| 4680 | max_items = 2 |
| 4681 | # Create comments for testing. |
| 4682 | self._Comment(issue, 'more info', 1) |
| 4683 | self._Comment(issue, 'approval2 info', 2, approval_id=2) |
| 4684 | # This would be after the max_items of 2, so we are ensuring that the |
| 4685 | # max_items limit applies AFTER filtering rather than before. |
| 4686 | self._Comment(issue, 'approval1 info1', 3, approval_id=1) |
| 4687 | self._Comment(issue, 'approval1 info2', 4, approval_id=1) |
| 4688 | self._Comment(issue, 'approval1 info3', 5, approval_id=1) |
| 4689 | |
| 4690 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4691 | list_result = we.SafeListIssueComments( |
| 4692 | issue.issue_id, max_items, 0, approval_id=1) |
| 4693 | self.assertEqual( |
| 4694 | 2, list_result.next_start, 'We have a third approval comment') |
| 4695 | actual_comments = list_result.items |
| 4696 | self.assertEqual(2, len(actual_comments)) |
| 4697 | self.assertEqual('approval1 info1', actual_comments[0].content) |
| 4698 | self.assertEqual('approval1 info2', actual_comments[1].content) |
| 4699 | |
| 4700 | def testSafeListIssueComments_StartAndApprovalId(self): |
| 4701 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 4702 | self.project.project_id, |
| 4703 | 1, |
| 4704 | 'initial description', |
| 4705 | 'New', |
| 4706 | self.user_1.user_id, |
| 4707 | issue_id=78901, |
| 4708 | project_name=self.project.project_name) |
| 4709 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4710 | |
| 4711 | # Create comments for testing. |
| 4712 | self._Comment(issue, 'more info', 1) |
| 4713 | self._Comment(issue, 'approval2 info', 2, approval_id=2) |
| 4714 | self._Comment(issue, 'approval1 info1', 3, approval_id=1) |
| 4715 | self._Comment(issue, 'approval1 info2', 4, approval_id=1) |
| 4716 | self._Comment(issue, 'approval1 info3', 5, approval_id=1) |
| 4717 | |
| 4718 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4719 | list_result = we.SafeListIssueComments( |
| 4720 | issue.issue_id, 1000, 1, approval_id=1) |
| 4721 | self.assertEqual(None, list_result.next_start) |
| 4722 | actual_comments = list_result.items |
| 4723 | self.assertEqual(2, len(actual_comments)) |
| 4724 | self.assertEqual('approval1 info2', actual_comments[0].content) |
| 4725 | self.assertEqual('approval1 info3', actual_comments[1].content) |
| 4726 | |
| 4727 | # FUTURE: UpdateComment() |
| 4728 | |
| 4729 | def testDeleteComment_Normal(self): |
| 4730 | """We can mark and unmark a comment as deleted.""" |
| 4731 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4732 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4733 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4734 | comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4735 | project_id=789, content='soon to be deleted', user_id=111, |
| 4736 | issue_id=issue.issue_id) |
| 4737 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment, 1) |
| 4738 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4739 | we.DeleteComment(issue, comment, True) |
| 4740 | self.assertEqual(111, comment.deleted_by) |
| 4741 | we.DeleteComment(issue, comment, False) |
| 4742 | self.assertEqual(None, comment.deleted_by) |
| 4743 | |
| 4744 | @mock.patch('services.issue_svc.IssueService.SoftDeleteComment') |
| 4745 | def testDeleteComment_UndeleteableSpam(self, mockSoftDeleteComment): |
| 4746 | """Throws exception when comment is spam and owner is deleting.""" |
| 4747 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4748 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4749 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4750 | comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4751 | project_id=789, content='soon to be deleted', user_id=111, |
| 4752 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, is_spam=True) |
| 4753 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment, 1) |
| 4754 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4755 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4756 | we.DeleteComment(issue, comment, True) |
| 4757 | self.assertEqual(None, comment.deleted_by) |
| 4758 | mockSoftDeleteComment.assert_not_called() |
| 4759 | |
| 4760 | @mock.patch('services.issue_svc.IssueService.SoftDeleteComment') |
| 4761 | @mock.patch('framework.permissions.CanDeleteComment') |
| 4762 | def testDeleteComment_UndeletablePermissions(self, mockCanDelete, |
| 4763 | mockSoftDeleteComment): |
| 4764 | """Throws exception when deleter doesn't have permission to do so.""" |
| 4765 | mockCanDelete.return_value = False |
| 4766 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4767 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4768 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4769 | comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4770 | project_id=789, content='soon to be deleted', user_id=111, |
| 4771 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, is_spam=True) |
| 4772 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment, 1) |
| 4773 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4774 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4775 | we.DeleteComment(issue, comment, True) |
| 4776 | self.assertEqual(None, comment.deleted_by) |
| 4777 | mockSoftDeleteComment.assert_not_called() |
| 4778 | |
| 4779 | def testDeleteAttachment_Normal(self): |
| 4780 | """We can mark and unmark a comment attachment as deleted.""" |
| 4781 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4782 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4783 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4784 | comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4785 | project_id=789, content='soon to be deleted', user_id=111, |
| 4786 | issue_id=issue.issue_id) |
| 4787 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment, 1) |
| 4788 | attachment = tracker_pb2.Attachment() |
| 4789 | self.services.issue.TestAddAttachment(attachment, comment.id, 1) |
| 4790 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4791 | we.DeleteAttachment( |
| 4792 | issue, comment, attachment.attachment_id, True) |
| 4793 | self.assertTrue(attachment.deleted) |
| 4794 | we.DeleteAttachment( |
| 4795 | issue, comment, attachment.attachment_id, False) |
| 4796 | self.assertFalse(attachment.deleted) |
| 4797 | |
| 4798 | @mock.patch('services.issue_svc.IssueService.SoftDeleteComment') |
| 4799 | @mock.patch('framework.permissions.CanDeleteComment') |
| 4800 | def testDeleteAttachment_UndeletablePermissions( |
| 4801 | self, mockCanDelete, mockSoftDeleteComment): |
| 4802 | """Throws exception when deleter doesn't have permission to do so.""" |
| 4803 | mockCanDelete.return_value = False |
| 4804 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4805 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4806 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4807 | comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4808 | project_id=789, content='soon to be deleted', user_id=111, |
| 4809 | issue_id=issue.issue_id, is_spam=True) |
| 4810 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment, 1) |
| 4811 | attachment = tracker_pb2.Attachment() |
| 4812 | self.services.issue.TestAddAttachment(attachment, comment.id, 1) |
| 4813 | self.assertFalse(attachment.deleted) |
| 4814 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4815 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4816 | we.DeleteAttachment( |
| 4817 | issue, comment, attachment.attachment_id, True) |
| 4818 | self.assertFalse(attachment.deleted) |
| 4819 | mockSoftDeleteComment.assert_not_called() |
| 4820 | |
| 4821 | def testFlagComment_Normal(self): |
| 4822 | """We can mark and unmark a comment as spam.""" |
| 4823 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4824 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4825 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4826 | comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4827 | project_id=789, content='soon to be deleted', user_id=111, |
| 4828 | issue_id=issue.issue_id) |
| 4829 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment, 1) |
| 4830 | |
| 4831 | comment_reports = self.services.spam.comment_reports_by_issue_id |
| 4832 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4833 | we.FlagComment(issue, comment, True) |
| 4834 | self.assertEqual([111], comment_reports[issue.issue_id][comment.id]) |
| 4835 | we.FlagComment(issue, comment, False) |
| 4836 | self.assertEqual([], comment_reports[issue.issue_id][comment.id]) |
| 4837 | |
| 4838 | def testFlagComment_AutoVerdict(self): |
| 4839 | """Admins can mark and unmark a comment as spam, and it is a verdict.""" |
| 4840 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 4841 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4842 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4843 | comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4844 | project_id=789, content='soon to be deleted', user_id=111, |
| 4845 | issue_id=issue.issue_id) |
| 4846 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment, 1) |
| 4847 | |
| 4848 | comment_reports = self.services.spam.comment_reports_by_issue_id |
| 4849 | manual_verdicts = self.services.spam.manual_verdicts_by_comment_id |
| 4850 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4851 | we.FlagComment(issue, comment, True) |
| 4852 | self.assertEqual([444], comment_reports[issue.issue_id][comment.id]) |
| 4853 | self.assertTrue(manual_verdicts[comment.id][444]) |
| 4854 | we.FlagComment(issue, comment, False) |
| 4855 | self.assertEqual([], comment_reports[issue.issue_id][comment.id]) |
| 4856 | self.assertFalse(manual_verdicts[comment.id][444]) |
| 4857 | |
| 4858 | def testFlagComment_NotAllowed(self): |
| 4859 | """Anons can't mark comment as spam.""" |
| 4860 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4861 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4862 | comment = tracker_pb2.IssueComment( |
| 4863 | project_id=789, content='soon to be deleted', user_id=111, |
| 4864 | issue_id=issue.issue_id) |
| 4865 | self.services.issue.TestAddComment(comment, 1) |
| 4866 | |
| 4867 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4868 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4869 | we.FlagComment(issue, comment, True) |
| 4870 | |
| 4871 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4872 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4873 | we.FlagComment(issue, comment, False) |
| 4874 | |
| 4875 | def testStarIssue_Normal(self): |
| 4876 | """We can star and unstar issues.""" |
| 4877 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4878 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4879 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4880 | |
| 4881 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4882 | updated_issue = we.StarIssue(issue, True) |
| 4883 | self.assertEqual(1, updated_issue.star_count) |
| 4884 | updated_issue = we.StarIssue(issue, False) |
| 4885 | self.assertEqual(0, updated_issue.star_count) |
| 4886 | |
| 4887 | def testStarIssue_Anon(self): |
| 4888 | """A signed out user cannot star or unstar issues.""" |
| 4889 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4890 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4891 | # Don't sign in. |
| 4892 | |
| 4893 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 4894 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4895 | we.StarIssue(issue, True) |
| 4896 | |
| 4897 | def testIsIssueStarred_Normal(self): |
| 4898 | """We can check if the current user starred an issue or not.""" |
| 4899 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4900 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4901 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4902 | |
| 4903 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4904 | self.assertFalse(we.IsIssueStarred(issue)) |
| 4905 | we.StarIssue(issue, True) |
| 4906 | self.assertTrue(we.IsIssueStarred(issue)) |
| 4907 | we.StarIssue(issue, False) |
| 4908 | self.assertFalse(we.IsIssueStarred(issue)) |
| 4909 | |
| 4910 | def testIsIssueStarred_Anon(self): |
| 4911 | """A signed out user has never starred anything.""" |
| 4912 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4913 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 4914 | # Don't sign in. |
| 4915 | |
| 4916 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4917 | self.assertFalse(we.IsIssueStarred(issue)) |
| 4918 | |
| 4919 | def testListStarredIssueIDs_Anon(self): |
| 4920 | """A signed out users has no starred issues.""" |
| 4921 | # Don't sign in. |
| 4922 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4923 | self.assertEqual([], we.ListStarredIssueIDs()) |
| 4924 | |
| 4925 | def testListStarredIssueIDs_Normal(self): |
| 4926 | """We can get the list of issues starred by a user.""" |
| 4927 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 4928 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 4929 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'sum2', 'New', 111, issue_id=78902) |
| 4930 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 4931 | |
| 4932 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 4933 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4934 | # User has not starred anything yet. |
| 4935 | self.assertEqual([], we.ListStarredIssueIDs()) |
| 4936 | |
| 4937 | # Now, star a couple of issues. |
| 4938 | we.StarIssue(issue1, True) |
| 4939 | we.StarIssue(issue2, True) |
| 4940 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 4941 | [issue1.issue_id, issue2.issue_id], |
| 4942 | we.ListStarredIssueIDs()) |
| 4943 | |
| 4944 | # Check that there is no cross-talk between users. |
| 4945 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 4946 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4947 | # User has not starred anything yet. |
| 4948 | self.assertEqual([], we.ListStarredIssueIDs()) |
| 4949 | |
| 4950 | # Now, star an issue as that other user. |
| 4951 | we.StarIssue(issue1, True) |
| 4952 | self.assertEqual([issue1.issue_id], we.ListStarredIssueIDs()) |
| 4953 | |
| 4954 | def testGetUser(self): |
| 4955 | """We return the User PB for the given existing user id.""" |
| 4956 | expected = self.services.user.TestAddUser('test5@example.com', 555) |
| 4957 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4958 | actual = we.GetUser(555) |
| 4959 | self.assertEqual(expected, actual) |
| 4960 | |
| 4961 | def testBatchGetUsers(self): |
| 4962 | """We return the User PBs for all given user ids.""" |
| 4963 | actual = self.work_env.BatchGetUsers( |
| 4964 | [self.user_1.user_id, self.user_2.user_id]) |
| 4965 | self.assertEqual(actual, [self.user_1, self.user_2]) |
| 4966 | |
| 4967 | def testBatchGetUsers_NoUserFound(self): |
| 4968 | """We raise an exception if a User is not found.""" |
| 4969 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchUserException): |
| 4970 | self.work_env.BatchGetUsers( |
| 4971 | [self.user_1.user_id, self.user_2.user_id, 404]) |
| 4972 | |
| 4973 | def testGetUser_DoesntExist(self): |
| 4974 | """We reject attempts to get an user that doesn't exist.""" |
| 4975 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchUserException): |
| 4976 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4977 | we.GetUser(555) |
| 4978 | |
| 4979 | def setUpUserGroups(self): |
| 4980 | self.services.user.TestAddUser('test5@example.com', 555) |
| 4981 | self.services.user.TestAddUser('test6@example.com', 666) |
| 4982 | public_group_id = self.services.usergroup.CreateGroup( |
| 4983 | self.cnxn, self.services, 'group1@test.com', 'anyone') |
| 4984 | private_group_id = self.services.usergroup.CreateGroup( |
| 4985 | self.cnxn, self.services, 'group2@test.com', 'owners') |
| 4986 | self.services.usergroup.UpdateMembers( |
| 4987 | self.cnxn, public_group_id, [111], 'member') |
| 4988 | self.services.usergroup.UpdateMembers( |
| 4989 | self.cnxn, private_group_id, [555, 111], 'owner') |
| 4990 | return public_group_id, private_group_id |
| 4991 | |
| 4992 | def testGetMemberships_Anon(self): |
| 4993 | """We return groups the user is in and that are visible to the requester.""" |
| 4994 | public_group_id, _ = self.setUpUserGroups() |
| 4995 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 4996 | self.assertEqual(we.GetMemberships(111), [public_group_id]) |
| 4997 | |
| 4998 | def testGetMemberships_UserHasPerm(self): |
| 4999 | public_group_id, private_group_id = self.setUpUserGroups() |
| 5000 | self.SignIn(user_id=555) |
| 5001 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5002 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5003 | we.GetMemberships(111), [public_group_id, private_group_id]) |
| 5004 | |
| 5005 | def testGetMemeberships_UserHasNoPerm(self): |
| 5006 | public_group_id, _ = self.setUpUserGroups() |
| 5007 | self.SignIn(user_id=666) |
| 5008 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5009 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5010 | we.GetMemberships(111), [public_group_id]) |
| 5011 | |
| 5012 | def testGetMemeberships_GetOwnMembership(self): |
| 5013 | public_group_id, private_group_id = self.setUpUserGroups() |
| 5014 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 5015 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5016 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5017 | we.GetMemberships(111), [public_group_id, private_group_id]) |
| 5018 | |
| 5019 | def testListReferencedUsers(self): |
| 5020 | """We return the list of User PBs for the given existing user emails.""" |
| 5021 | user5 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('test5@example.com', 555) |
| 5022 | user6 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('test6@example.com', 666) |
| 5023 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5024 | # We ignore emails that are empty or belong to non-existent users. |
| 5025 | users, linked_user_ids = we.ListReferencedUsers( |
| 5026 | ['test4@example.com', 'test5@example.com', 'test6@example.com', '']) |
| 5027 | self.assertItemsEqual(users, [user5, user6]) |
| 5028 | self.assertEqual(linked_user_ids, []) |
| 5029 | |
| 5030 | def testListReferencedUsers_Linked(self): |
| 5031 | """We return User PBs and the IDs of any linked accounts.""" |
| 5032 | user5 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('test5@example.com', 555) |
| 5033 | user5.linked_child_ids = [666, 777] |
| 5034 | user6 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('test6@example.com', 666) |
| 5035 | user6.linked_parent_id = 555 |
| 5036 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5037 | # We ignore emails that are empty or belong to non-existent users. |
| 5038 | users, linked_user_ids = we.ListReferencedUsers( |
| 5039 | ['test4@example.com', 'test5@example.com', 'test6@example.com', '']) |
| 5040 | self.assertItemsEqual(users, [user5, user6]) |
| 5041 | self.assertItemsEqual(linked_user_ids, [555, 666, 777]) |
| 5042 | |
| 5043 | def testStarUser_Normal(self): |
| 5044 | """We can star and unstar a user.""" |
| 5045 | self.SignIn() |
| 5046 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5047 | self.assertFalse(we.IsUserStarred(111)) |
| 5048 | we.StarUser(111, True) |
| 5049 | self.assertTrue(we.IsUserStarred(111)) |
| 5050 | we.StarUser(111, False) |
| 5051 | self.assertFalse(we.IsUserStarred(111)) |
| 5052 | |
| 5053 | def testStarUser_NoSuchUser(self): |
| 5054 | """We can't star a nonexistent user.""" |
| 5055 | self.SignIn() |
| 5056 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchUserException): |
| 5057 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5058 | we.StarUser(999, True) |
| 5059 | |
| 5060 | def testStarUser_Anon(self): |
| 5061 | """Anon user can't star a user.""" |
| 5062 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5063 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5064 | we.StarUser(111, True) |
| 5065 | |
| 5066 | def testIsUserStarred_Normal(self): |
| 5067 | """We can check if a user is starred.""" |
| 5068 | # Tested by method testStarUser_Normal(). |
| 5069 | pass |
| 5070 | |
| 5071 | def testIsUserStarred_NoUserSpecified(self): |
| 5072 | """A user ID must be specified.""" |
| 5073 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5074 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5075 | self.assertFalse(we.IsUserStarred(None)) |
| 5076 | |
| 5077 | def testIsUserStarred_NoSuchUser(self): |
| 5078 | """We can't check for stars on a nonexistent user.""" |
| 5079 | self.SignIn() |
| 5080 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchUserException): |
| 5081 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5082 | we.IsUserStarred(999) |
| 5083 | |
| 5084 | def testGetUserStarCount_Normal(self): |
| 5085 | """We can count the stars of a user.""" |
| 5086 | self.SignIn() |
| 5087 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5088 | self.assertEqual(0, we.GetUserStarCount(111)) |
| 5089 | we.StarUser(111, True) |
| 5090 | self.assertEqual(1, we.GetUserStarCount(111)) |
| 5091 | |
| 5092 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 5093 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5094 | we.StarUser(111, True) |
| 5095 | self.assertEqual(2, we.GetUserStarCount(111)) |
| 5096 | we.StarUser(111, False) |
| 5097 | self.assertEqual(1, we.GetUserStarCount(111)) |
| 5098 | |
| 5099 | def testGetUserStarCount_NoSuchUser(self): |
| 5100 | """We can't count stars of a nonexistent user.""" |
| 5101 | self.SignIn() |
| 5102 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchUserException): |
| 5103 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5104 | we.GetUserStarCount(111111) |
| 5105 | |
| 5106 | def testGetUserStarCount_NoUserSpecified(self): |
| 5107 | """A user ID must be specified.""" |
| 5108 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5109 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5110 | self.assertFalse(we.GetUserStarCount(None)) |
| 5111 | |
| 5112 | def testGetPendingLinkInvites_Anon(self): |
| 5113 | """Anon never had pending linkage invites.""" |
| 5114 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5115 | as_parent, as_child = we.GetPendingLinkedInvites() |
| 5116 | self.assertEqual([], as_parent) |
| 5117 | self.assertEqual([], as_child) |
| 5118 | |
| 5119 | def testGetPendingLinkInvites_None(self): |
| 5120 | """When an account has no invites, we see empty lists.""" |
| 5121 | self.SignIn() |
| 5122 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5123 | as_parent, as_child = we.GetPendingLinkedInvites() |
| 5124 | self.assertEqual([], as_parent) |
| 5125 | self.assertEqual([], as_child) |
| 5126 | |
| 5127 | def testGetPendingLinkInvites_Some(self): |
| 5128 | """If there are any pending invites for the current user, we get them.""" |
| 5129 | self.SignIn() |
| 5130 | self.services.user.invite_rows = [(111, 222), (333, 444), (555, 111)] |
| 5131 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5132 | as_parent, as_child = we.GetPendingLinkedInvites() |
| 5133 | self.assertEqual([222], as_parent) |
| 5134 | self.assertEqual([555], as_child) |
| 5135 | |
| 5136 | def testInviteLinkedParent_MissingParent(self): |
| 5137 | """Invited parent must be specified by email.""" |
| 5138 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5139 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5140 | we.InviteLinkedParent('') |
| 5141 | |
| 5142 | def testInviteLinkedParent_Anon(self): |
| 5143 | """Anon cannot invite anyone to link accounts.""" |
| 5144 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5145 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 5146 | we.InviteLinkedParent('x@example.com') |
| 5147 | |
| 5148 | def testInviteLinkedParent_NotAMatch(self): |
| 5149 | """We only allow linkage invites when usernames match.""" |
| 5150 | self.SignIn() |
| 5151 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5152 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException) as cm: |
| 5153 | we.InviteLinkedParent('x@example.com') |
| 5154 | self.assertEqual('Linked account names must match', cm.exception.message) |
| 5155 | |
| 5156 | @mock.patch('settings.linkable_domains', {'example.com': ['other.com']}) |
| 5157 | def testInviteLinkedParent_BadDomain(self): |
| 5158 | """We only allow linkage invites between allowlisted domains.""" |
| 5159 | self.SignIn() |
| 5160 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5161 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException) as cm: |
| 5162 | we.InviteLinkedParent('user_111@hacker.com') |
| 5163 | self.assertEqual( |
| 5164 | 'Linked account unsupported domain', cm.exception.message) |
| 5165 | |
| 5166 | @mock.patch('settings.linkable_domains', {'example.com': ['other.com']}) |
| 5167 | def testInviteLinkedParent_NoSuchParent(self): |
| 5168 | """Verify that the parent account already exists.""" |
| 5169 | self.SignIn() |
| 5170 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5171 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchUserException): |
| 5172 | we.InviteLinkedParent('user_111@other.com') |
| 5173 | |
| 5174 | @mock.patch('settings.linkable_domains', {'example.com': ['other.com']}) |
| 5175 | def testInviteLinkedParent_Normal(self): |
| 5176 | """A child account can invite a matching parent account to link.""" |
| 5177 | self.services.user.TestAddUser('user_111@other.com', 555) |
| 5178 | self.SignIn() |
| 5179 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5180 | we.InviteLinkedParent('user_111@other.com') |
| 5181 | self.assertEqual( |
| 5182 | [(555, 111)], self.services.user.invite_rows) |
| 5183 | |
| 5184 | def testAcceptLinkedChild_NoInvite(self): |
| 5185 | """A parent account can only accept an exiting invite.""" |
| 5186 | self.SignIn() |
| 5187 | self.services.user.invite_rows = [(111, 222)] |
| 5188 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5189 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5190 | we.AcceptLinkedChild(333) |
| 5191 | |
| 5192 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 5193 | self.services.user.invite_rows = [(111, 333)] |
| 5194 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5195 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5196 | we.AcceptLinkedChild(333) |
| 5197 | |
| 5198 | def testAcceptLinkedChild_Normal(self): |
| 5199 | """A parent account can accept an invite from a child.""" |
| 5200 | self.SignIn() |
| 5201 | self.services.user.invite_rows = [(111, 222)] |
| 5202 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5203 | we.AcceptLinkedChild(222) |
| 5204 | self.assertEqual( |
| 5205 | [(111, 222)], self.services.user.linked_account_rows) |
| 5206 | self.assertEqual( |
| 5207 | [], self.services.user.invite_rows) |
| 5208 | |
| 5209 | def testUnlinkAccounts_NotAllowed(self): |
| 5210 | """Reject attempts to unlink someone else's accounts.""" |
| 5211 | self.SignIn(user_id=333) |
| 5212 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5213 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 5214 | we.UnlinkAccounts(111, 222) |
| 5215 | |
| 5216 | def testUnlinkAccounts_AdminIsAllowed(self): |
| 5217 | """Site admins may unlink someone else's accounts.""" |
| 5218 | self.SignIn(user_id=444) |
| 5219 | self.services.user.linked_account_rows = [(111, 222)] |
| 5220 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5221 | we.UnlinkAccounts(111, 222) |
| 5222 | self.assertNotIn((111, 222), self.services.user.linked_account_rows) |
| 5223 | |
| 5224 | def testUnlinkAccounts_Normal(self): |
| 5225 | """A parent or child can unlink their linked account.""" |
| 5226 | self.SignIn(user_id=111) |
| 5227 | self.services.user.linked_account_rows = [(111, 222), (333, 444)] |
| 5228 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5229 | we.UnlinkAccounts(111, 222) |
| 5230 | self.assertEqual([(333, 444)], self.services.user.linked_account_rows) |
| 5231 | |
| 5232 | self.SignIn(user_id=222) |
| 5233 | self.services.user.linked_account_rows = [(111, 222), (333, 444)] |
| 5234 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5235 | we.UnlinkAccounts(111, 222) |
| 5236 | self.assertEqual([(333, 444)], self.services.user.linked_account_rows) |
| 5237 | |
| 5238 | def testUpdateUserSettings(self): |
| 5239 | """We can update the settings of the logged in user.""" |
| 5240 | self.SignIn() |
| 5241 | user = self.services.user.GetUser(self.cnxn, 111) |
| 5242 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5243 | we.UpdateUserSettings( |
| 5244 | user, |
| 5245 | obscure_email=True, |
| 5246 | keep_people_perms_open=True) |
| 5247 | |
| 5248 | self.assertTrue(user.obscure_email) |
| 5249 | self.assertTrue(user.keep_people_perms_open) |
| 5250 | |
| 5251 | def testUpdateUserSettings_Anon(self): |
| 5252 | """A user must be logged in.""" |
| 5253 | anon = self.services.user.GetUser(self.cnxn, 0) |
| 5254 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5255 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5256 | we.UpdateUserSettings(anon, keep_people_perms_open=True) |
| 5257 | |
| 5258 | def testGetUserPrefs_Anon(self): |
| 5259 | """Anon always has empty prefs.""" |
| 5260 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5261 | userprefs = we.GetUserPrefs(0) |
| 5262 | |
| 5263 | self.assertEqual(0, userprefs.user_id) |
| 5264 | self.assertEqual([], userprefs.prefs) |
| 5265 | |
| 5266 | def testGetUserPrefs_Mine_Empty(self): |
| 5267 | """User who never set any pref gets empty prefs.""" |
| 5268 | self.SignIn() |
| 5269 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5270 | userprefs = we.GetUserPrefs(111) |
| 5271 | |
| 5272 | self.assertEqual(111, userprefs.user_id) |
| 5273 | self.assertEqual([], userprefs.prefs) |
| 5274 | |
| 5275 | def testGetUserPrefs_Mine_Some(self): |
| 5276 | """User who set a pref gets it back.""" |
| 5277 | self.services.user.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5278 | self.cnxn, 111, |
| 5279 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='true')]) |
| 5280 | self.SignIn() |
| 5281 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5282 | userprefs = we.GetUserPrefs(111) |
| 5283 | |
| 5284 | self.assertEqual(111, userprefs.user_id) |
| 5285 | self.assertEqual(1, len(userprefs.prefs)) |
| 5286 | self.assertEqual('code_font', userprefs.prefs[0].name) |
| 5287 | self.assertEqual('true', userprefs.prefs[0].value) |
| 5288 | |
| 5289 | def testGetUserPrefs_Other_Allowed(self): |
| 5290 | """A site admin can read another user's prefs.""" |
| 5291 | self.services.user.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5292 | self.cnxn, 111, |
| 5293 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='true')]) |
| 5294 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 5295 | |
| 5296 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5297 | userprefs = we.GetUserPrefs(111) |
| 5298 | |
| 5299 | self.assertEqual(111, userprefs.user_id) |
| 5300 | self.assertEqual(1, len(userprefs.prefs)) |
| 5301 | self.assertEqual('code_font', userprefs.prefs[0].name) |
| 5302 | self.assertEqual('true', userprefs.prefs[0].value) |
| 5303 | |
| 5304 | def testGetUserPrefs_Other_Denied(self): |
| 5305 | """A non-admin cannot read another user's prefs.""" |
| 5306 | self.services.user.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5307 | self.cnxn, 111, |
| 5308 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='true')]) |
| 5309 | # user2 is not a site admin. |
| 5310 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 5311 | |
| 5312 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5313 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 5314 | we.GetUserPrefs(111) |
| 5315 | |
| 5316 | def _SetUpCorpUsers(self, user_ids): |
| 5317 | self.services.user.TestAddUser('corp_group@example.com', 888) |
| 5318 | self.services.usergroup.TestAddGroupSettings( |
| 5319 | 888, 'corp_group@example.com') |
| 5320 | self.services.usergroup.TestAddMembers(888, user_ids) |
| 5321 | |
| 5322 | # TODO(jrobbins): Update this with user group prefs when implemented. |
| 5323 | @mock.patch( |
| 5324 | 'settings.restrict_new_issues_user_groups', ['corp_group@example.com']) |
| 5325 | def testGetUserPrefs_Mine_RestrictNewIssues(self): |
| 5326 | """User who belongs to restrict_new_issues user group gets those prefs.""" |
| 5327 | self._SetUpCorpUsers([111, 222]) |
| 5328 | self.services.user.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5329 | self.cnxn, 111, |
| 5330 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='true')]) |
| 5331 | self.SignIn() |
| 5332 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5333 | userprefs = we.GetUserPrefs(111) |
| 5334 | |
| 5335 | self.assertEqual(111, userprefs.user_id) |
| 5336 | self.assertEqual(2, len(userprefs.prefs)) |
| 5337 | self.assertEqual('code_font', userprefs.prefs[0].name) |
| 5338 | self.assertEqual('true', userprefs.prefs[0].value) |
| 5339 | self.assertEqual('restrict_new_issues', userprefs.prefs[1].name) |
| 5340 | self.assertEqual('true', userprefs.prefs[1].value) |
| 5341 | |
| 5342 | @mock.patch( |
| 5343 | 'settings.restrict_new_issues_user_groups', ['corp_group@example.com']) |
| 5344 | def testGetUserPrefs_Mine_RestrictNewIssues_OptedOut(self): |
| 5345 | """If a restrict_new_issues user has opted out, use that pref value.""" |
| 5346 | self._SetUpCorpUsers([111, 222]) |
| 5347 | self.services.user.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5348 | self.cnxn, 111, |
| 5349 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='restrict_new_issues', value='false')]) |
| 5350 | self.SignIn() |
| 5351 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5352 | userprefs = we.GetUserPrefs(111) |
| 5353 | |
| 5354 | self.assertEqual(111, userprefs.user_id) |
| 5355 | self.assertEqual(1, len(userprefs.prefs)) |
| 5356 | self.assertEqual('restrict_new_issues', userprefs.prefs[0].name) |
| 5357 | self.assertEqual('false', userprefs.prefs[0].value) |
| 5358 | |
| 5359 | # TODO(jrobbins): Update this with user group prefs when implemented. |
| 5360 | @mock.patch( |
| 5361 | 'settings.public_issue_notice_user_groups', ['corp_group@example.com']) |
| 5362 | def testGetUserPrefs_Mine_PublicIssueNotice(self): |
| 5363 | """User who belongs to public_issue_notice user group gets those prefs.""" |
| 5364 | self._SetUpCorpUsers([111, 222]) |
| 5365 | self.services.user.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5366 | self.cnxn, 111, |
| 5367 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='true')]) |
| 5368 | self.SignIn() |
| 5369 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5370 | userprefs = we.GetUserPrefs(111) |
| 5371 | |
| 5372 | self.assertEqual(111, userprefs.user_id) |
| 5373 | self.assertEqual(2, len(userprefs.prefs)) |
| 5374 | self.assertEqual('code_font', userprefs.prefs[0].name) |
| 5375 | self.assertEqual('true', userprefs.prefs[0].value) |
| 5376 | self.assertEqual('public_issue_notice', userprefs.prefs[1].name) |
| 5377 | self.assertEqual('true', userprefs.prefs[1].value) |
| 5378 | |
| 5379 | @mock.patch( |
| 5380 | 'settings.public_issue_notice_user_groups', ['corp_group@example.com']) |
| 5381 | def testGetUserPrefs_Mine_PublicIssueNotice_OptedOut(self): |
| 5382 | """If a public_issue_notice user has opted out, use that pref value.""" |
| 5383 | self._SetUpCorpUsers([111, 222]) |
| 5384 | self.services.user.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5385 | self.cnxn, 111, |
| 5386 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='public_issue_notice', value='false')]) |
| 5387 | self.SignIn() |
| 5388 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5389 | userprefs = we.GetUserPrefs(111) |
| 5390 | |
| 5391 | self.assertEqual(111, userprefs.user_id) |
| 5392 | self.assertEqual(1, len(userprefs.prefs)) |
| 5393 | self.assertEqual('public_issue_notice', userprefs.prefs[0].name) |
| 5394 | self.assertEqual('false', userprefs.prefs[0].value) |
| 5395 | |
| 5396 | def testSetUserPrefs_Anon(self): |
| 5397 | """Anon cannot set prefs.""" |
| 5398 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5399 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5400 | we.SetUserPrefs(0, []) |
| 5401 | |
| 5402 | def testSetUserPrefs_Mine_Empty(self): |
| 5403 | """Setting zero prefs is a no-op..""" |
| 5404 | self.SignIn(111) |
| 5405 | |
| 5406 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5407 | we.SetUserPrefs(111, []) |
| 5408 | |
| 5409 | prefs_after = self.services.user.GetUserPrefs(self.cnxn, 111) |
| 5410 | self.assertEqual(0, len(prefs_after.prefs)) |
| 5411 | |
| 5412 | def testSetUserPrefs_Mine_Add(self): |
| 5413 | """User can set a preference for the first time.""" |
| 5414 | self.SignIn(111) |
| 5415 | |
| 5416 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5417 | we.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5418 | 111, |
| 5419 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='true')]) |
| 5420 | |
| 5421 | prefs_after = self.services.user.GetUserPrefs(self.cnxn, 111) |
| 5422 | self.assertEqual(1, len(prefs_after.prefs)) |
| 5423 | self.assertEqual('code_font', prefs_after.prefs[0].name) |
| 5424 | self.assertEqual('true', prefs_after.prefs[0].value) |
| 5425 | |
| 5426 | def testSetUserPrefs_Mine_Overwrite(self): |
| 5427 | """User can change the value of a pref.""" |
| 5428 | self.SignIn(111) |
| 5429 | self.services.user.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5430 | self.cnxn, 111, |
| 5431 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='true')]) |
| 5432 | |
| 5433 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5434 | we.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5435 | 111, |
| 5436 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='false')]) |
| 5437 | |
| 5438 | prefs_after = self.services.user.GetUserPrefs(self.cnxn, 111) |
| 5439 | self.assertEqual(1, len(prefs_after.prefs)) |
| 5440 | self.assertEqual('code_font', prefs_after.prefs[0].name) |
| 5441 | self.assertEqual('false', prefs_after.prefs[0].value) |
| 5442 | |
| 5443 | def testSetUserPrefs_Mine_Bad(self): |
| 5444 | """User cannot set a preference value that is not valid.""" |
| 5445 | self.SignIn(111) |
| 5446 | |
| 5447 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5448 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5449 | we.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5450 | 111, |
| 5451 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='sorta')]) |
| 5452 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5453 | we.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5454 | 111, |
| 5455 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='sign', value='gemini')]) |
| 5456 | |
| 5457 | # Regardless of exceptions, nothing was actually stored. |
| 5458 | prefs_after = self.services.user.GetUserPrefs(self.cnxn, 111) |
| 5459 | self.assertEqual(0, len(prefs_after.prefs)) |
| 5460 | |
| 5461 | def testSetUserPrefs_Other_Allowed(self): |
| 5462 | """A site admin can update another user's prefs.""" |
| 5463 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 5464 | self.services.user.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5465 | self.cnxn, 111, |
| 5466 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='true')]) |
| 5467 | |
| 5468 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5469 | we.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5470 | 111, |
| 5471 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='false')]) |
| 5472 | |
| 5473 | prefs_after = self.services.user.GetUserPrefs(self.cnxn, 111) |
| 5474 | self.assertEqual(1, len(prefs_after.prefs)) |
| 5475 | self.assertEqual('code_font', prefs_after.prefs[0].name) |
| 5476 | self.assertEqual('false', prefs_after.prefs[0].value) |
| 5477 | |
| 5478 | def testSetUserPrefs_Other_Denied(self): |
| 5479 | """A non-admin cannot set another user's prefs.""" |
| 5480 | # user2 is not a site admin. |
| 5481 | self.SignIn(222) |
| 5482 | self.services.user.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5483 | self.cnxn, 111, |
| 5484 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='true')]) |
| 5485 | |
| 5486 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5487 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 5488 | we.SetUserPrefs( |
| 5489 | 111, |
| 5490 | [user_pb2.UserPrefValue(name='code_font', value='false')]) |
| 5491 | |
| 5492 | # Regardless of any exception, the preferences remain unchanged. |
| 5493 | prefs_after = self.services.user.GetUserPrefs(self.cnxn, 111) |
| 5494 | self.assertEqual(1, len(prefs_after.prefs)) |
| 5495 | self.assertEqual('code_font', prefs_after.prefs[0].name) |
| 5496 | self.assertEqual('true', prefs_after.prefs[0].value) |
| 5497 | |
| 5498 | # FUTURE: GetUser() |
| 5499 | # FUTURE: UpdateUser() |
| 5500 | # FUTURE: DeleteUser() |
| 5501 | # FUTURE: ListStarredUsers() |
| 5502 | |
| 5503 | def testExpungeUsers_PermissionException(self): |
| 5504 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 5505 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5506 | we.ExpungeUsers([]) |
| 5507 | |
| 5508 | def testExpungeUsers_NoUsers(self): |
| 5509 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 5510 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 5511 | self.services.usergroup.group_dag = mock.Mock() |
| 5512 | |
| 5513 | self.mr.perms = permissions.ADMIN_PERMISSIONSET |
| 5514 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5515 | we.ExpungeUsers(['unknown@user.test']) |
| 5516 | |
| 5517 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit.assert_not_called() |
| 5518 | self.services.usergroup.group_dag.MarkObsolete.assert_not_called() |
| 5519 | |
| 5520 | def testExpungeUsers_ReservedUserID(self): |
| 5521 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 5522 | self.mr.cnxn.Commit = mock.Mock() |
| 5523 | self.services.usergroup.group_dag = mock.Mock() |
| 5524 | |
| 5525 | user_1 = self.services.user.TestAddUser( |
| 5526 | 'tainted-data@user.test', framework_constants.DELETED_USER_ID) |
| 5527 | |
| 5528 | self.mr.perms = permissions.ADMIN_PERMISSIONSET |
| 5529 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5530 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5531 | we.ExpungeUsers([user_1.email]) |
| 5532 | |
| 5533 | @mock.patch( |
| 5534 | 'features.send_notifications.' |
| 5535 | 'PrepareAndSendDeletedFilterRulesNotification') |
| 5536 | def testExpungeUsers_SkipPermissieons(self, _fake_pasdfrn): |
| 5537 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 5538 | self.services.usergroup.group_dag = mock.Mock() |
| 5539 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5540 | we.ExpungeUsers([], check_perms=False) |
| 5541 | |
| 5542 | @mock.patch( |
| 5543 | 'features.send_notifications.' |
| 5544 | 'PrepareAndSendDeletedFilterRulesNotification') |
| 5545 | def testExpungeUsers(self, fake_pasdfrn): |
| 5546 | """Test user data correctly expunged.""" |
| 5547 | # Replace template service mock with fake testing TemplateService |
| 5548 | self.services.template = fake.TemplateService() |
| 5549 | |
| 5550 | wipeout_emails = ['cow@test.com', 'chicken@test.com', 'llama@test.com', |
| 5551 | 'alpaca@test.com'] |
| 5552 | user_1 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('cow@test.com', 111) |
| 5553 | user_2 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('chicken@test.com', 222) |
| 5554 | user_3 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('llama@test.com', 333) |
| 5555 | user_4 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('random@test.com', 888) |
| 5556 | ids_by_email = {user_1.email: user_1.user_id, user_2.email: user_2.user_id, |
| 5557 | user_3.email: user_3.user_id} |
| 5558 | user_ids = list(ids_by_email.values()) |
| 5559 | |
| 5560 | # set up testing data |
| 5561 | starred_project_id = 19 |
| 5562 | self.services.project_star._SetStar(self.mr.cnxn, 12, user_1.user_id, True) |
| 5563 | self.services.user_star.SetStar( |
| 5564 | self.mr.cnxn, user_2.user_id, user_4.user_id, True) |
| 5565 | template = self.services.template.TestAddIssueTemplateDef( |
| 5566 | 13, 16, 'template name', owner_id=user_3.user_id) |
| 5567 | project1 = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 5568 | 'project1', owner_ids=[111, 333], project_id=16) |
| 5569 | project2 = self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 5570 | 'project2',owner_ids=[888], contrib_ids=[111, 222], |
| 5571 | committer_ids=[333], project_id=17) |
| 5572 | |
| 5573 | self.services.features.TestAddFilterRule( |
| 5574 | 16, 'owner:cow@test.com', add_cc_ids=[user_4.user_id]) |
| 5575 | self.services.features.TestAddFilterRule( |
| 5576 | 16, 'owner:random@test.com', |
| 5577 | add_cc_ids=[user_2.user_id, user_3.user_id]) |
| 5578 | self.services.features.TestAddFilterRule( |
| 5579 | 17, 'label:random-label', add_notify=[user_3.email]) |
| 5580 | kept_rule = self.services.features.TestAddFilterRule( |
| 5581 | 16, 'owner:random@test.com', add_notify=['random2@test.com']) |
| 5582 | |
| 5583 | self.mr.cnxn = mock.Mock() |
| 5584 | self.services.usergroup.group_dag = mock.Mock() |
| 5585 | |
| 5586 | # call ExpungeUsers |
| 5587 | self.mr.perms = permissions.ADMIN_PERMISSIONSET |
| 5588 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5589 | we.ExpungeUsers(wipeout_emails) |
| 5590 | |
| 5591 | # Assert users expunged in stars |
| 5592 | self.assertFalse(self.services.project_star.IsItemStarredBy( |
| 5593 | self.mr.cnxn, starred_project_id, user_1.user_id)) |
| 5594 | self.assertFalse(self.services.user_star.CountItemStars( |
| 5595 | self.mr.cnxn, user_2.user_id)) |
| 5596 | |
| 5597 | # Assert users expunged in quick edits and saved queries |
| 5598 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5599 | self.services.features.expunged_users_in_quick_edits, user_ids) |
| 5600 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5601 | self.services.features.expunged_users_in_saved_queries, user_ids) |
| 5602 | |
| 5603 | # Assert users expunged in templates and configs |
| 5604 | self.assertIsNone(template.owner_id) |
| 5605 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5606 | self.services.config.expunged_users_in_configs, user_ids) |
| 5607 | |
| 5608 | # Assert users expunged in projects |
| 5609 | self.assertEqual(project1.owner_ids, []) |
| 5610 | self.assertEqual(project2.contributor_ids, []) |
| 5611 | |
| 5612 | # Assert users expunged in issues |
| 5613 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5614 | self.services.issue.expunged_users_in_issues, user_ids) |
| 5615 | self.assertTrue(self.services.issue.enqueue_issues_called) |
| 5616 | |
| 5617 | # Assert users expunged in spam |
| 5618 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5619 | self.services.spam.expunged_users_in_spam, user_ids) |
| 5620 | |
| 5621 | # Assert users expunged in hotlists |
| 5622 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5623 | self.services.features.expunged_users_in_hotlists, user_ids) |
| 5624 | |
| 5625 | # Assert users expunged in groups |
| 5626 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5627 | self.services.usergroup.expunged_users_in_groups, user_ids) |
| 5628 | |
| 5629 | # Assert filter rules expunged |
| 5630 | self.assertEqual( |
| 5631 | self.services.features.test_rules[16], [kept_rule]) |
| 5632 | self.assertEqual( |
| 5633 | self.services.features.test_rules[17], []) |
| 5634 | |
| 5635 | # Assert mocks |
| 5636 | self.assertEqual(7, len(self.mr.cnxn.Commit.call_args_list)) |
| 5637 | self.services.usergroup.group_dag.MarkObsolete.assert_called_once() |
| 5638 | |
| 5639 | fake_pasdfrn.assert_has_calls( |
| 5640 | [mock.call( |
| 5641 | 16, |
| 5642 | 'testing-app.appspot.com', |
| 5643 | ['if owner:%s then add cc(s): random@test.com' % ( |
| 5644 | framework_constants.DELETED_USER_NAME), |
| 5645 | 'if owner:random@test.com then add cc(s): %s, %s' % ( |
| 5646 | framework_constants.DELETED_USER_NAME, |
| 5647 | framework_constants.DELETED_USER_NAME)]), |
| 5648 | mock.call( |
| 5649 | 17, |
| 5650 | 'testing-app.appspot.com', |
| 5651 | ['if label:random-label then notify: %s' % ( |
| 5652 | framework_constants.DELETED_USER_NAME)]) |
| 5653 | ]) |
| 5654 | |
| 5655 | def testTotalUsersCount_WithDeletedUser(self): |
| 5656 | # Clear users added previously with TestAddUser |
| 5657 | self.services.user.users_by_id = {} |
| 5658 | self.services.user.TestAddUser( |
| 5659 | '', framework_constants.DELETED_USER_ID) |
| 5660 | self.services.user.TestAddUser('cow@test.com', 111) |
| 5661 | self.services.user.TestAddUser('chicken@test.com', 222) |
| 5662 | self.assertEqual(2, self.services.user.TotalUsersCount(self.mr.cnxn)) |
| 5663 | |
| 5664 | def testTotalUsersCount(self): |
| 5665 | # Clear users added previously with TestAddUser |
| 5666 | self.services.user.users_by_id = {} |
| 5667 | self.services.user.TestAddUser('cow@test.com', 111) |
| 5668 | self.assertEqual(1, self.services.user.TotalUsersCount(self.mr.cnxn)) |
| 5669 | |
| 5670 | def testGetAllUserEmailsBatch(self): |
| 5671 | # Clear users added previously with TestAddUser |
| 5672 | self.services.user.users_by_id = {} |
| 5673 | user_1 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('cow@test.com', 111) |
| 5674 | user_2 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('chicken@test.com', 222) |
| 5675 | user_6 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('6@test.com', 666) |
| 5676 | user_5 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('5@test.com', 555) |
| 5677 | user_3 = self.services.user.TestAddUser('3@test.com', 333) |
| 5678 | self.services.user.TestAddUser('4@test.com', 444) |
| 5679 | |
| 5680 | |
| 5681 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5682 | [user_1.email, user_2.email, user_3.email], |
| 5683 | self.services.user.GetAllUserEmailsBatch(self.mr.cnxn, limit=3)) |
| 5684 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5685 | [user_5.email, user_6.email], |
| 5686 | self.services.user.GetAllUserEmailsBatch( |
| 5687 | self.mr.cnxn, limit=3, offset=4)) |
| 5688 | |
| 5689 | # Test existence of deleted user does not change results. |
| 5690 | self.services.user.TestAddUser( |
| 5691 | '', framework_constants.DELETED_USER_ID) |
| 5692 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5693 | [user_1.email, user_2.email, user_3.email], |
| 5694 | self.services.user.GetAllUserEmailsBatch(self.mr.cnxn, limit=3)) |
| 5695 | self.assertItemsEqual( |
| 5696 | [user_5.email, user_6.email], |
| 5697 | self.services.user.GetAllUserEmailsBatch( |
| 5698 | self.mr.cnxn, limit=3, offset=4)) |
| 5699 | |
| 5700 | # FUTURE: CreateGroup() |
| 5701 | # FUTURE: ListGroups() |
| 5702 | # FUTURE: UpdateGroup() |
| 5703 | # FUTURE: DeleteGroup() |
| 5704 | |
| 5705 | def AddIssueToHotlist(self, hotlist_id, issue_id=78901, adder_id=111): |
| 5706 | self.services.features.AddIssuesToHotlists( |
| 5707 | self.cnxn, [hotlist_id], [(issue_id, adder_id, 0, '')], |
| 5708 | None, None, None) |
| 5709 | |
| 5710 | def testCreateHotlist_Normal(self): |
| 5711 | """We can create a hotlist.""" |
| 5712 | issue_1 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 5713 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 5714 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_1) |
| 5715 | |
| 5716 | self.SignIn() |
| 5717 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5718 | hotlist = we.CreateHotlist( |
| 5719 | 'name', 'summary', 'description', [222], [78901], False, |
| 5720 | 'priority owner') |
| 5721 | |
| 5722 | self.assertEqual('name', hotlist.name) |
| 5723 | self.assertEqual('summary', hotlist.summary) |
| 5724 | self.assertEqual('description', hotlist.description) |
| 5725 | self.assertEqual([111], hotlist.owner_ids) |
| 5726 | self.assertEqual([222], hotlist.editor_ids) |
| 5727 | self.assertEqual([78901], [item.issue_id for item in hotlist.items]) |
| 5728 | self.assertEqual(False, hotlist.is_private) |
| 5729 | self.assertEqual('priority owner', hotlist.default_col_spec) |
| 5730 | |
| 5731 | def testCreateHotlist_NotViewable(self): |
| 5732 | """We cannot add issues we cannot see to a hotlist.""" |
| 5733 | hotlist_owner_id = 333 |
| 5734 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 5735 | 789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901, |
| 5736 | labels=['Restrict-View-Chicken']) |
| 5737 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 5738 | |
| 5739 | self.SignIn(user_id=hotlist_owner_id) |
| 5740 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 5741 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5742 | we.CreateHotlist( |
| 5743 | 'Cow-Hotlist', 'Moo', 'MooMoo', [], [issue1.issue_id], False, '') |
| 5744 | |
| 5745 | def testCreateHotlist_AnonCantCreateHotlist(self): |
| 5746 | """We must be signed in to create a hotlist.""" |
| 5747 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5748 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5749 | we.CreateHotlist('name', 'summary', 'description', [], [222], False, '') |
| 5750 | |
| 5751 | def testCreateHotlist_InvalidName(self): |
| 5752 | """We can't create a hotlist with an invalid name.""" |
| 5753 | self.SignIn() |
| 5754 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5755 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5756 | we.CreateHotlist( |
| 5757 | '***Invalid***', 'summary', 'description', [], [], False, '') |
| 5758 | |
| 5759 | def testCreateHotlist_HotlistAlreadyExists(self): |
| 5760 | """We can't create a hotlist with a name that already exists.""" |
| 5761 | self.SignIn() |
| 5762 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5763 | we.CreateHotlist('name', 'summary', 'description', [], [], False, '') |
| 5764 | |
| 5765 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.HotlistAlreadyExists): |
| 5766 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5767 | we.CreateHotlist('name', 'foo', 'bar', [], [], True, '') |
| 5768 | |
| 5769 | def testUpdateHotlist(self): |
| 5770 | """We can update a hotlist.""" |
| 5771 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5772 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5773 | we.UpdateHotlist( |
| 5774 | self.hotlist.hotlist_id, hotlist_name=self.hotlist.name, |
| 5775 | summary='new sum', description='new desc', |
| 5776 | owner_id=self.user_2.user_id, |
| 5777 | add_editor_ids=[self.user_1.user_id, self.user_3.user_id], |
| 5778 | is_private=False) |
| 5779 | updated_hotlist = we.GetHotlist(self.hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 5780 | |
| 5781 | expected_hotlist = features_pb2.Hotlist( |
| 5782 | hotlist_id=self.hotlist.hotlist_id, name=self.hotlist.name, |
| 5783 | summary='new sum', description='new desc', |
| 5784 | owner_ids=[self.user_2.user_id], |
| 5785 | editor_ids=[self.user_2.user_id, |
| 5786 | self.user_3.user_id, |
| 5787 | self.user_1.user_id], |
| 5788 | is_private=False) |
| 5789 | self.assertEqual(updated_hotlist, expected_hotlist) |
| 5790 | |
| 5791 | @mock.patch('testing.fake.FeaturesService.UpdateHotlist') |
| 5792 | def testUpdateHotlist_NoChanges(self, fake_update_hotlist): |
| 5793 | """The DB does not get updated if all changes are no-op changes""" |
| 5794 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5795 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5796 | we.UpdateHotlist( |
| 5797 | self.hotlist.hotlist_id, hotlist_name=self.hotlist.name, |
| 5798 | owner_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 5799 | add_editor_ids=[self.user_1.user_id, self.user_2.user_id], |
| 5800 | is_private=self.hotlist.is_private, |
| 5801 | default_col_spec=self.hotlist.default_col_spec, |
| 5802 | summary=self.hotlist.summary, |
| 5803 | description=self.hotlist.description) |
| 5804 | updated_hotlist = we.GetHotlist(self.hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 5805 | |
| 5806 | self.assertEqual(updated_hotlist, self.hotlist) |
| 5807 | fake_update_hotlist.assert_not_called() |
| 5808 | |
| 5809 | def testUpdateHotlist_HotlistNotFound(self): |
| 5810 | """Error is thrown when a hotlist is not found.""" |
| 5811 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5812 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.NoSuchHotlistException): |
| 5813 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5814 | we.UpdateHotlist(404) |
| 5815 | |
| 5816 | def testUpdateHotlist_NoPermissions(self): |
| 5817 | """Error is thrown when the user doesn't have administer permisisons.""" |
| 5818 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_2.user_id) |
| 5819 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 5820 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5821 | we.UpdateHotlist(self.hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 5822 | |
| 5823 | def testUpdateHotlist_InvalidName(self): |
| 5824 | """Error is thrown when proposed new name is invalid.""" |
| 5825 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5826 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5827 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5828 | we.UpdateHotlist(self.hotlist.hotlist_id, hotlist_name='-Chicken') |
| 5829 | |
| 5830 | def testUpdateHotlist_HotlistAlreadyExistsOwnerChange(self): |
| 5831 | """Error is thrown proposed owner has hotlist with same name.""" |
| 5832 | _hotlist_conflict = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 5833 | 'myhotlist', summary='old sum', owner_ids=[self.user_2.user_id], |
| 5834 | description='old desc', hotlist_id=458, is_private=True) |
| 5835 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5836 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.HotlistAlreadyExists): |
| 5837 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5838 | we.UpdateHotlist(self.hotlist.hotlist_id, owner_id=self.user_2.user_id) |
| 5839 | |
| 5840 | def testUpdateHotlist_HotlistAlreadyExistsNameChange(self): |
| 5841 | """Error is thrown when owner already has a hotlist with same name as |
| 5842 | proposed name.""" |
| 5843 | hotlist_conflict = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 5844 | 'myhotlist2', summary='old sum', owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id], |
| 5845 | description='old desc', hotlist_id=458, is_private=True) |
| 5846 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5847 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.HotlistAlreadyExists): |
| 5848 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5849 | we.UpdateHotlist( |
| 5850 | self.hotlist.hotlist_id, hotlist_name=hotlist_conflict.name) |
| 5851 | |
| 5852 | def testUpdateHotlist_HotlistAlreadyExistsNameAndOwnerChange(self): |
| 5853 | """Error is thrown when new owner already has hotlist with same new name.""" |
| 5854 | hotlist_conflict = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 5855 | 'myhotlist2', summary='old sum', owner_ids=[self.user_2.user_id], |
| 5856 | description='old desc', hotlist_id=458, is_private=True) |
| 5857 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5858 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.HotlistAlreadyExists): |
| 5859 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5860 | we.UpdateHotlist( |
| 5861 | self.hotlist.hotlist_id, owner_id=self.user_2.user_id, |
| 5862 | hotlist_name=hotlist_conflict.name) |
| 5863 | |
| 5864 | def testGetHotlist_Normal(self): |
| 5865 | """We can get an existing hotlist by hotlist_id.""" |
| 5866 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 5867 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 5868 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 5869 | |
| 5870 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5871 | actual = we.GetHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 5872 | |
| 5873 | self.assertEqual(hotlist, actual) |
| 5874 | |
| 5875 | def testGetHotlist_NoneHotlist(self): |
| 5876 | """We reject attempts to pass a None hotlist_id.""" |
| 5877 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5878 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5879 | _actual = we.GetHotlist(None) |
| 5880 | |
| 5881 | def testGetHotlist_NoSuchHotlist(self): |
| 5882 | """We reject attempts to get a non-existent hotlist.""" |
| 5883 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.NoSuchHotlistException): |
| 5884 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5885 | _actual = we.GetHotlist(999) |
| 5886 | |
| 5887 | def testListHotlistItems_MoreItems(self): |
| 5888 | """We can get hotlist's sorted HotlistItems and next start index.""" |
| 5889 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 5890 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 5891 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', self.user_1.user_id, issue_id=78901) |
| 5892 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 5893 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 5894 | 'proj', project_id=788, committer_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 5895 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 5896 | 788, 2, 'sum', 'New', self.user_1.user_id, issue_id=78802) |
| 5897 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 5898 | issue3 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 5899 | 789, 3, 'sum', 'New', self.user_3.user_id, issue_id=78803) |
| 5900 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue3) |
| 5901 | base_date = 1205079300 |
| 5902 | hotlist_item_tuples = [ |
| 5903 | (issue1.issue_id, 1, self.user_1.user_id, base_date + 2, 'dude wheres'), |
| 5904 | (issue2.issue_id, 31, self.user_1.user_id, base_date + 1, 'my car'), |
| 5905 | (issue3.issue_id, 21, self.user_1.user_id, base_date, '')] |
| 5906 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 5907 | 'hotlist', summary='Summary', description='Description', |
| 5908 | owner_ids=owner_ids, hotlist_id=123, |
| 5909 | hotlist_item_fields=hotlist_item_tuples) |
| 5910 | |
| 5911 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5912 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5913 | max_items = 2 |
| 5914 | start = 0 |
| 5915 | can = 1 |
| 5916 | sort_spec = 'rank' |
| 5917 | group_by_spec = '' |
| 5918 | list_result = we.ListHotlistItems( |
| 5919 | hotlist.hotlist_id, max_items, start, can, sort_spec, group_by_spec) |
| 5920 | |
| 5921 | expected_items = [ |
| 5922 | features_pb2.Hotlist.HotlistItem( |
| 5923 | issue_id=issue1.issue_id, rank=1, adder_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 5924 | date_added=base_date + 2, note='dude wheres'), |
| 5925 | features_pb2.Hotlist.HotlistItem( |
| 5926 | issue_id=issue3.issue_id, rank=21, adder_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 5927 | date_added=base_date, note='')] |
| 5928 | self.assertEqual(list_result.items, expected_items) |
| 5929 | |
| 5930 | self.assertEqual(list_result.next_start, 2) |
| 5931 | |
| 5932 | def testListHotlistItems_OutOfRange(self): |
| 5933 | """We can handle out of range `start` and `max_items`.""" |
| 5934 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 5935 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 5936 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', self.user_1.user_id, issue_id=78901) |
| 5937 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 5938 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 5939 | 'proj', project_id=788, committer_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 5940 | base_date = 1205079300 |
| 5941 | hotlist_item_tuples = [ |
| 5942 | (issue1.issue_id, 1, self.user_1.user_id, base_date + 2, 'dude wheres')] |
| 5943 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 5944 | 'hotlist', summary='Summary', description='Description', |
| 5945 | owner_ids=owner_ids, hotlist_id=123, |
| 5946 | hotlist_item_fields=hotlist_item_tuples) |
| 5947 | |
| 5948 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5949 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5950 | max_items = 10 |
| 5951 | start = 4 |
| 5952 | can = 1 |
| 5953 | sort_spec = '' |
| 5954 | group_by_spec = '' |
| 5955 | list_result = we.ListHotlistItems( |
| 5956 | hotlist.hotlist_id, max_items, start, can, sort_spec, group_by_spec) |
| 5957 | |
| 5958 | self.assertEqual(list_result.items, []) |
| 5959 | |
| 5960 | self.assertIsNone(list_result.next_start) |
| 5961 | |
| 5962 | def testListHotlistItems_InvalidMaxItems(self): |
| 5963 | """We raise an exception if the given max_items is invalid.""" |
| 5964 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 5965 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 5966 | 'hotlist', |
| 5967 | summary='Summary', |
| 5968 | description='Description', |
| 5969 | owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 5970 | hotlist_id=123) |
| 5971 | |
| 5972 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5973 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5974 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5975 | max_items = -2 |
| 5976 | start = 0 |
| 5977 | can = 1 |
| 5978 | sort_spec = 'rank' |
| 5979 | group_by_spec = '' |
| 5980 | we.ListHotlistItems( |
| 5981 | hotlist.hotlist_id, max_items, start, can, sort_spec, group_by_spec) |
| 5982 | |
| 5983 | def testListHotlistItems_InvalidStart(self): |
| 5984 | """We raise an exception if the given start is invalid.""" |
| 5985 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 5986 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 5987 | 'hotlist', |
| 5988 | summary='Summary', |
| 5989 | description='Description', |
| 5990 | owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 5991 | hotlist_id=123) |
| 5992 | |
| 5993 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 5994 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 5995 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 5996 | max_items = 10 |
| 5997 | start = -1 |
| 5998 | can = 1 |
| 5999 | sort_spec = 'rank' |
| 6000 | group_by_spec = '' |
| 6001 | we.ListHotlistItems( |
| 6002 | hotlist.hotlist_id, max_items, start, can, sort_spec, group_by_spec) |
| 6003 | |
| 6004 | |
| 6005 | def testListHotlistItems_OpenOnly(self): |
| 6006 | """We can get hotlist's sorted HotlistItems.""" |
| 6007 | base_date = 1205079300 |
| 6008 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6009 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 6010 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', self.user_1.user_id, issue_id=78901) |
| 6011 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 6012 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 6013 | 789, 2, 'sum', 'Fixed', self.user_1.user_id, issue_id=78902, |
| 6014 | closed_timestamp=base_date + 10) |
| 6015 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 6016 | hotlist_item_tuples = [ |
| 6017 | (issue1.issue_id, 1, self.user_1.user_id, base_date + 2, 'dude wheres'), |
| 6018 | (issue2.issue_id, 31, self.user_1.user_id, base_date + 1, 'my car')] |
| 6019 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6020 | 'hotlist', summary='Summary', description='Description', |
| 6021 | owner_ids=owner_ids, hotlist_id=123, |
| 6022 | hotlist_item_fields=hotlist_item_tuples) |
| 6023 | |
| 6024 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 6025 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6026 | max_items = 2 |
| 6027 | start = 0 |
| 6028 | can = 2 |
| 6029 | sort_spec = 'rank' |
| 6030 | group_by_spec = '' |
| 6031 | list_result = we.ListHotlistItems( |
| 6032 | hotlist.hotlist_id, max_items, start, can, sort_spec, group_by_spec) |
| 6033 | |
| 6034 | expected_items = [ |
| 6035 | features_pb2.Hotlist.HotlistItem( |
| 6036 | issue_id=issue1.issue_id, rank=1, adder_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 6037 | date_added=base_date + 2, note='dude wheres')] |
| 6038 | self.assertEqual(list_result.items, expected_items) |
| 6039 | |
| 6040 | self.assertIsNone(list_result.next_start) |
| 6041 | |
| 6042 | def testListHotlistItems_HideRestricted(self): |
| 6043 | """We can get hotlist's sorted HotlistItems.""" |
| 6044 | base_date = 1205079300 |
| 6045 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6046 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 6047 | 789, 1, 'sum', 'New', self.user_1.user_id, issue_id=78901) |
| 6048 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 6049 | self.services.project.TestAddProject( |
| 6050 | 'proj', project_id=788, committer_ids=[self.user_1.user_id]) |
| 6051 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 6052 | 788, 2, 'sum', 'New', self.user_1.user_id, issue_id=78802, |
| 6053 | closed_timestamp=base_date + 15) |
| 6054 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 6055 | issue3 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 6056 | 789, 3, 'sum', 'New', self.user_3.user_id, issue_id=78803, |
| 6057 | closed_timestamp=base_date + 10, |
| 6058 | labels=['Restrict-View-Sheep']) # user_1 does not have 'Sheep' perms |
| 6059 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue3) |
| 6060 | hotlist_item_tuples = [ |
| 6061 | (issue1.issue_id, 1, self.user_1.user_id, base_date + 2, 'dude wheres'), |
| 6062 | (issue3.issue_id, 21, self.user_2.user_id, base_date, ''), |
| 6063 | (issue2.issue_id, 31, self.user_1.user_id, base_date + 1, 'my car')] |
| 6064 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6065 | 'hotlist', summary='Summary', description='Description', |
| 6066 | owner_ids=owner_ids, hotlist_id=123, |
| 6067 | hotlist_item_fields=hotlist_item_tuples) |
| 6068 | |
| 6069 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 6070 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6071 | max_items = 3 |
| 6072 | start = 0 |
| 6073 | can = 1 |
| 6074 | sort_spec = 'rank' |
| 6075 | group_by_spec = '' |
| 6076 | list_result = we.ListHotlistItems( |
| 6077 | hotlist.hotlist_id, max_items, start, can, sort_spec, group_by_spec) |
| 6078 | |
| 6079 | expected_items = [ |
| 6080 | features_pb2.Hotlist.HotlistItem( |
| 6081 | issue_id=issue1.issue_id, rank=1, adder_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 6082 | date_added=base_date + 2, note='dude wheres'), |
| 6083 | features_pb2.Hotlist.HotlistItem( |
| 6084 | issue_id=issue2.issue_id, rank=31, adder_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 6085 | date_added=base_date + 1, note='my car')] |
| 6086 | self.assertEqual(list_result.items, expected_items) |
| 6087 | |
| 6088 | self.assertIsNone(list_result.next_start) |
| 6089 | |
| 6090 | def testTransferHotlistOwnership(self): |
| 6091 | """We can transfer ownership of a hotlist.""" |
| 6092 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6093 | editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6094 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6095 | 'hotlist', summary='Summary', description='Description', |
| 6096 | owner_ids=owner_ids, editor_ids=editor_ids, hotlist_id=123) |
| 6097 | |
| 6098 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 6099 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6100 | we.TransferHotlistOwnership( |
| 6101 | hotlist.hotlist_id, self.user_2.user_id, True) |
| 6102 | transferred_hotlist = we.GetHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6103 | self.assertEqual(transferred_hotlist.owner_ids, editor_ids) |
| 6104 | self.assertEqual(transferred_hotlist.editor_ids, owner_ids) |
| 6105 | |
| 6106 | def testTransferHotlistOwnership_NoPermission(self): |
| 6107 | """We only let hotlist owners transfer hotlist ownership.""" |
| 6108 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6109 | editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6110 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6111 | 'SameName', summary='Summary', description='Description', |
| 6112 | owner_ids=owner_ids, editor_ids=editor_ids, hotlist_id=123) |
| 6113 | |
| 6114 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6115 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6116 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6117 | we.TransferHotlistOwnership( |
| 6118 | hotlist.hotlist_id, self.user_2.user_id, True) |
| 6119 | |
| 6120 | def testTransferHotlistOwnership_RejectNewOwner(self): |
| 6121 | """We reject attempts when new owner already owns a |
| 6122 | hotlist with the same name.""" |
| 6123 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6124 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6125 | 'SameName', summary='Summary', description='Description', |
| 6126 | owner_ids=owner_ids, hotlist_id=123) |
| 6127 | _other_hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6128 | 'SameName', summary='summary', description='description', |
| 6129 | owner_ids=[self.user_2.user_id], hotlist_id=124) |
| 6130 | |
| 6131 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 6132 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6133 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6134 | we.TransferHotlistOwnership( |
| 6135 | hotlist.hotlist_id, self.user_2.user_id, True) |
| 6136 | |
| 6137 | def testRemoveHotlistEditors(self): |
| 6138 | """Hotlist owner can remove editors as normal.""" |
| 6139 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6140 | editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6141 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6142 | 'RejectUnowned', |
| 6143 | summary='Summary', |
| 6144 | description='description', |
| 6145 | owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 6146 | editor_ids=editor_ids, |
| 6147 | hotlist_id=1257) |
| 6148 | |
| 6149 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 6150 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6151 | remove_editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6152 | we.RemoveHotlistEditors(hotlist.hotlist_id, remove_editor_ids) |
| 6153 | |
| 6154 | updated_hotlist = we.GetHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6155 | self.assertEqual(updated_hotlist.owner_ids, owner_ids) |
| 6156 | self.assertEqual(updated_hotlist.editor_ids, []) |
| 6157 | |
| 6158 | def testRemoveHotlistEditors_NoPermission(self): |
| 6159 | """A user who is not in the hotlist cannot remove editors.""" |
| 6160 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6161 | editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6162 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6163 | 'RejectUnowned', |
| 6164 | summary='Summary', |
| 6165 | description='description', |
| 6166 | owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 6167 | editor_ids=editor_ids, |
| 6168 | hotlist_id=1257) |
| 6169 | |
| 6170 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_3.user_id) |
| 6171 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6172 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6173 | remove_editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6174 | we.RemoveHotlistEditors(hotlist.hotlist_id, remove_editor_ids) |
| 6175 | |
| 6176 | def testRemoveHotlistEditors_CannotRemoveOtherEditors(self): |
| 6177 | """A user who is not the hotlist owner cannot remove editors.""" |
| 6178 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6179 | editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id, self.user_3.user_id] |
| 6180 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6181 | 'RejectUnowned', |
| 6182 | summary='Summary', |
| 6183 | description='description', |
| 6184 | owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 6185 | editor_ids=editor_ids, |
| 6186 | hotlist_id=1257) |
| 6187 | |
| 6188 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_3.user_id) |
| 6189 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6190 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6191 | remove_editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6192 | we.RemoveHotlistEditors(hotlist.hotlist_id, remove_editor_ids) |
| 6193 | |
| 6194 | def testRemoveHotlistEditors_AllowRemoveSelf(self): |
| 6195 | """A non-owner member of a hotlist can remove themselves.""" |
| 6196 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6197 | editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6198 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6199 | 'RejectUnowned', |
| 6200 | summary='Summary', |
| 6201 | description='description', |
| 6202 | owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 6203 | editor_ids=editor_ids, |
| 6204 | hotlist_id=1257) |
| 6205 | |
| 6206 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6207 | |
| 6208 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6209 | remove_editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6210 | we.RemoveHotlistEditors(hotlist.hotlist_id, remove_editor_ids) |
| 6211 | |
| 6212 | updated_hotlist = we.GetHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6213 | self.assertEqual(updated_hotlist.owner_ids, owner_ids) |
| 6214 | self.assertEqual(updated_hotlist.editor_ids, []) |
| 6215 | |
| 6216 | # assert cannot remove someone else |
| 6217 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6218 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6219 | we.RemoveHotlistEditors(hotlist.hotlist_id, [self.user_3.user_id]) |
| 6220 | |
| 6221 | def testRemoveHotlistEditors_AllowRemoveParentLinkedAccount(self): |
| 6222 | """A non-owner member of a hotlist can remove their linked accounts.""" |
| 6223 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6224 | editor_ids = [self.user_3.user_id] |
| 6225 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6226 | 'RejectUnowned', |
| 6227 | summary='Summary', |
| 6228 | description='description', |
| 6229 | owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 6230 | editor_ids=editor_ids, |
| 6231 | hotlist_id=1257) |
| 6232 | self.services.user.InviteLinkedParent( |
| 6233 | self.cnxn, self.user_3.user_id, self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6234 | self.services.user.AcceptLinkedChild( |
| 6235 | self.cnxn, self.user_3.user_id, self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6236 | |
| 6237 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6238 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6239 | remove_editor_ids = [self.user_3.user_id] |
| 6240 | we.RemoveHotlistEditors(hotlist.hotlist_id, remove_editor_ids) |
| 6241 | |
| 6242 | updated_hotlist = we.GetHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6243 | self.assertEqual(updated_hotlist.owner_ids, owner_ids) |
| 6244 | self.assertEqual(updated_hotlist.editor_ids, []) |
| 6245 | |
| 6246 | def testRemoveHotlistEditors_AllowRemoveChildLinkedAccount(self): |
| 6247 | """A non-owner member of a hotlist can remove their linked accounts.""" |
| 6248 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6249 | editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6250 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6251 | 'RejectUnowned', |
| 6252 | summary='Summary', |
| 6253 | description='description', |
| 6254 | owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 6255 | editor_ids=editor_ids, |
| 6256 | hotlist_id=1257) |
| 6257 | self.services.user.InviteLinkedParent( |
| 6258 | self.cnxn, self.user_3.user_id, self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6259 | self.services.user.AcceptLinkedChild( |
| 6260 | self.cnxn, self.user_3.user_id, self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6261 | |
| 6262 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_3.user_id) |
| 6263 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6264 | remove_editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6265 | we.RemoveHotlistEditors(hotlist.hotlist_id, remove_editor_ids) |
| 6266 | |
| 6267 | updated_hotlist = we.GetHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6268 | self.assertEqual(updated_hotlist.owner_ids, owner_ids) |
| 6269 | self.assertEqual(updated_hotlist.editor_ids, []) |
| 6270 | |
| 6271 | def testDeleteHotlist(self): |
| 6272 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6273 | self.cnxn, 'hotlistName', 'summary', 'desc', [444], []) |
| 6274 | |
| 6275 | self.SignIn(user_id=444) |
| 6276 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6277 | we.DeleteHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6278 | |
| 6279 | # Just test that services.features.ExpungeHotlists was called |
| 6280 | self.assertTrue( |
| 6281 | hotlist.hotlist_id in self.services.features.expunged_hotlist_ids) |
| 6282 | |
| 6283 | def testDeleteHotlist_NoPerms(self): |
| 6284 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6285 | self.cnxn, 'hotlistName', 'summary', 'desc', [444], []) |
| 6286 | |
| 6287 | self.SignIn(user_id=333) |
| 6288 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6289 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6290 | we.DeleteHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6291 | |
| 6292 | def testListHotlistsByUser_Normal(self): |
| 6293 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6294 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6295 | owner_ids=[444], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6296 | |
| 6297 | self.SignIn() |
| 6298 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6299 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByUser(444) |
| 6300 | |
| 6301 | self.assertEqual(1, len(hotlists)) |
| 6302 | hotlist = hotlists[0] |
| 6303 | self.assertEqual([444], hotlist.owner_ids) |
| 6304 | self.assertEqual([], hotlist.editor_ids) |
| 6305 | self.assertEqual('Fake-Hotlist', hotlist.name) |
| 6306 | self.assertEqual('Summary', hotlist.summary) |
| 6307 | self.assertEqual('Description', hotlist.description) |
| 6308 | |
| 6309 | def testListHotlistsByUser_AnotherUser(self): |
| 6310 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6311 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6312 | owner_ids=[333], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6313 | |
| 6314 | self.SignIn() |
| 6315 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6316 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByUser(333) |
| 6317 | |
| 6318 | self.assertEqual(1, len(hotlists)) |
| 6319 | hotlist = hotlists[0] |
| 6320 | self.assertEqual([333], hotlist.owner_ids) |
| 6321 | self.assertEqual([], hotlist.editor_ids) |
| 6322 | self.assertEqual('Fake-Hotlist', hotlist.name) |
| 6323 | self.assertEqual('Summary', hotlist.summary) |
| 6324 | self.assertEqual('Description', hotlist.description) |
| 6325 | |
| 6326 | def testListHotlistsByUser_NotSignedIn(self): |
| 6327 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6328 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6329 | owner_ids=[444], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6330 | |
| 6331 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6332 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByUser(444) |
| 6333 | |
| 6334 | self.assertEqual(1, len(hotlists)) |
| 6335 | hotlist = hotlists[0] |
| 6336 | self.assertEqual([444], hotlist.owner_ids) |
| 6337 | self.assertEqual([], hotlist.editor_ids) |
| 6338 | self.assertEqual('Fake-Hotlist', hotlist.name) |
| 6339 | self.assertEqual('Summary', hotlist.summary) |
| 6340 | self.assertEqual('Description', hotlist.description) |
| 6341 | |
| 6342 | def testListHotlistsByUser_NoUserId(self): |
| 6343 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6344 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6345 | we.ListHotlistsByUser(None) |
| 6346 | |
| 6347 | |
| 6348 | def testListHotlistsByUser_Empty(self): |
| 6349 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6350 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6351 | owner_ids=[333], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6352 | |
| 6353 | self.SignIn() |
| 6354 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6355 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByUser(444) |
| 6356 | |
| 6357 | self.assertEqual(0, len(hotlists)) |
| 6358 | |
| 6359 | def testListHotlistsByUser_NoHotlists(self): |
| 6360 | self.SignIn() |
| 6361 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6362 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByUser(444) |
| 6363 | |
| 6364 | self.assertEqual(0, len(hotlists)) |
| 6365 | |
| 6366 | def testListHotlistsByUser_PrivateHotlistAsOwner(self): |
| 6367 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6368 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6369 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[333], is_private=True) |
| 6370 | |
| 6371 | self.SignIn() |
| 6372 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6373 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByUser(333) |
| 6374 | |
| 6375 | self.assertEqual(1, len(hotlists)) |
| 6376 | hotlist = hotlists[0] |
| 6377 | self.assertEqual([111], hotlist.owner_ids) |
| 6378 | self.assertEqual([333], hotlist.editor_ids) |
| 6379 | self.assertEqual('Fake-Hotlist', hotlist.name) |
| 6380 | self.assertEqual('Summary', hotlist.summary) |
| 6381 | self.assertEqual('Description', hotlist.description) |
| 6382 | |
| 6383 | def testListHotlistsByUser_PrivateHotlistAsEditor(self): |
| 6384 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6385 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6386 | owner_ids=[333], editor_ids=[111], is_private=True) |
| 6387 | |
| 6388 | self.SignIn() |
| 6389 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6390 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByUser(333) |
| 6391 | |
| 6392 | self.assertEqual(1, len(hotlists)) |
| 6393 | hotlist = hotlists[0] |
| 6394 | self.assertEqual([333], hotlist.owner_ids) |
| 6395 | self.assertEqual([111], hotlist.editor_ids) |
| 6396 | self.assertEqual('Fake-Hotlist', hotlist.name) |
| 6397 | self.assertEqual('Summary', hotlist.summary) |
| 6398 | self.assertEqual('Description', hotlist.description) |
| 6399 | |
| 6400 | def testListHotlistsByUser_PrivateHotlistNoAcess(self): |
| 6401 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6402 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6403 | owner_ids=[333], editor_ids=[], is_private=True) |
| 6404 | |
| 6405 | self.SignIn() |
| 6406 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6407 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByUser(333) |
| 6408 | |
| 6409 | self.assertEqual(0, len(hotlists)) |
| 6410 | |
| 6411 | def testListHotlistsByIssue_Normal(self): |
| 6412 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6413 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 6414 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6415 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6416 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6417 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6418 | |
| 6419 | self.SignIn() |
| 6420 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6421 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByIssue(78901) |
| 6422 | |
| 6423 | self.assertEqual(1, len(hotlists)) |
| 6424 | hotlist = hotlists[0] |
| 6425 | self.assertEqual([111], hotlist.owner_ids) |
| 6426 | self.assertEqual([], hotlist.editor_ids) |
| 6427 | self.assertEqual('Fake-Hotlist', hotlist.name) |
| 6428 | self.assertEqual('Summary', hotlist.summary) |
| 6429 | self.assertEqual('Description', hotlist.description) |
| 6430 | |
| 6431 | def testListHotlistsByIssue_NotSignedIn(self): |
| 6432 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6433 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 6434 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6435 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6436 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6437 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6438 | |
| 6439 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6440 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByIssue(78901) |
| 6441 | |
| 6442 | self.assertEqual(1, len(hotlists)) |
| 6443 | hotlist = hotlists[0] |
| 6444 | self.assertEqual([111], hotlist.owner_ids) |
| 6445 | self.assertEqual([], hotlist.editor_ids) |
| 6446 | self.assertEqual('Fake-Hotlist', hotlist.name) |
| 6447 | self.assertEqual('Summary', hotlist.summary) |
| 6448 | self.assertEqual('Description', hotlist.description) |
| 6449 | |
| 6450 | def testListHotlistsByIssue_NotAllowedToSeeIssue(self): |
| 6451 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6452 | issue.labels = ['Restrict-View-CoreTeam'] |
| 6453 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 6454 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6455 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6456 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6457 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6458 | |
| 6459 | # We should get a permission exception |
| 6460 | self.SignIn(333) |
| 6461 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6462 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6463 | we.ListHotlistsByIssue(78901) |
| 6464 | |
| 6465 | def testListHotlistsByIssue_NoSuchIssue(self): |
| 6466 | self.SignIn() |
| 6467 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchIssueException): |
| 6468 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6469 | we.ListHotlistsByIssue(78901) |
| 6470 | |
| 6471 | def testListHotlistsByIssue_NoHotlists(self): |
| 6472 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6473 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 6474 | |
| 6475 | self.SignIn() |
| 6476 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6477 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByIssue(78901) |
| 6478 | |
| 6479 | self.assertEqual(0, len(hotlists)) |
| 6480 | |
| 6481 | def testListHotlistsByIssue_PrivateHotlistAsOwner(self): |
| 6482 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6483 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 6484 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6485 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6486 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[333], is_private=True) |
| 6487 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6488 | |
| 6489 | self.SignIn() |
| 6490 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6491 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByIssue(78901) |
| 6492 | |
| 6493 | self.assertEqual(1, len(hotlists)) |
| 6494 | hotlist = hotlists[0] |
| 6495 | self.assertEqual([111], hotlist.owner_ids) |
| 6496 | self.assertEqual([333], hotlist.editor_ids) |
| 6497 | self.assertEqual('Fake-Hotlist', hotlist.name) |
| 6498 | self.assertEqual('Summary', hotlist.summary) |
| 6499 | self.assertEqual('Description', hotlist.description) |
| 6500 | |
| 6501 | def testListHotlistsByIssue_PrivateHotlistAsEditor(self): |
| 6502 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6503 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 6504 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6505 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6506 | owner_ids=[333], editor_ids=[111], is_private=True) |
| 6507 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6508 | |
| 6509 | self.SignIn() |
| 6510 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6511 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByIssue(78901) |
| 6512 | |
| 6513 | self.assertEqual(1, len(hotlists)) |
| 6514 | hotlist = hotlists[0] |
| 6515 | self.assertEqual([333], hotlist.owner_ids) |
| 6516 | self.assertEqual([111], hotlist.editor_ids) |
| 6517 | self.assertEqual('Fake-Hotlist', hotlist.name) |
| 6518 | self.assertEqual('Summary', hotlist.summary) |
| 6519 | self.assertEqual('Description', hotlist.description) |
| 6520 | |
| 6521 | def testListHotlistsByIssue_PrivateHotlistNoAcess(self): |
| 6522 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6523 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 6524 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6525 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6526 | owner_ids=[444], editor_ids=[333], is_private=True) |
| 6527 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6528 | |
| 6529 | self.SignIn() |
| 6530 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6531 | hotlists = we.ListHotlistsByIssue(78901) |
| 6532 | |
| 6533 | self.assertEqual(0, len(hotlists)) |
| 6534 | |
| 6535 | def testListRecentlyVisitedHotlists(self): |
| 6536 | hotlists = [ |
| 6537 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6538 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6539 | owner_ids=[444], editor_ids=[111]), |
| 6540 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6541 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist-2', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6542 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[333]), |
| 6543 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6544 | self.cnxn, 'Private-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6545 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[333], is_private=True), |
| 6546 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6547 | self.cnxn, 'Private-Hotlist-2', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6548 | owner_ids=[222], editor_ids=[333], is_private=True)] |
| 6549 | |
| 6550 | for hotlist in hotlists: |
| 6551 | self.work_env.services.user.AddVisitedHotlist( |
| 6552 | self.cnxn, 111, hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6553 | |
| 6554 | self.SignIn() |
| 6555 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6556 | visited_hotlists = we.ListRecentlyVisitedHotlists() |
| 6557 | |
| 6558 | # We don't have permission to see the last hotlist, because it is marked as |
| 6559 | # private and we're not owners or editors of it. |
| 6560 | self.assertEqual(hotlists[:-1], visited_hotlists) |
| 6561 | |
| 6562 | def testListRecentlyVisitedHotlists_Anon(self): |
| 6563 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6564 | self.assertEqual([], we.ListRecentlyVisitedHotlists()) |
| 6565 | |
| 6566 | def testListStarredHotlists(self): |
| 6567 | hotlists = [ |
| 6568 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6569 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6570 | owner_ids=[444], editor_ids=[111]), |
| 6571 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6572 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist-2', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6573 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[333]), |
| 6574 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6575 | self.cnxn, 'Private-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6576 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[333], is_private=True), |
| 6577 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6578 | self.cnxn, 'Private-Hotlist-2', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6579 | owner_ids=[222], editor_ids=[333], is_private=True)] |
| 6580 | |
| 6581 | for hotlist in hotlists: |
| 6582 | self.work_env.services.hotlist_star.SetStar( |
| 6583 | self.cnxn, hotlist.hotlist_id, 111, True) |
| 6584 | |
| 6585 | self.SignIn() |
| 6586 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6587 | visited_hotlists = we.ListStarredHotlists() |
| 6588 | |
| 6589 | # We don't have permission to see the last hotlist, because it is marked as |
| 6590 | # private and we're not owners or editors of it. |
| 6591 | self.assertEqual(hotlists[:-1], visited_hotlists) |
| 6592 | |
| 6593 | def testListStarredHotlists_Anon(self): |
| 6594 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6595 | self.assertEqual([], we.ListStarredHotlists()) |
| 6596 | |
| 6597 | def testStarHotlist_Normal(self): |
| 6598 | """We can star and unstar a hotlist.""" |
| 6599 | hotlist_id = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6600 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6601 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]).hotlist_id |
| 6602 | |
| 6603 | self.SignIn() |
| 6604 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6605 | self.assertFalse(we.IsHotlistStarred(hotlist_id)) |
| 6606 | we.StarHotlist(hotlist_id, True) |
| 6607 | self.assertTrue(we.IsHotlistStarred(hotlist_id)) |
| 6608 | we.StarHotlist(hotlist_id, False) |
| 6609 | self.assertFalse(we.IsHotlistStarred(hotlist_id)) |
| 6610 | |
| 6611 | def testStarHotlist_NoHotlistSpecified(self): |
| 6612 | """A hotlist must be specified.""" |
| 6613 | self.SignIn() |
| 6614 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6615 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6616 | we.StarHotlist(None, True) |
| 6617 | |
| 6618 | def testStarHotlist_NoSuchHotlist(self): |
| 6619 | """We can't star a nonexistent hotlist.""" |
| 6620 | self.SignIn() |
| 6621 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.NoSuchHotlistException): |
| 6622 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6623 | we.StarHotlist(999, True) |
| 6624 | |
| 6625 | def testStarHotlist_Anon(self): |
| 6626 | """Anon user can't star a hotlist.""" |
| 6627 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6628 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6629 | we.StarHotlist(999, True) |
| 6630 | |
| 6631 | # testIsHotlistStarred_Normal is Tested by method testStarHotlist_Normal(). |
| 6632 | |
| 6633 | def testIsHotlistStarred_Anon(self): |
| 6634 | """Anon user can't star a hotlist.""" |
| 6635 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6636 | self.assertFalse(we.IsHotlistStarred(999)) |
| 6637 | |
| 6638 | def testIsHotlistStarred_NoHotlistSpecified(self): |
| 6639 | """A Hotlist ID must be specified.""" |
| 6640 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6641 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6642 | we.IsHotlistStarred(None) |
| 6643 | |
| 6644 | def testIsHotlistStarred_NoSuchHotlist(self): |
| 6645 | """We can't check for stars on a nonexistent hotlist.""" |
| 6646 | self.SignIn() |
| 6647 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.NoSuchHotlistException): |
| 6648 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6649 | we.IsHotlistStarred(999) |
| 6650 | |
| 6651 | def testGetHotlistStarCount(self): |
| 6652 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6653 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6654 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6655 | self.services.hotlist_star.SetStar( |
| 6656 | self.cnxn, hotlist.hotlist_id, 111, True) |
| 6657 | self.services.hotlist_star.SetStar( |
| 6658 | self.cnxn, hotlist.hotlist_id, 222, True) |
| 6659 | |
| 6660 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6661 | self.assertEqual(2, we.GetHotlistStarCount(hotlist.hotlist_id)) |
| 6662 | |
| 6663 | def testGetHotlistStarCount_NoneHotlist(self): |
| 6664 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6665 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6666 | we.GetHotlistStarCount(None) |
| 6667 | |
| 6668 | def testGetHotlistStarCount_NoSuchHotlist(self): |
| 6669 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.NoSuchHotlistException): |
| 6670 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6671 | we.GetHotlistStarCount(123) |
| 6672 | |
| 6673 | def testCheckHotlistName_OK(self): |
| 6674 | self.SignIn() |
| 6675 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6676 | error = we.CheckHotlistName('Fake-Hotlist') |
| 6677 | self.assertIsNone(error) |
| 6678 | |
| 6679 | def testCheckHotlistName_Anon(self): |
| 6680 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6681 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6682 | we.CheckHotlistName('Fake-Hotlist') |
| 6683 | |
| 6684 | def testCheckHotlistName_InvalidName(self): |
| 6685 | self.SignIn() |
| 6686 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6687 | error = we.CheckHotlistName('**Invalid**') |
| 6688 | self.assertIsNotNone(error) |
| 6689 | |
| 6690 | def testCheckHotlistName_AlreadyExists(self): |
| 6691 | self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6692 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6693 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6694 | |
| 6695 | self.SignIn() |
| 6696 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6697 | error = we.CheckHotlistName('Fake-Hotlist') |
| 6698 | self.assertIsNotNone(error) |
| 6699 | |
| 6700 | def testRemoveIssuesFromHotlists(self): |
| 6701 | """We can remove issues from hotlists.""" |
| 6702 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6703 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 6704 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'sum2', 'New', 111, issue_id=78902) |
| 6705 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 6706 | |
| 6707 | hotlist1 = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6708 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6709 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6710 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist1.hotlist_id, issue1.issue_id) |
| 6711 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist1.hotlist_id, issue2.issue_id) |
| 6712 | |
| 6713 | hotlist2 = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6714 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist-2', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6715 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6716 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist2.hotlist_id, issue1.issue_id) |
| 6717 | |
| 6718 | self.SignIn() |
| 6719 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6720 | we.RemoveIssuesFromHotlists( |
| 6721 | [hotlist1.hotlist_id, hotlist2.hotlist_id], [issue1.issue_id]) |
| 6722 | |
| 6723 | self.assertEqual( |
| 6724 | [issue2.issue_id], [item.issue_id for item in hotlist1.items]) |
| 6725 | self.assertEqual(0, len(hotlist2.items)) |
| 6726 | |
| 6727 | def testRemoveIssuesFromHotlists_RemoveIssueNotInHotlist(self): |
| 6728 | """Removing an issue from a hotlist that doesn't have it has no effect.""" |
| 6729 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6730 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 6731 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'sum2', 'New', 111, issue_id=78902) |
| 6732 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 6733 | |
| 6734 | hotlist1 = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6735 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6736 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6737 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist1.hotlist_id, issue1.issue_id) |
| 6738 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist1.hotlist_id, issue2.issue_id) |
| 6739 | |
| 6740 | hotlist2 = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6741 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist-2', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6742 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6743 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist2.hotlist_id, issue1.issue_id) |
| 6744 | |
| 6745 | self.SignIn() |
| 6746 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6747 | # Issue 2 is not in Fake-Hotlist-2 |
| 6748 | we.RemoveIssuesFromHotlists([hotlist2.hotlist_id], [issue2.issue_id]) |
| 6749 | |
| 6750 | self.assertEqual( |
| 6751 | [issue1.issue_id, issue2.issue_id], |
| 6752 | [item.issue_id for item in hotlist1.items]) |
| 6753 | self.assertEqual( |
| 6754 | [issue1.issue_id], |
| 6755 | [item.issue_id for item in hotlist2.items]) |
| 6756 | |
| 6757 | def testRemoveIssuesFromHotlists_NotAllowed(self): |
| 6758 | """Only owners and editors can remove issues.""" |
| 6759 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6760 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6761 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6762 | |
| 6763 | # 333 is not an owner or editor. |
| 6764 | self.SignIn(333) |
| 6765 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6766 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6767 | we.RemoveIssuesFromHotlists([hotlist.hotlist_id], [1234]) |
| 6768 | |
| 6769 | def testRemoveIssuesFromHotlists_NoSuchHotlist(self): |
| 6770 | """We can't remove issues from non existent hotlists.""" |
| 6771 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.NoSuchHotlistException): |
| 6772 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6773 | we.RemoveIssuesFromHotlists([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]) |
| 6774 | |
| 6775 | def testAddIssuesToHotlists(self): |
| 6776 | """We can add issues to hotlists.""" |
| 6777 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6778 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 6779 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'sum2', 'New', 111, issue_id=78902) |
| 6780 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 6781 | |
| 6782 | hotlist1 = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6783 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6784 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6785 | hotlist2 = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6786 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist-2', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6787 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6788 | |
| 6789 | self.SignIn() |
| 6790 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6791 | we.AddIssuesToHotlists( |
| 6792 | [hotlist1.hotlist_id, hotlist2.hotlist_id], |
| 6793 | [issue1.issue_id, issue2.issue_id], |
| 6794 | 'Foo') |
| 6795 | |
| 6796 | self.assertEqual( |
| 6797 | [issue1.issue_id, issue2.issue_id], |
| 6798 | [item.issue_id for item in hotlist1.items]) |
| 6799 | self.assertEqual( |
| 6800 | [issue1.issue_id, issue2.issue_id], |
| 6801 | [item.issue_id for item in hotlist2.items]) |
| 6802 | |
| 6803 | self.assertEqual(['Foo', 'Foo'], [item.note for item in hotlist1.items]) |
| 6804 | self.assertEqual(['Foo', 'Foo'], [item.note for item in hotlist2.items]) |
| 6805 | |
| 6806 | def testAddIssuesToHotlists_IssuesAlreadyInHotlist(self): |
| 6807 | """Adding an issue to a hotlist that already has it has no effect.""" |
| 6808 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6809 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 6810 | issue2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'sum2', 'New', 111, issue_id=78902) |
| 6811 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue2) |
| 6812 | |
| 6813 | hotlist1 = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6814 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6815 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6816 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist1.hotlist_id, issue1.issue_id) |
| 6817 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist1.hotlist_id, issue2.issue_id) |
| 6818 | |
| 6819 | hotlist2 = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6820 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist-2', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6821 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6822 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist2.hotlist_id, issue1.issue_id) |
| 6823 | |
| 6824 | self.SignIn() |
| 6825 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6826 | # Issue 1 is in both hotlists |
| 6827 | we.AddIssuesToHotlists( |
| 6828 | [hotlist1.hotlist_id, hotlist2.hotlist_id], [issue1.issue_id], None) |
| 6829 | |
| 6830 | self.assertEqual( |
| 6831 | [issue1.issue_id, issue2.issue_id], |
| 6832 | [item.issue_id for item in hotlist1.items]) |
| 6833 | self.assertEqual( |
| 6834 | [issue1.issue_id], |
| 6835 | [item.issue_id for item in hotlist2.items]) |
| 6836 | |
| 6837 | def testAddIssuesToHotlists_NotViewable(self): |
| 6838 | """Users can add viewable issues to hotlists.""" |
| 6839 | issue1 = fake.MakeTestIssue( |
| 6840 | 789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6841 | issue1.labels = ['Restrict-View-CoreTeam'] |
| 6842 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue1) |
| 6843 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6844 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6845 | owner_ids=[333], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6846 | |
| 6847 | self.SignIn(user_id=333) |
| 6848 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6849 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6850 | we.AddIssuesToHotlists([hotlist.hotlist_id], [78901], None) |
| 6851 | |
| 6852 | def testAddIssuesToHotlists_NotAllowed(self): |
| 6853 | """Only owners and editors can add issues.""" |
| 6854 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 6855 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 6856 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 6857 | |
| 6858 | # 333 is not an owner or editor. |
| 6859 | self.SignIn(user_id=333) |
| 6860 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6861 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6862 | we.AddIssuesToHotlists([hotlist.hotlist_id], [1234], None) |
| 6863 | |
| 6864 | def testAddIssuesToHotlists_NoSuchHotlist(self): |
| 6865 | """We can't remove issues from non existent hotlists.""" |
| 6866 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.NoSuchHotlistException): |
| 6867 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6868 | we.AddIssuesToHotlists([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], None) |
| 6869 | |
| 6870 | def createHotlistWithItems(self): |
| 6871 | issue_1 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 6872 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_1) |
| 6873 | issue_2 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 2, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78902) |
| 6874 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_2) |
| 6875 | issue_3 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 3, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78903) |
| 6876 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_3) |
| 6877 | issue_4 = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 4, 'sum', 'New', 111, issue_id=78904) |
| 6878 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue_4) |
| 6879 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 6880 | editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 6881 | hotlist_items = [ |
| 6882 | (issue_4.issue_id, 31, self.user_3.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, ''), |
| 6883 | (issue_3.issue_id, 21, self.user_1.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, ''), |
| 6884 | (issue_2.issue_id, 11, self.user_2.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, ''), |
| 6885 | (issue_1.issue_id, 1, self.user_1.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, '') |
| 6886 | ] |
| 6887 | return self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 6888 | 'HotlistName', owner_ids=owner_ids, editor_ids=editor_ids, |
| 6889 | hotlist_item_fields=hotlist_items) |
| 6890 | |
| 6891 | def testRemoveHotlistItems(self): |
| 6892 | """We can remove issues from a hotlist.""" |
| 6893 | hotlist = self.createHotlistWithItems() |
| 6894 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6895 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6896 | we.RemoveHotlistItems(hotlist.hotlist_id, [78901, 78903]) |
| 6897 | |
| 6898 | self.assertEqual([item.issue_id for item in hotlist.items], [78902, 78904]) |
| 6899 | |
| 6900 | def testRemoveHotlistItems_NoHotlistPermissions(self): |
| 6901 | """We raise an exception if user lacks edit permissions in hotlist.""" |
| 6902 | self.SignIn(self.user_3.user_id) |
| 6903 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6904 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6905 | we.RemoveHotlistItems(self.hotlist.hotlist_id, [78901]) |
| 6906 | |
| 6907 | def testRemoveHotlistItems_NoSuchHotlist(self): |
| 6908 | """We raise an exception if the hotlist is not found.""" |
| 6909 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.NoSuchHotlistException): |
| 6910 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6911 | we.RemoveHotlistItems(self.dne_hotlist_id, [78901]) |
| 6912 | |
| 6913 | def testRemoveHotlistItems_ItemNotFound(self): |
| 6914 | """We raise an exception if user tries to remove item not in hotlist.""" |
| 6915 | hotlist = self.createHotlistWithItems() |
| 6916 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6917 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6918 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6919 | we.RemoveHotlistItems(hotlist.hotlist_id, [404]) |
| 6920 | |
| 6921 | def testAddHotlistItems_NoSuchHotlist(self): |
| 6922 | """We raise an exception if the hotlist is not found.""" |
| 6923 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.NoSuchHotlistException): |
| 6924 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6925 | we.AddHotlistItems(self.dne_hotlist_id, [78901], 0) |
| 6926 | |
| 6927 | def testAddHotlistItems_NoHotlistEditPermissions(self): |
| 6928 | """We raise an exception if the user lacks edit permissions in hotlist.""" |
| 6929 | self.SignIn(self.user_3.user_id) |
| 6930 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6931 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6932 | we.AddHotlistItems(self.hotlist.hotlist_id, [78901], 0) |
| 6933 | |
| 6934 | def testAddHotlistItems_NoItemsGiven(self): |
| 6935 | """We raise an exception if the given list of issues is empty.""" |
| 6936 | hotlist = self.createHotlistWithItems() |
| 6937 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6938 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6939 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6940 | we.AddHotlistItems(hotlist.hotlist_id, [], 0) |
| 6941 | |
| 6942 | def testAddHotlistItems(self): |
| 6943 | """We add new items to the hotlist and don't touch existing items.""" |
| 6944 | hotlist = self.createHotlistWithItems() |
| 6945 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6946 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6947 | we.AddHotlistItems(hotlist.hotlist_id, [78909, 78910, 78901], 2) |
| 6948 | |
| 6949 | expected_item_ids = [78901, 78902, 78909, 78910, 78903, 78904] |
| 6950 | updated_hotlist = we.GetHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 6951 | self.assertEqual( |
| 6952 | expected_item_ids, [item.issue_id for item in updated_hotlist.items]) |
| 6953 | |
| 6954 | def testRerankHotlistItems_NoPerms(self): |
| 6955 | """We don't let non editors/owners rerank HotlistItems.""" |
| 6956 | hotlist = self.createHotlistWithItems() |
| 6957 | moved_ids = [78901] |
| 6958 | target_position = 0 |
| 6959 | self.SignIn(self.user_3.user_id) |
| 6960 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 6961 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6962 | we.RerankHotlistItems(hotlist.hotlist_id, moved_ids, target_position) |
| 6963 | |
| 6964 | def testRerankHotlistItems_HotlistItemsNotFound(self): |
| 6965 | """We raise an exception if not all Issue IDs are in the hotlist.""" |
| 6966 | hotlist = self.createHotlistWithItems() |
| 6967 | # 78909 is not an existing HotlistItem issue. |
| 6968 | moved_ids = [78901, 78909] |
| 6969 | target_position = 1 |
| 6970 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6971 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6972 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6973 | we.RerankHotlistItems(hotlist.hotlist_id, moved_ids, target_position) |
| 6974 | |
| 6975 | def testRerankHotlistItems_MovedIssuesEmpty(self): |
| 6976 | """We raise an exception if the list of Issue IDs is empty.""" |
| 6977 | hotlist = self.createHotlistWithItems() |
| 6978 | moved_ids = [] |
| 6979 | target_position = 1 |
| 6980 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6981 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 6982 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6983 | we.RerankHotlistItems(hotlist.hotlist_id, moved_ids, target_position) |
| 6984 | |
| 6985 | @mock.patch('time.time') |
| 6986 | def testRerankHotlistItems(self, fake_time): |
| 6987 | """We can rerank HotlistItems.""" |
| 6988 | fake_time.return_value = self.PAST_TIME |
| 6989 | hotlist = self.createHotlistWithItems() |
| 6990 | moved_ids = [78901, 78903] |
| 6991 | target_position = 1 |
| 6992 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 6993 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 6994 | updated_hotlist = we.RerankHotlistItems( |
| 6995 | hotlist.hotlist_id, moved_ids, target_position) |
| 6996 | |
| 6997 | expected_item_ids = [78902, 78901, 78903, 78904] |
| 6998 | self.assertEqual( |
| 6999 | expected_item_ids, [item.issue_id for item in updated_hotlist.items]) |
| 7000 | |
| 7001 | @mock.patch('time.time') |
| 7002 | def testGetChangedHotlistItems(self, fake_time): |
| 7003 | """We can get changed HotlistItems when moving existing and new issues.""" |
| 7004 | fake_time.return_value = self.PAST_TIME |
| 7005 | hotlist = self.createHotlistWithItems() |
| 7006 | # moved_ids include new issues not in hotlist: [78907, 78909] |
| 7007 | moved_ids = [78901, 78907, 78903, 78909] |
| 7008 | target_position = 1 |
| 7009 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 7010 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7011 | changed_items = we._GetChangedHotlistItems( |
| 7012 | hotlist, moved_ids, target_position) |
| 7013 | |
| 7014 | expected_hotlist_items = [ |
| 7015 | features_pb2.Hotlist.HotlistItem( |
| 7016 | issue_id=78901, |
| 7017 | rank=14, |
| 7018 | note='', |
| 7019 | adder_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 7020 | date_added=self.PAST_TIME), |
| 7021 | features_pb2.Hotlist.HotlistItem( |
| 7022 | issue_id=78907, |
| 7023 | rank=19, |
| 7024 | adder_id=self.user_2.user_id, |
| 7025 | date_added=self.PAST_TIME), |
| 7026 | features_pb2.Hotlist.HotlistItem( |
| 7027 | issue_id=78903, |
| 7028 | rank=24, |
| 7029 | note='', |
| 7030 | adder_id=self.user_1.user_id, |
| 7031 | date_added=self.PAST_TIME), |
| 7032 | features_pb2.Hotlist.HotlistItem( |
| 7033 | issue_id=78909, |
| 7034 | rank=29, |
| 7035 | adder_id=self.user_2.user_id, |
| 7036 | date_added=self.PAST_TIME) |
| 7037 | ] |
| 7038 | self.assertEqual(changed_items, expected_hotlist_items) |
| 7039 | |
| 7040 | # TODO(crbug/monorail/7104): Remove these tests once RerankHotlistIssues |
| 7041 | # is deleted. |
| 7042 | def testRerankHotlistIssues_SplitAbove(self): |
| 7043 | """We can rerank issues in a hotlist with split_above = true.""" |
| 7044 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 7045 | editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 7046 | follower_ids = [] |
| 7047 | hotlist_items = [ |
| 7048 | (78904, 31, self.user_2.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, 'note'), |
| 7049 | (78903, 21, self.user_2.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, 'note'), |
| 7050 | (78902, 11, self.user_2.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, 'note'), |
| 7051 | (78901, 1, self.user_2.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, 'note')] |
| 7052 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 7053 | 'HotlistName', summary='summary', owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 7054 | editor_ids=editor_ids, follower_ids=follower_ids, |
| 7055 | hotlist_id=1235, hotlist_item_fields=hotlist_items) |
| 7056 | |
| 7057 | moved_ids = [78901] |
| 7058 | target_id = 78904 |
| 7059 | split_above = True |
| 7060 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 7061 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7062 | we.RerankHotlistIssues( |
| 7063 | hotlist.hotlist_id, moved_ids, target_id, split_above) |
| 7064 | updated_hotlist = we.GetHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 7065 | self.assertEqual( |
| 7066 | [item.issue_id for item in updated_hotlist.items], |
| 7067 | [78902, 78903, 78901, 78904]) |
| 7068 | |
| 7069 | def testRerankHotlistIssues_SplitBelow(self): |
| 7070 | """We can rerank issues in a hotlist with split_above = false.""" |
| 7071 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 7072 | editor_ids = [self.user_2.user_id] |
| 7073 | follower_ids = [] |
| 7074 | hotlist_items = [ |
| 7075 | (78904, 31, self.user_2.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, 'note'), |
| 7076 | (78903, 21, self.user_2.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, 'note'), |
| 7077 | (78902, 11, self.user_2.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, 'note'), |
| 7078 | (78901, 1, self.user_2.user_id, self.PAST_TIME, 'note')] |
| 7079 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 7080 | 'HotlistName', summary='summary', owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 7081 | editor_ids=editor_ids, follower_ids=follower_ids, |
| 7082 | hotlist_id=1235, hotlist_item_fields=hotlist_items) |
| 7083 | |
| 7084 | moved_ids = [78901] |
| 7085 | target_id = 78904 |
| 7086 | split_above = False |
| 7087 | self.SignIn(self.user_2.user_id) |
| 7088 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7089 | we.RerankHotlistIssues( |
| 7090 | hotlist.hotlist_id, moved_ids, target_id, split_above) |
| 7091 | updated_hotlist = we.GetHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 7092 | self.assertEqual( |
| 7093 | [item.issue_id for item in updated_hotlist.items], |
| 7094 | [78902, 78903, 78904, 78901]) |
| 7095 | |
| 7096 | def testRerankHotlistIssues_NoPerms(self): |
| 7097 | """We don't let non editors/owners update issue ranks.""" |
| 7098 | owner_ids = [self.user_1.user_id] |
| 7099 | editor_ids = [] |
| 7100 | follower_ids = [self.user_3.user_id] |
| 7101 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.TestAddHotlist( |
| 7102 | 'HotlistName', summary='summary', owner_ids=owner_ids, |
| 7103 | editor_ids=editor_ids, follower_ids=follower_ids, |
| 7104 | hotlist_id=1235) |
| 7105 | |
| 7106 | moved_ids = [78901] |
| 7107 | target_id = 78904 |
| 7108 | split_above = True |
| 7109 | self.SignIn(self.user_3.user_id) |
| 7110 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 7111 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7112 | we.RerankHotlistIssues( |
| 7113 | hotlist.hotlist_id, moved_ids, target_id, split_above) |
| 7114 | |
| 7115 | def testUpdateHotlistIssueNote(self): |
| 7116 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 7117 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 7118 | |
| 7119 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 7120 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 7121 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 7122 | self.AddIssueToHotlist(hotlist.hotlist_id, issue.issue_id) |
| 7123 | |
| 7124 | self.SignIn() |
| 7125 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7126 | we.UpdateHotlistIssueNote(hotlist.hotlist_id, 78901, 'Note') |
| 7127 | |
| 7128 | self.assertEqual('Note', hotlist.items[0].note) |
| 7129 | |
| 7130 | def testUpdateHotlistIssueNote_IssueNotInHotlist(self): |
| 7131 | issue = fake.MakeTestIssue(789, 1, 'sum1', 'New', 111, issue_id=78901) |
| 7132 | self.services.issue.TestAddIssue(issue) |
| 7133 | |
| 7134 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 7135 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 7136 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 7137 | |
| 7138 | self.SignIn() |
| 7139 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.InputException): |
| 7140 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7141 | we.UpdateHotlistIssueNote(hotlist.hotlist_id, 78901, 'Note') |
| 7142 | |
| 7143 | def testUpdateHotlistIssueNote_NoSuchIssue(self): |
| 7144 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 7145 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 7146 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 7147 | |
| 7148 | self.SignIn() |
| 7149 | with self.assertRaises(exceptions.NoSuchIssueException): |
| 7150 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7151 | we.UpdateHotlistIssueNote(hotlist.hotlist_id, 78901, 'Note') |
| 7152 | |
| 7153 | def testUpdateHotlistIssueNote_CantEditHotlist(self): |
| 7154 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 7155 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 7156 | owner_ids=[111], editor_ids=[]) |
| 7157 | |
| 7158 | self.SignIn(user_id=333) |
| 7159 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 7160 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7161 | we.UpdateHotlistIssueNote(hotlist.hotlist_id, 78901, 'Note') |
| 7162 | |
| 7163 | def testUpdateHotlistIssueNote_NoSuchHotlist(self): |
| 7164 | self.SignIn() |
| 7165 | with self.assertRaises(features_svc.NoSuchHotlistException): |
| 7166 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7167 | we.UpdateHotlistIssueNote(1234, 78901, 'Note') |
| 7168 | |
| 7169 | def testListHotlistPermissions_Anon(self): |
| 7170 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 7171 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 7172 | owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id], editor_ids=[]) |
| 7173 | # Anon can view public hotlist. |
| 7174 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7175 | anon_perms = we.ListHotlistPermissions(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 7176 | self.assertEqual(anon_perms, []) |
| 7177 | |
| 7178 | # Anon cannot view private hotlist. |
| 7179 | hotlist.is_private = True |
| 7180 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 7181 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7182 | we.ListHotlistPermissions(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 7183 | |
| 7184 | def testListHotlistPermissions_Owner(self): |
| 7185 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 7186 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 7187 | owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id], editor_ids=[]) |
| 7188 | |
| 7189 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 7190 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7191 | owner_perms = we.ListHotlistPermissions(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 7192 | self.assertEqual(owner_perms, permissions.HOTLIST_OWNER_PERMISSIONS) |
| 7193 | |
| 7194 | def testListHotlistPermissions_Editor(self): |
| 7195 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 7196 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 7197 | owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id], editor_ids=[self.user_2.user_id]) |
| 7198 | |
| 7199 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_2.user_id) |
| 7200 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7201 | owner_perms = we.ListHotlistPermissions(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 7202 | self.assertEqual(owner_perms, permissions.HOTLIST_EDITOR_PERMISSIONS) |
| 7203 | |
| 7204 | def testListHotlistPermissions_NonMember(self): |
| 7205 | hotlist = self.work_env.services.features.CreateHotlist( |
| 7206 | self.cnxn, 'Fake-Hotlist', 'Summary', 'Description', |
| 7207 | owner_ids=[self.user_1.user_id], editor_ids=[self.user_2.user_id]) |
| 7208 | |
| 7209 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_3.user_id) |
| 7210 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7211 | perms = we.ListHotlistPermissions(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 7212 | self.assertEqual(perms, []) |
| 7213 | |
| 7214 | hotlist.is_private = True |
| 7215 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 7216 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7217 | we.ListHotlistPermissions(hotlist.hotlist_id) |
| 7218 | |
| 7219 | def testListFieldDefPermissions_Anon(self): |
| 7220 | field_id = self.services.config.CreateFieldDef( |
| 7221 | self.cnxn, self.project.project_id, 'Field', 'STR_TYPE', None, None, |
| 7222 | None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, |
| 7223 | [], []) |
| 7224 | restricted_field_id = self.services.config.CreateFieldDef( |
| 7225 | self.cnxn, |
| 7226 | self.project.project_id, |
| 7227 | 'ResField', |
| 7228 | 'STR_TYPE', |
| 7229 | None, |
| 7230 | None, |
| 7231 | None, |
| 7232 | None, |
| 7233 | None, |
| 7234 | None, |
| 7235 | None, |
| 7236 | None, |
| 7237 | None, |
| 7238 | None, |
| 7239 | None, |
| 7240 | None, |
| 7241 | None, |
| 7242 | None, [], [], |
| 7243 | is_restricted_field=True) |
| 7244 | |
| 7245 | # Anon can only view fields in a public project. |
| 7246 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7247 | anon_perms = we.ListFieldDefPermissions(field_id, self.project.project_id) |
| 7248 | self.assertEqual(anon_perms, []) |
| 7249 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7250 | anon_perms = we.ListFieldDefPermissions( |
| 7251 | restricted_field_id, self.project.project_id) |
| 7252 | self.assertEqual(anon_perms, []) |
| 7253 | |
| 7254 | # Anon cannot view fields in a private project. |
| 7255 | self.project.access = project_pb2.ProjectAccess.MEMBERS_ONLY |
| 7256 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 7257 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7258 | anon_perms = we.ListFieldDefPermissions( |
| 7259 | field_id, self.project.project_id) |
| 7260 | with self.assertRaises(permissions.PermissionException): |
| 7261 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7262 | anon_perms = we.ListFieldDefPermissions( |
| 7263 | restricted_field_id, self.project.project_id) |
| 7264 | |
| 7265 | def testListFieldDefPermissions_SiteAdminAndProjectOwners(self): |
| 7266 | """SiteAdmins/ProjectOwners can always edit a field and its value.""" |
| 7267 | field_id = self.services.config.CreateFieldDef( |
| 7268 | self.cnxn, self.project.project_id, 'Field', 'STR_TYPE', None, None, |
| 7269 | None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, |
| 7270 | [], []) |
| 7271 | restricted_field_id = self.services.config.CreateFieldDef( |
| 7272 | self.cnxn, |
| 7273 | self.project.project_id, |
| 7274 | 'ResField', |
| 7275 | 'STR_TYPE', |
| 7276 | None, |
| 7277 | None, |
| 7278 | None, |
| 7279 | None, |
| 7280 | None, |
| 7281 | None, |
| 7282 | None, |
| 7283 | None, |
| 7284 | None, |
| 7285 | None, |
| 7286 | None, |
| 7287 | None, |
| 7288 | None, |
| 7289 | None, [], [], |
| 7290 | is_restricted_field=True) |
| 7291 | |
| 7292 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.admin_user.user_id) |
| 7293 | |
| 7294 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7295 | site_admin_perms_1 = we.ListFieldDefPermissions( |
| 7296 | field_id, self.project.project_id) |
| 7297 | self.assertEqual( |
| 7298 | site_admin_perms_1, |
| 7299 | [permissions.EDIT_FIELD_DEF, permissions.EDIT_FIELD_DEF_VALUE]) |
| 7300 | |
| 7301 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7302 | site_admin_perms_2 = we.ListFieldDefPermissions( |
| 7303 | restricted_field_id, self.project.project_id) |
| 7304 | self.assertEqual( |
| 7305 | site_admin_perms_2, |
| 7306 | [permissions.EDIT_FIELD_DEF, permissions.EDIT_FIELD_DEF_VALUE]) |
| 7307 | |
| 7308 | def testListFieldDefPermissions_FieldEditor(self): |
| 7309 | """Field Editors can edit the value of a field.""" |
| 7310 | field_id = self.services.config.CreateFieldDef( |
| 7311 | self.cnxn, self.project.project_id, 'Field', 'STR_TYPE', None, None, |
| 7312 | None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, |
| 7313 | [], [111]) |
| 7314 | restricted_field_id = self.services.config.CreateFieldDef( |
| 7315 | self.cnxn, |
| 7316 | self.project.project_id, |
| 7317 | 'ResField', |
| 7318 | 'STR_TYPE', |
| 7319 | None, |
| 7320 | None, |
| 7321 | None, |
| 7322 | None, |
| 7323 | None, |
| 7324 | None, |
| 7325 | None, |
| 7326 | None, |
| 7327 | None, |
| 7328 | None, |
| 7329 | None, |
| 7330 | None, |
| 7331 | None, |
| 7332 | None, [], [111], |
| 7333 | is_restricted_field=True) |
| 7334 | |
| 7335 | self.SignIn(user_id=self.user_1.user_id) |
| 7336 | |
| 7337 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7338 | field_editor_perms = we.ListFieldDefPermissions( |
| 7339 | field_id, self.project.project_id) |
| 7340 | self.assertEqual(field_editor_perms, [permissions.EDIT_FIELD_DEF_VALUE]) |
| 7341 | |
| 7342 | with self.work_env as we: |
| 7343 | field_editor_perms = we.ListFieldDefPermissions( |
| 7344 | restricted_field_id, self.project.project_id) |
| 7345 | self.assertEqual(field_editor_perms, [permissions.EDIT_FIELD_DEF_VALUE]) |
| 7346 | |
| 7347 | |
| 7348 | # FUTURE: UpdateHotlist() |
| 7349 | # FUTURE: DeleteHotlist() |
| 7350 | |
| 7351 | def setUpExpungeUsersFromStars(self): |
| 7352 | config = fake.MakeTestConfig(789, [], []) |
| 7353 | self.work_env.services.project_star.SetStarsBatch( |
| 7354 | self.cnxn, 789, [222, 444, 555], True) |
| 7355 | self.work_env.services.issue_star.SetStarsBatch( |
| 7356 | self.cnxn, self.services, config, 78901, [222, 444, 666], True) |
| 7357 | self.work_env.services.hotlist_star.SetStarsBatch( |
| 7358 | self.cnxn, 1678, [222, 444, 555], True) |
| 7359 | self.work_env.services.user_star.SetStarsBatch( |
| 7360 | self.cnxn, 888, [222, 333, 777], True) |
| 7361 | self.work_env.services.user_star.SetStarsBatch( |
| 7362 | self.cnxn, 999, [111, 222, 333], True) |
| 7363 | |
| 7364 | def testExpungeUsersFromStars(self): |
| 7365 | self.setUpExpungeUsersFromStars() |
| 7366 | user_ids = [999, 222, 555] |
| 7367 | self.work_env.expungeUsersFromStars(user_ids) |
| 7368 | self.assertEqual( |
| 7369 | self.work_env.services.project_star.LookupItemStarrers(self.cnxn, 789), |
| 7370 | [444]) |
| 7371 | self.assertEqual( |
| 7372 | self.work_env.services.issue_star.LookupItemStarrers(self.cnxn, 78901), |
| 7373 | [444, 666]) |
| 7374 | self.assertEqual( |
| 7375 | self.work_env.services.hotlist_star.LookupItemStarrers(self.cnxn, 1678), |
| 7376 | [444]) |
| 7377 | self.assertEqual( |
| 7378 | self.work_env.services.user_star.LookupItemStarrers(self.cnxn, 888), |
| 7379 | [333, 777]) |
| 7380 | self.assertEqual( |
| 7381 | self.work_env.services.user_star.expunged_item_ids, [999, 222, 555]) |